Open strategy and the multinational firm

IF 2.2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Multinational Business Review Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1108/mbr-04-2024-0065
Christian Stadler, Julia Hautz, Thomas Ortner
{"title":"Open strategy and the multinational firm","authors":"Christian Stadler, Julia Hautz, Thomas Ortner","doi":"10.1108/mbr-04-2024-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Distance has been a core concept and issue in international business and management research. While scholars argue that distance through internationalization is increasing costs, distance is also associated with positive implications such as the integration of more diverse knowledge. Still, many firms struggle to manage distance effectively and efficiently in their multinational contexts. The purpose of this study therefore is to propose Open Strategy – increasing transparency and inclusion in the strategy process – as an attractive concept for managing distance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This is a conceptual paper where the authors introduce Open Strategy to the IB community.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors argue that opening the strategy of multinational enterprises, enables firms to leverage diversity by re-combining the firms diverse and distant knowledge. It also reduces distance by moving beyond formal mechanisms of control and coordination to improve joint understanding, cooperative commitment and strategy implementation. The framework shows how firms can move beyond established dogmas in international business research by rendering their strategy processes more open.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Leveraging the Open Strategy literature, the authors are able to find a way to respond to the challenge of increasing distance, in fact even arguing that distance can be beneficial if framed as diversity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46630,"journal":{"name":"Multinational Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multinational Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-04-2024-0065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Distance has been a core concept and issue in international business and management research. While scholars argue that distance through internationalization is increasing costs, distance is also associated with positive implications such as the integration of more diverse knowledge. Still, many firms struggle to manage distance effectively and efficiently in their multinational contexts. The purpose of this study therefore is to propose Open Strategy – increasing transparency and inclusion in the strategy process – as an attractive concept for managing distance.

Design/methodology/approach

This is a conceptual paper where the authors introduce Open Strategy to the IB community.

Findings

The authors argue that opening the strategy of multinational enterprises, enables firms to leverage diversity by re-combining the firms diverse and distant knowledge. It also reduces distance by moving beyond formal mechanisms of control and coordination to improve joint understanding, cooperative commitment and strategy implementation. The framework shows how firms can move beyond established dogmas in international business research by rendering their strategy processes more open.

Originality/value

Leveraging the Open Strategy literature, the authors are able to find a way to respond to the challenge of increasing distance, in fact even arguing that distance can be beneficial if framed as diversity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放战略与跨国公司
目的距离一直是国际商业和管理研究中的一个核心概念和问题。虽然学者们认为国际化带来的距离会增加成本,但距离也有积极的意义,比如整合更多不同的知识。然而,许多企业在跨国环境中仍难以有效和高效地管理距离。因此,本研究的目的是提出 "开放战略"--提高战略过程的透明度和包容性--作为管理距离的一个有吸引力的概念。研究结果作者认为,开放跨国企业的战略,使企业能够通过重新组合企业的多样化和远距离知识来利用多样性。它还超越了正式的控制和协调机制,增进了共同理解、合作承诺和战略实施,从而缩短了距离。该框架展示了企业如何通过使其战略流程更加开放,从而超越国际商业研究中的既定教条。原创性/价值作者利用开放战略文献,找到了应对距离增加这一挑战的方法,事实上,他们甚至认为,如果将距离设定为多样性,那么距离也是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.80%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Multinational Business Review publishes high quality and innovative peer-review research on the strategy, organization and performance of multinational enterprise (MNE), international business history, geography of international business, and the impact of international business on economic growth and development. The journal encourages papers that are cross-disciplinary in nature, and that address new and important issues in international business. Multinational Business Review also promotes research on under-represented regions such as Africa, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, and South East Asia and their MNEs, as well as under-studied topics such as the role of trade, investment and other public policies. Specific topics of interest include innovation and entrepreneurship in an international context; corporate governance and ownership; social, environmental and political risk; the role of multilateral institutions; and the nature of emerging market multinationals. The title seeks strong conceptual studies, contributing to the advancement of theories and frameworks, and sound empirical work, whether qualitative or quantitative, suggesting managerial, economic or government policy recommendations. The journal encourages replication studies that contribute to our understanding of the reliability and validity of current knowledge. Finally, Multinational Business Review welcomes proposals for perspectives pieces that offer critical and challenging viewpoints; surveys of the literature particularly those that use new and innovative bibliometric methods; and special issues on topics of relevance to Multinational Business Review.
期刊最新文献
Open strategy and the multinational firm Improving the credibility of case study research in international business studies and beyond: a simple fix for a serious problem Towards environmental impact of inward foreign direct investment: the moderating role of varieties of democracy Ownership share in cross-border acquisitions: does high-tech status of the target matter? Future directions of R&D internationalization in international business
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1