Mosquitocidal efficacy and pharmacokinetics of single-dose ivermectin versus three-day dose regimen for malaria vector control compared with albendazole and no treatment: An open-label randomized controlled trial

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107236
Yvonne Kamau , Mercy Tuwei , Caroline Wanjiku , Kelly Ominde , Mwanajuma Ngama , Jonathan Karisa , Lawrence Babu , Martha Muturi , Mwaganyuma Mwatasa , Jane Adetifa , Charlotte Kern , Urs Duthaler , Felix Hammann , Regina Rabinovich , Carlos Chaccour , Marta Ferreira Maia
{"title":"Mosquitocidal efficacy and pharmacokinetics of single-dose ivermectin versus three-day dose regimen for malaria vector control compared with albendazole and no treatment: An open-label randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yvonne Kamau ,&nbsp;Mercy Tuwei ,&nbsp;Caroline Wanjiku ,&nbsp;Kelly Ominde ,&nbsp;Mwanajuma Ngama ,&nbsp;Jonathan Karisa ,&nbsp;Lawrence Babu ,&nbsp;Martha Muturi ,&nbsp;Mwaganyuma Mwatasa ,&nbsp;Jane Adetifa ,&nbsp;Charlotte Kern ,&nbsp;Urs Duthaler ,&nbsp;Felix Hammann ,&nbsp;Regina Rabinovich ,&nbsp;Carlos Chaccour ,&nbsp;Marta Ferreira Maia","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>When malaria vectors consume ivermectin in a blood meal, their survival probability decreases, potentially reducing malaria transmission during mass drug administrations. However, questions remain regarding the optimal dosing. This study aimed to compare the mosquitocidal effect and pharmacokinetics of two-dose regimens of ivermectin for malaria vector control.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted an open-label randomized control trial in Kenya, staggered in blocks with sequential intervention groups and parallel controls. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1:1:1) using computer random-sequence generation, unstratified, with one block of six pharmacokinetics-only participants (single-dose ivermectin) and six blocks of four participants (3:1 intervention vs control), to receive single-dose ivermectin (400 mcg/kg, n = 12), three daily doses (3-day regimen 300 mcg/kg, n = 6), albendazole (400 mg, n = 6), or no treatment (negative control, n = 6). Our primary outcome was <em>Anopheles gambiae</em> survival (time-to-event [days]) after blood feeding up to 10 days after drug administration. We also evaluated pharmacokinetics (peak plasma and capillary blood concentration, areas under the plasma and capillary blood concentration-time curve from time of last administration to time of last observation, time to reach peak plasma and capillary blood concentration, terminal elimination half-life) up to 7 days after treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 36 healthy volunteers aged 21-32 years were recruited into the study and followed up to completion, with two participants not attending the visit on day 28. All drug regimens were well-tolerated. Both regimens showed significant mosquitocidal effect in the first 7 days. At 10 days after treatment, the single dose presented superior longevity of effect (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.91; 95% confidence interval = 1.93-7.93; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001) compared with the triple dose (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.79; 95% confidence interval = 0.88-3.62; <em>P</em> = 0.0.11). Albendazole had, overall, no mosquitocidal effect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>It is unclear why a single dose led to increased bio-efficacy compared with a triple dose. We recommend trials investigating ivermectin mass drug administrations for malaria control to consider single-dose ivermectin. A single-dose regimen is also expected to present additional operational advantages compared with a 3-day regimen, leading to improved programmatic suitability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224003072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

When malaria vectors consume ivermectin in a blood meal, their survival probability decreases, potentially reducing malaria transmission during mass drug administrations. However, questions remain regarding the optimal dosing. This study aimed to compare the mosquitocidal effect and pharmacokinetics of two-dose regimens of ivermectin for malaria vector control.

