OnabotulinumtoxinA in Resistant Depression: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Facial Injection Sites (OnaDEP Study)

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1155/2024/1177925
Caroline Ceolato-Martin, Claire Chevallier-Collins, Jean-Pierre Clément, Eric Charles, Aurélie Lacroix, Danièle Ranoux
{"title":"OnabotulinumtoxinA in Resistant Depression: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Facial Injection Sites (OnaDEP Study)","authors":"Caroline Ceolato-Martin,&nbsp;Claire Chevallier-Collins,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Clément,&nbsp;Eric Charles,&nbsp;Aurélie Lacroix,&nbsp;Danièle Ranoux","doi":"10.1155/2024/1177925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnaA) injection in glabella area appears to be a promising treatment for major depression. However, one major concern of placebo-controlled studies on botulinum toxin injections is to ensure adequate blinding.</p>\n <p><b>Patients and Methods:</b> In this context, all subjects of this trial received the active product (OnaA). After randomization, 58 patients with resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) received OnaA either in the glabella area (<i>N</i> = 29) or in the crow’s feet area (<i>N</i> = 29). Subjects were blinded to the supposedly effective area against resistant depression and the examiner was not aware of the injected area. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of responders (50% or greater decrease in MADRS [Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale] score from baseline) in glabella group versus crow’s feet group at week 6 after the OnaA injection.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The number of responders was significantly higher in the glabella group than in the crow’s feet group with 13 responders out of 29 patients (44.8%) in the glabella group and five out of 28 patients (17.9%) in the crow’s feet group (<i>p</i> = 0.029). The rate of psychomotor agitation as measured by item 9 of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), associated with a shorter span of psychiatric disorder, was a potent positive predictive factor of positive response to treatment.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> We conclude that OnaA injected in the glabella muscles is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for MDD. We suggest that patients with a high score at item 9 of the HAM-D might be a subgroup of best responders. We assume that OnaA may act as a modulator of the activity of the primary sensorimotor cortex and then of the amygdala.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03484754</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1177925","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1177925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnaA) injection in glabella area appears to be a promising treatment for major depression. However, one major concern of placebo-controlled studies on botulinum toxin injections is to ensure adequate blinding.

Patients and Methods: In this context, all subjects of this trial received the active product (OnaA). After randomization, 58 patients with resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) received OnaA either in the glabella area (N = 29) or in the crow’s feet area (N = 29). Subjects were blinded to the supposedly effective area against resistant depression and the examiner was not aware of the injected area. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of responders (50% or greater decrease in MADRS [Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale] score from baseline) in glabella group versus crow’s feet group at week 6 after the OnaA injection.

Results: The number of responders was significantly higher in the glabella group than in the crow’s feet group with 13 responders out of 29 patients (44.8%) in the glabella group and five out of 28 patients (17.9%) in the crow’s feet group (p = 0.029). The rate of psychomotor agitation as measured by item 9 of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), associated with a shorter span of psychiatric disorder, was a potent positive predictive factor of positive response to treatment.

Conclusion: We conclude that OnaA injected in the glabella muscles is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for MDD. We suggest that patients with a high score at item 9 of the HAM-D might be a subgroup of best responders. We assume that OnaA may act as a modulator of the activity of the primary sensorimotor cortex and then of the amygdala.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03484754

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗药性抑郁症中的奥那巴妥妥烟酸:比较两种面部注射部位的随机试验(OnaDEP 研究)
背景:在面颊部注射肉毒杆菌毒素A(OnaA)似乎是一种治疗重度抑郁症的有效方法。然而,肉毒毒素注射安慰剂对照研究的一个主要问题是如何确保充分的盲法。 患者和方法:在这种情况下,本试验的所有受试者都接受了活性产品(OnaA)。经过随机分组后,58 名患有抗药性重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者接受了 OnaA 注射,注射部位为唇部(29 人)或鱼尾纹部位(29 人)。受试者对所谓的抗抑郁有效区域是盲注的,检查人员也不知道注射区域。主要结果指标是在注射奥那西普后第6周,眼周组与鱼尾纹组的应答者比例(MADRS(蒙哥马利和阿斯伯格抑郁量表)得分比基线下降50%或更多)。 结果唇部注射组的应答者人数明显多于鱼尾纹注射组,唇部注射组 29 名患者中有 13 名应答者(44.8%),鱼尾纹注射组 28 名患者中有 5 名应答者(17.9%)(p = 0.029)。汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)第 9 项所测量的精神运动性躁动率与较短的精神障碍时间有关,是对治疗产生积极反应的一个有力的正面预测因素。 结论我们得出的结论是,在臀部肌肉注射奥那阿是一种有效且耐受性良好的 MDD 治疗方法。我们认为,HAM-D 第 9 项得分较高的患者可能是最佳反应者的一个亚群。我们推测,OnaA可能是初级感觉运动皮层和杏仁核活动的调节剂。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03484754NCT03484754
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal Associations Between Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence, Early Adulthood, and Old Age: Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analyses Healthcare Utilization and Costs in Patients With Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders Compared With Those With Depression and Healthy Controls: A Nationwide Cohort Study The Pathologic Roles and Therapeutic Implications of Ghrelin/GHSR System in Mental Disorders Caregiver-Level Mental Health as a Contextual Effect in the Association Between Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Suicidal Ideation Among Adolescents: A Multilevel Analysis Developing the Fear of Disasters Scale and Exploring Its Psychometric Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1