Understanding superlinear speedup in current HPC architectures

Flavio Cesar Cunha Galeazzo, R. Gregor Weiß, Sergey Lesnik, Henrik Rusche, Andreas Ruopp
{"title":"Understanding superlinear speedup in current HPC architectures","authors":"Flavio Cesar Cunha Galeazzo, R. Gregor Weiß, Sergey Lesnik, Henrik Rusche, Andreas Ruopp","doi":"10.1088/1757-899x/1312/1/012009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of OpenFOAM in strong scaling tests on HPC systems with AMD EPYC processors exhibits a pronounced superlinear speedup. Simple test cases show superlinear speedups of over 300%, which significantly impacts the efficient use of computing resources.With the last generation of HPC architectures, a superlinear speedup of about 10% to 20% was well expected and accepted by CFD users [1]. The measured superlinear speedup is much more pronounced and withstands the communication overhead to even larger scales.A detailed performance analysis of OpenFOAM follows, employing various High-Performance Computing (HPC) architectures, including AMD, ARM and Intel systems. The performance metric FVOPS (Finite VOlumes solved Per Second) is introduced to compare the performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) applications when varying the grid size, as occurs in a strong scaling test. The achievable FVOPS depends on various factors, including the simulation type, boundary conditions, and especially the grid size of a use case. Analysing FVOPS on a single node level with varying grid size shows a significant difference in performance and cache utilization, which explains the large superlinear speedups seen in the strong scaling tests.Furthermore, FVOPS can be used as a simple benchmark to determine the optimal number of grid elements per rank to simulate a given use case at peak efficiency on a given platform, resulting in time, energy, and cost savings.The FVOPS metric also facilitates the direct comparison between different HPC architectures. The tests using AMD, ARM, and Intel processors show a peak in performance when employing around 10,000 grid elements per core. The presence of a large L3 cache on AMD processors is particularly advantageous, as indicated by L3 cache miss rates observed on AMD EPYC processors. Our results suggest that future HPC architectures with larger caches and higher memory bandwidth would benefit the CFD community.","PeriodicalId":14483,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1312/1/012009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of OpenFOAM in strong scaling tests on HPC systems with AMD EPYC processors exhibits a pronounced superlinear speedup. Simple test cases show superlinear speedups of over 300%, which significantly impacts the efficient use of computing resources.With the last generation of HPC architectures, a superlinear speedup of about 10% to 20% was well expected and accepted by CFD users [1]. The measured superlinear speedup is much more pronounced and withstands the communication overhead to even larger scales.A detailed performance analysis of OpenFOAM follows, employing various High-Performance Computing (HPC) architectures, including AMD, ARM and Intel systems. The performance metric FVOPS (Finite VOlumes solved Per Second) is introduced to compare the performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) applications when varying the grid size, as occurs in a strong scaling test. The achievable FVOPS depends on various factors, including the simulation type, boundary conditions, and especially the grid size of a use case. Analysing FVOPS on a single node level with varying grid size shows a significant difference in performance and cache utilization, which explains the large superlinear speedups seen in the strong scaling tests.Furthermore, FVOPS can be used as a simple benchmark to determine the optimal number of grid elements per rank to simulate a given use case at peak efficiency on a given platform, resulting in time, energy, and cost savings.The FVOPS metric also facilitates the direct comparison between different HPC architectures. The tests using AMD, ARM, and Intel processors show a peak in performance when employing around 10,000 grid elements per core. The presence of a large L3 cache on AMD processors is particularly advantageous, as indicated by L3 cache miss rates observed on AMD EPYC processors. Our results suggest that future HPC architectures with larger caches and higher memory bandwidth would benefit the CFD community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解当前高性能计算体系结构中的超线性加速功能
在采用 AMD EPYC 处理器的高性能计算系统上进行的强扩展测试中,OpenFOAM 的性能表现出明显的超线性加速。简单的测试案例显示超线性加速超过300%,这极大地影响了计算资源的有效利用。在上一代高性能计算架构中,10%到20%左右的超线性加速是CFD用户所期待和接受的[1]。接下来将对 OpenFOAM 进行详细的性能分析,并采用各种高性能计算(HPC)架构,包括 AMD、ARM 和英特尔系统。性能指标 FVOPS(每秒求解的有限体积)用于比较计算流体力学(CFD)应用在改变网格大小时的性能,这在强扩展测试中经常出现。可实现的 FVOPS 取决于各种因素,包括模拟类型、边界条件,尤其是使用案例的网格大小。此外,FVOPS 还可作为一个简单的基准,用于确定在特定平台上以最高效率模拟特定用例的每级网格元素的最佳数量,从而节省时间、能源和成本。使用 AMD、ARM 和英特尔处理器进行的测试表明,当每个内核使用约 10,000 个网格元素时,性能达到峰值。AMD EPYC 处理器的 L3 高速缓存未命中率表明,AMD 处理器的大型 L3 高速缓存尤其具有优势。我们的研究结果表明,未来具有更大缓存和更高内存带宽的高性能计算架构将使 CFD 界受益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fluid-structure interaction modeling of dry wire drawing by coupling OpenFOAM models of lubricant film and metal wire 1D and 2D porous media fixed bed reactor simulations with DUO: Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) validation test Evaluation of a carbon dioxide fish barrier with OpenFOAM Open source tools for OpenFOAM - Adaptive mesh refinement and convergence detection Vertical axis turbine simulations based on sliding and overset meshes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1