Unveiling the nutritional spectrum: A comprehensive analysis of protein quality and antinutritional factors in three varieties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild)

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Chemistry: X Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101814
Maria Lilibeth Manzanilla-Valdez , Christine Boesch , Caroline Orfila , Sarita Montaño , Alan-Javier Hernández-Álvarez
{"title":"Unveiling the nutritional spectrum: A comprehensive analysis of protein quality and antinutritional factors in three varieties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild)","authors":"Maria Lilibeth Manzanilla-Valdez ,&nbsp;Christine Boesch ,&nbsp;Caroline Orfila ,&nbsp;Sarita Montaño ,&nbsp;Alan-Javier Hernández-Álvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quinoa (<em>Chenopodium quinoa</em>) is renowned for its high protein content and balanced amino acid profile. Despite promising protein characteristics, plant-based sources usually possess antinutritional factors (ANFs). This study aimed to analyze the nutritional and ANFs composition of three quinoa varieties (Black, Yellow, and Red), and assessed the protein quality. Among these varieties, Black quinoa showed the highest protein content (20.90 g/100 g) and total dietary fiber (TDF) (22.97 g/100 g). In contrast, Red quinoa exhibited the highest concentration of phenolic compounds (338.9 mg/100 g). The predominant ANFs identified included oxalates (ranging from 396.9 to 715.2 mg/100 g), saponins (83.27–96.82 g/100 g), and trypsin inhibitors (0.35–0.46 TUI/100 g). All three varieties showed similar <em>in vitro</em> protein digestibility (IVPD) (&gt; 76.9 %), while Black quinoa exhibited the highest protein quality. In conclusion to ensure reduction of ANFs, processing methods are necessary in order to fully benefit from the high protein and nutritional value of quinoa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12334,"journal":{"name":"Food Chemistry: X","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101814"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590157524007028/pdfft?md5=f07b080bb9123dfe5186f95f9e5cb3f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2590157524007028-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Chemistry: X","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590157524007028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) is renowned for its high protein content and balanced amino acid profile. Despite promising protein characteristics, plant-based sources usually possess antinutritional factors (ANFs). This study aimed to analyze the nutritional and ANFs composition of three quinoa varieties (Black, Yellow, and Red), and assessed the protein quality. Among these varieties, Black quinoa showed the highest protein content (20.90 g/100 g) and total dietary fiber (TDF) (22.97 g/100 g). In contrast, Red quinoa exhibited the highest concentration of phenolic compounds (338.9 mg/100 g). The predominant ANFs identified included oxalates (ranging from 396.9 to 715.2 mg/100 g), saponins (83.27–96.82 g/100 g), and trypsin inhibitors (0.35–0.46 TUI/100 g). All three varieties showed similar in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) (> 76.9 %), while Black quinoa exhibited the highest protein quality. In conclusion to ensure reduction of ANFs, processing methods are necessary in order to fully benefit from the high protein and nutritional value of quinoa.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开营养面纱:三个藜麦品种的蛋白质质量和抗营养因子综合分析
藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa)以蛋白质含量高、氨基酸组成均衡而闻名。尽管藜麦具有良好的蛋白质特性,但植物来源的藜麦通常含有抗营养因子(ANFs)。本研究旨在分析三个藜麦品种(黑藜、黄藜和红藜)的营养和抗营养因子成分,并评估其蛋白质质量。在这些品种中,黑藜麦的蛋白质含量(20.90 克/100 克)和总膳食纤维(22.97 克/100 克)最高。相比之下,红藜麦的酚类化合物含量最高(338.9 毫克/100 克)。鉴定出的主要 ANF 包括草酸盐(396.9-715.2 毫克/100 克)、皂苷(83.27-96.82 克/100 克)和胰蛋白酶抑制剂(0.35-0.46 TUI/100 克)。所有三个品种都表现出相似的体外蛋白质消化率(IVPD)(76.9%),而黑藜麦的蛋白质质量最高。总之,要确保减少 ANFs,必须采用加工方法,才能充分受益于藜麦的高蛋白和营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Chemistry: X
Food Chemistry: X CHEMISTRY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
315
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Food Chemistry: X, one of three Open Access companion journals to Food Chemistry, follows the same aims, scope, and peer-review process. It focuses on papers advancing food and biochemistry or analytical methods, prioritizing research novelty. Manuscript evaluation considers novelty, scientific rigor, field advancement, and reader interest. Excluded are studies on food molecular sciences or disease cure/prevention. Topics include food component chemistry, bioactives, processing effects, additives, contaminants, and analytical methods. The journal welcome Analytical Papers addressing food microbiology, sensory aspects, and more, emphasizing new methods with robust validation and applicability to diverse foods or regions.
期刊最新文献
Impact of ripening on the distribution of jackfruit polyphenol fractions and their inhibitory activities against metabolic enzymes Integrated GC–MS and UPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS untargeted metabolomics for the comprehensive identification of metabolites and characterization of metabolic pathways in key tissues of Cinnamomum cassia From chemical characterization to functional validation: Screening of anti-hyperglycemic components and their action mechanisms in differentially fermented teas Polysaccharides reinforced sesame oil body interface as 3D printing inks for dysphagia food: focusing on structural characteristics and rheological properties Comprehensive evaluation of thermal processing on the edible quality, flavor and starch properties of Chinese yam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1