Letter: Social work and clinical synergy—Optimizing health interventions for elderly DGBI populations: Authors' reply

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1111/apt.18252
Ami D. Sperber, Tamar Freud, Olafur S. Palsson, Shrikant I. Bangdiwala, Magnus Simren
{"title":"Letter: Social work and clinical synergy—Optimizing health interventions for elderly DGBI populations: Authors' reply","authors":"Ami D. Sperber,&nbsp;Tamar Freud,&nbsp;Olafur S. Palsson,&nbsp;Shrikant I. Bangdiwala,&nbsp;Magnus Simren","doi":"10.1111/apt.18252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Drs. Chang, Wei and Liu for their interest in our paper on the ageing gastrointestinal tract,<span><sup>1</sup></span> as expressed in their letter.<span><sup>2</sup></span> We would like to make a few clarifications in response.</p><p>The most important point to clarify is that missing data were not an issue of concern in our analyses, and did not affect the findings. Therefore, the use of multiple imputations and sensitivity analysis suggested by the authors is not relevant to our study. The gastrointestinal symptom data from the 54,127 individuals, whose survey responses we analysed, did not have any missing data points. This reflects one of the strengths of the Internet-based electronic survey methodology we used, where responses can be automatically checked and answers enforced page by page by the survey software in order to prevent missing data.</p><p>Chang et al. also commented that it would have been important to include variables in our study on lifestyle factors, socioeconomic factors and chronic comorbidities, as well as doing sub-group analyses by country or centre, in order to reveal disparities in care and to guide tailoring of intervention strategies. We agree that examining healthcare disparities and elucidating ways to improve healthcare related to disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) are important research aims. However, these were not the goals of our study, which explicitly focused on examining whether older individuals in society generally have lower DGBI prevalence rates. However, future investigations of age differences in DGBI would do well to include assessment of lifestyle and socioeconomic factors, as these might be relevant to understanding the causes of reduced DGBI rates with advancing age. In particular, differences between younger and older adults in living conditions, lifestyle and daily stress, as well as generational differences in emotional factors, could play a role. We hope that our paper will spur further studies that can reveal the factors that explain the mysterious universal ageing-related decline in DGBI rates in populations across the world that we described.</p><p><b>Ami D. Sperber:</b> Writing – original draft; conceptualization. <b>Tamar Freud:</b> Writing – review and editing. <b>Olafur S. Palsson:</b> Writing – original draft; conceptualization. <b>Shrikant I. Bangdiwala:</b> Writing – review and editing. <b>Magnus Simren:</b> Writing – review and editing.</p><p>This article is linked to Sperber et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18103 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18225</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18252","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18252","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Drs. Chang, Wei and Liu for their interest in our paper on the ageing gastrointestinal tract,1 as expressed in their letter.2 We would like to make a few clarifications in response.

The most important point to clarify is that missing data were not an issue of concern in our analyses, and did not affect the findings. Therefore, the use of multiple imputations and sensitivity analysis suggested by the authors is not relevant to our study. The gastrointestinal symptom data from the 54,127 individuals, whose survey responses we analysed, did not have any missing data points. This reflects one of the strengths of the Internet-based electronic survey methodology we used, where responses can be automatically checked and answers enforced page by page by the survey software in order to prevent missing data.

Chang et al. also commented that it would have been important to include variables in our study on lifestyle factors, socioeconomic factors and chronic comorbidities, as well as doing sub-group analyses by country or centre, in order to reveal disparities in care and to guide tailoring of intervention strategies. We agree that examining healthcare disparities and elucidating ways to improve healthcare related to disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) are important research aims. However, these were not the goals of our study, which explicitly focused on examining whether older individuals in society generally have lower DGBI prevalence rates. However, future investigations of age differences in DGBI would do well to include assessment of lifestyle and socioeconomic factors, as these might be relevant to understanding the causes of reduced DGBI rates with advancing age. In particular, differences between younger and older adults in living conditions, lifestyle and daily stress, as well as generational differences in emotional factors, could play a role. We hope that our paper will spur further studies that can reveal the factors that explain the mysterious universal ageing-related decline in DGBI rates in populations across the world that we described.

Ami D. Sperber: Writing – original draft; conceptualization. Tamar Freud: Writing – review and editing. Olafur S. Palsson: Writing – original draft; conceptualization. Shrikant I. Bangdiwala: Writing – review and editing. Magnus Simren: Writing – review and editing.

This article is linked to Sperber et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18103 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18225

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信:社会工作与临床协同作用--优化针对 DGBI 老年人群的健康干预措施:作者回复。
我们感谢张博士、魏博士和刘博士在信中对我们关于胃肠道老化的论文1 所表达的兴趣2 。因此,作者提出的多重归因和敏感性分析与我们的研究无关。我们分析了 54127 人的调查回答,其中的胃肠道症状数据没有任何数据点缺失。Chang等人还评论说,在我们的研究中加入生活方式因素、社会经济因素和慢性并发症等变量,并按国家或中心进行分组分析,对于揭示医疗差异和指导干预策略的制定非常重要。我们同意,研究与肠脑互动障碍(DGBI)相关的医疗保健差异和阐明改善医疗保健的方法是重要的研究目标。然而,这些并不是我们的研究目标,我们的研究明确侧重于研究社会中老年人的 DGBI 患病率是否普遍较低。不过,未来对 DGBI 年龄差异的调查最好能包括对生活方式和社会经济因素的评估,因为这些因素可能与了解随着年龄增长 DGBI 患病率降低的原因有关。特别是,年轻人和老年人在生活条件、生活方式和日常压力方面的差异,以及在情感因素方面的代际差异,都可能起到一定的作用。我们希望我们的论文能促进进一步的研究,揭示我们所描述的全球人口中与年龄增长相关的DGBI率下降的神秘因素。塔玛尔-弗洛伊德写作--审阅和编辑。Olafur S. Palsson:写作--初稿;构思。Shrikant I. Bangdiwala:写作--审阅和编辑。马格努斯-西姆伦本文链接到 Sperber 等人的论文。要查看这些文章,请访问 https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18103 和 https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18225。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: The Impact of Socioeconomic and Ethnic Factors on Chronic Liver Disease Letter: Enhancing Predictive Models for Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis—Addressing Socioeconomic, Environmental and Clinical Factors. Authors' Reply Letter: Enhancing Predictive Models for Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis—Addressing Socioeconomic, Environmental and Clinical Factors Faecal Volatile Organic Compounds to Detect Colorectal Neoplasia in Lynch Syndrome—A Prospective Longitudinal Multicentre Study Editorial: Enhancing targeted screening of people living with HIV for liver fibrosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1