{"title":"Enhancing machine learning thermobarometry for clinopyroxene-bearing magmas","authors":"Mónica Ágreda-López , Valerio Parodi , Alessandro Musu , Corin Jorgenson , Alessandro Carfì , Fulvio Mastrogiovanni , Luca Caricchi , Diego Perugini , Maurizio Petrelli","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we proposed a general workflow that aims to enhance the ML-based geothermobarometer modelling. Our workflow focuses on three key areas. Firstly, we developed a robust pre-processing pipeline that addresses data imbalance, feature engineering, and data augmentation. Secondly, we assessed modelling errors using a Monte Carlo approach to quantify the impact of analytical uncertainties on the final pressure and temperature estimates. Thirdly, we implemented a robust strategy to validate and test the ML models to avoid over- and under-fitting issues while correcting biases associated with the application of specific ML models (i.e., tree-based ensembles).</p><p>To facilitate the use of our workflow, we have developed a web app (<span><span>https://bit.ly/ml-pt-web</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and a Python module (<span><span>https://bit.ly/ml-pt-py</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). The robustness of this strategy has been tested on two calibrations: clinopyroxene (cpx) and clinopyroxene-liquid (cpx-liq). Our results show a significant reduction in errors compared to the baseline model, as well as good generalization ability on an independent external dataset. The Root Mean Squared Errors are 57 °C and 2.5 kbar for the cpx calibration, and 36 °C and 2.1 kbar for the cpx-liq calibration. Finally, our models show improved outcomes on the external dataset compared to existing ML and classical cpx and cpx-liq thermobarometers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55221,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Geosciences","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 105707"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300424001900/pdfft?md5=35a76aa189a72d9015dd976686c4e57f&pid=1-s2.0-S0098300424001900-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300424001900","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we proposed a general workflow that aims to enhance the ML-based geothermobarometer modelling. Our workflow focuses on three key areas. Firstly, we developed a robust pre-processing pipeline that addresses data imbalance, feature engineering, and data augmentation. Secondly, we assessed modelling errors using a Monte Carlo approach to quantify the impact of analytical uncertainties on the final pressure and temperature estimates. Thirdly, we implemented a robust strategy to validate and test the ML models to avoid over- and under-fitting issues while correcting biases associated with the application of specific ML models (i.e., tree-based ensembles).
To facilitate the use of our workflow, we have developed a web app (https://bit.ly/ml-pt-web) and a Python module (https://bit.ly/ml-pt-py). The robustness of this strategy has been tested on two calibrations: clinopyroxene (cpx) and clinopyroxene-liquid (cpx-liq). Our results show a significant reduction in errors compared to the baseline model, as well as good generalization ability on an independent external dataset. The Root Mean Squared Errors are 57 °C and 2.5 kbar for the cpx calibration, and 36 °C and 2.1 kbar for the cpx-liq calibration. Finally, our models show improved outcomes on the external dataset compared to existing ML and classical cpx and cpx-liq thermobarometers.
期刊介绍:
Computers & Geosciences publishes high impact, original research at the interface between Computer Sciences and Geosciences. Publications should apply modern computer science paradigms, whether computational or informatics-based, to address problems in the geosciences.