The new generationalism: Generational antagonism and partisan polarization

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Forum Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/socf.13017
Andrew M. Lindner
{"title":"The new generationalism: Generational antagonism and partisan polarization","authors":"Andrew M. Lindner","doi":"10.1111/socf.13017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the prevalence of generational labels like Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z in popular discourse, most studies of generationalism have been restricted to content analyses of generational rhetoric. This study investigates the prevalence of negative generationalism, or negative affective sentiment towards perceived generational out‐groups within the US public and considers how it may be linked with partisan political identities. Using a nationally representative survey of 1232 Americans, this research examines the association between generational self‐identity and partisan identity using feeling thermometer scores for four generational groups (Boomers, Gen Xers, Millennials, and Gen Z) and the two major political parties (Democrats and Republicans). I also report the findings of an experimental manipulation testing the extent to which generational priming exacerbates affective partisan polarization. The results reveal strong evidence of positive affect towards one's generational in‐group, but a less consistent pattern of negative generationalism. Neither the correlational nor the experimental outcomes support a strong and consistent link between generationalism and partisanship, though Republicans feel significantly warmer towards Baby Boomers and colder towards Gen Z than independents. Despite the largely null findings concerning partisanship, this study reveals that these generational labels do appear to bear some degree of social meaning as social identities for people, pointing to new directions for future sociological research on generationalism.","PeriodicalId":21904,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Forum","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.13017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of generational labels like Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z in popular discourse, most studies of generationalism have been restricted to content analyses of generational rhetoric. This study investigates the prevalence of negative generationalism, or negative affective sentiment towards perceived generational out‐groups within the US public and considers how it may be linked with partisan political identities. Using a nationally representative survey of 1232 Americans, this research examines the association between generational self‐identity and partisan identity using feeling thermometer scores for four generational groups (Boomers, Gen Xers, Millennials, and Gen Z) and the two major political parties (Democrats and Republicans). I also report the findings of an experimental manipulation testing the extent to which generational priming exacerbates affective partisan polarization. The results reveal strong evidence of positive affect towards one's generational in‐group, but a less consistent pattern of negative generationalism. Neither the correlational nor the experimental outcomes support a strong and consistent link between generationalism and partisanship, though Republicans feel significantly warmer towards Baby Boomers and colder towards Gen Z than independents. Despite the largely null findings concerning partisanship, this study reveals that these generational labels do appear to bear some degree of social meaning as social identities for people, pointing to new directions for future sociological research on generationalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新世代主义:代际对立与党派两极分化
尽管 "潮一代"、"X 代"、"千禧一代 "和 "Z 代 "等代际标签在流行话语中十分普遍,但大多数关于代际主义的研究仅限于对代际修辞的内容分析。本研究调查了美国公众中普遍存在的消极代际主义,即对所认为的代际外群体的消极情感情绪,并探讨了这种情绪与党派政治身份之间的联系。通过对 1232 名美国人进行具有全国代表性的调查,本研究使用四个世代群体(Boomers、Gen Xers、Millennials 和 Gen Z)和两大政党(民主党和共和党)的感觉温度计得分,研究了世代自我认同与党派认同之间的关联。我还报告了一项实验操作的结果,该操作测试了代际引物在多大程度上加剧了情感上的党派两极分化。结果显示,有强有力的证据表明,一个人对自己的代际内群体产生了积极的情感,但消极的代际主义模式却不那么一致。相关结果和实验结果都不支持代际主义和党派主义之间强烈而一致的联系,尽管共和党人对婴儿潮一代的感觉明显比无党派人士温暖,而对 Z 世代的感觉则明显比无党派人士冷淡。尽管有关党派倾向的研究结果基本为空,但本研究揭示了这些代际标签作为人们的社会身份似乎确实具有一定程度的社会意义,为未来有关代际主义的社会学研究指明了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Forum
Sociological Forum SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Sociological Forum is the flagship journal of the Eastern Sociological Society. The journal is peer reviewed and committed to publishing high quality, cutting edge research on substantive issues of fundamental importance to the study of society. The journal"s mission is broad in scope, encompassing empirical works (both quantitative and qualitative in nature), as well as works that develop theories, concepts, and methodological strategies. All areas of sociology and related fields are welcomed in Sociological Forum, as the journal strives to create a site of learning and exchange for scholars and students of the social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Kids in limbo: War, uncertainty, and the school experiences of Ukrainian refugee students in Poland Know your place: Fractured epistemic privilege among women in state organizations Dividing paradise: Rural inequality and the diminishing American dream By JenniferSherman, Oakland, CA: University of California Press. 2021. pp. 288. $29.95 (pbk). ISBN: 9780520305137 Educational inequality as a consequence and cause of race The contribution of intimate partner violence to socioeconomic inequality among Black, Latina, and White women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1