Design

We conducted an open-label randomized control trial in Kenya, staggered in blocks with sequential intervention groups and parallel controls. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1:1:1) using computer random-sequence generation, unstratified, with one block of six pharmacokinetics-only participants (single-dose ivermectin) and six blocks of four participants (3:1 intervention vs control), to receive single-dose ivermectin (400 mcg/kg, n = 12), three daily doses (3-day regimen 300 mcg/kg, n = 6), albendazole (400 mg, n = 6), or no treatment (negative control, n = 6). Our primary outcome was Anopheles gambiae survival (time-to-event [days]) after blood feeding up to 10 days after drug administration. We also evaluated pharmacokinetics (peak plasma and capillary blood concentration, areas under the plasma and capillary blood concentration-time curve from time of last administration to time of last observation, time to reach peak plasma and capillary blood concentration, terminal elimination half-life) up to 7 days after treatment.

Results

A total of 36 healthy volunteers aged 21-32 years were recruited into the study and followed up to completion, with two participants not attending the visit on day 28. All drug regimens were well-tolerated. Both regimens showed significant mosquitocidal effect in the first 7 days. At 10 days after treatment, the single dose presented superior longevity of effect (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.91; 95% confidence interval = 1.93-7.93; P <0.001) compared with the triple dose (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.79; 95% confidence interval = 0.88-3.62; P = 0.0.11). Albendazole had, overall, no mosquitocidal effect.

Conclusions

It is unclear why a single dose led to increased bio-efficacy compared with a triple dose. We recommend trials investigating ivermectin mass drug administrations for malaria control to consider single-dose ivermectin. A single-dose regimen is also expected to present additional operational advantages compared with a 3-day regimen, leading to improved programmatic suitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与阿苯达唑和不治疗相比,单剂量伊维菌素与三日剂量方案对疟疾病媒控制的杀蚊效果和药代动力学:一项开放标签随机对照试验。
目的:当疟疾病媒在血餐中摄入伊维菌素时,其存活概率会降低,从而有可能在大规模用药期间减少疟疾传播。然而,关于最佳剂量的问题依然存在。本研究旨在比较伊维菌素用于疟疾病媒控制的两种剂量方案的杀蚊效果和药代动力学:设计:我们在肯尼亚进行了一项开放标签随机对照试验,该试验分块进行,干预组和对照组依次交错。试验采用计算机随机序列生成技术对参与者进行随机分配(2:1:1:1),不分层,其中一个区组只有六名药物动力学参与者(单剂量伊维菌素),六个区组各有四名参与者(干预组与对照组的比例为 3:1),分别接受单剂量伊维菌素(400 毫克/千克,n=12)、每日三剂量(三日疗法 300 毫克/千克,n=6)、阿苯达唑(400 毫克,n=6)或不治疗(阴性对照,n=6)。我们的主要研究结果是给药后 10 天内冈比亚按蚊采血后的存活率(事件发生时间(天数))。我们还评估了治疗后 7 天内的药代动力学(Cmax、AUC、Tmax、Thalf):研究共招募了 36 名 21-32 岁的健康志愿者,并对他们进行了随访,其中有 2 人在第 28 天未参加随访。所有药物治疗方案的耐受性均良好。两种方案在头 7 天均显示出明显的杀蚊效果。在治疗后 10 天,单一剂量的疗效更持久(aHR(调整后危险比)=3.91;95% CI=1.93-7.93;p 结论:目前还不清楚为什么单剂量比三剂量的生物有效性更高。我们建议研究伊维菌素 MDA 控制疟疾的试验考虑单剂量伊维菌素。与三日疗法相比,单剂量疗法预计还会带来更多的操作优势,从而提高计划的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
期刊最新文献
Kinetics of Hepatitis B Virus replication in anti-HBc positive/HBsAg-negative people with HIV switching to Tenofovir sparing therapy. Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce influenza transmission in households: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections: A position paper of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2024 update. Total burden of hepatitis B and C attributed to injecting drug use in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021: Analyses based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Microbiological Aspects and Clinical Impact of Lower Lung Field Tuberculosis: an Observational Cohort Study in Peru.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1