Comparative clinical study of Mist Amen Fevermix and Edhec Malacure: two polyherbal products used for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ghana against Artemether/Lumefantrine

Bernard K. Turkson, Isaac K. Amponsah, Alfred Ofori Agyemang, Merlin L. K. Mensah, Reinhard I. Nketia, Desmond Nkrumah, Michael F. Baidoo, Abraham Y. Mensah, Emmanuel Achaab, Burnett Tetteh Accam
{"title":"Comparative clinical study of Mist Amen Fevermix and Edhec Malacure: two polyherbal products used for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ghana against Artemether/Lumefantrine","authors":"Bernard K. Turkson, Isaac K. Amponsah, Alfred Ofori Agyemang, Merlin L. K. Mensah, Reinhard I. Nketia, Desmond Nkrumah, Michael F. Baidoo, Abraham Y. Mensah, Emmanuel Achaab, Burnett Tetteh Accam","doi":"10.1186/s40816-024-00373-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of herbal products for the treatment of malaria, has increased globally. However, inadequate scientific studies about the safety and effectiveness of such herbal products have been raised. Also, the reduced sensitivity of the malaria parasites to artemisinin-based combination therapies is of concern. There is therefore the need for new antimalarial medications including those from alternative sources such as herbal medicinal products. In this study, a prospective, comparative parallel group randomized, clinical study was done to assess the safety and effectiveness of Mist Amen Fevermix and Mist Edhec Malacure with Artemether/Lumefantrine as control at the Tafo Government Hospital, Kumasi between July and November 2019, after Committee on Human Research, Publication and Ethics approval (CHRPE/AP/424/19). The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical and Laboratory Practice (GCLP) and registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry with trial number PACTR202109664146698. Participant completed an informed consent form. Randomization was based on a single sequence to allocate participants to a group. SPSS version 19. One-way ANOVA test and exploratory statistics was used for data analysis. Total sample size was 150 participants with 50 on each arm of the group. Male and female patients aged 15–45 years and meet inclusion criteria with clinically established malaria were treated with Mist Amen Fevermix and Mist Edhec Malacure, at the specified doses of 45 mls (0.1063 g) and 30 mls (0.0521 g) three times daily after meals for three days. Artemether/Lumefantrine was administered at a dose of 80/480 mg/kg twice daily after meals for three days. Baseline data was taken on day 0. Patients were then followed up on Day 3, 7 and 28 to establish treatment outcomes and any side effect using a checklist for signs and symptoms and Karnofsky’s scale to assess the quality of life. Mist Amen Fevermix was effective with a cure rate of 95.89%. Mist Edhec Malacure was also effective with a cure rate of 91.87%. The cure rate of Artemether/Lumefantrine was 97.25%. Kidney and liver panels were within normal reference range at the end of the 28-day study. This study supports the use of Mist Amen Fevermix and Mist Edhec Malacure, two multi-component products as safe and effective for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Both products achieved a comparable clinical treatment outcome with Artemether/Lumefantrine.","PeriodicalId":10462,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Phytoscience","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Phytoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-024-00373-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of herbal products for the treatment of malaria, has increased globally. However, inadequate scientific studies about the safety and effectiveness of such herbal products have been raised. Also, the reduced sensitivity of the malaria parasites to artemisinin-based combination therapies is of concern. There is therefore the need for new antimalarial medications including those from alternative sources such as herbal medicinal products. In this study, a prospective, comparative parallel group randomized, clinical study was done to assess the safety and effectiveness of Mist Amen Fevermix and Mist Edhec Malacure with Artemether/Lumefantrine as control at the Tafo Government Hospital, Kumasi between July and November 2019, after Committee on Human Research, Publication and Ethics approval (CHRPE/AP/424/19). The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical and Laboratory Practice (GCLP) and registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry with trial number PACTR202109664146698. Participant completed an informed consent form. Randomization was based on a single sequence to allocate participants to a group. SPSS version 19. One-way ANOVA test and exploratory statistics was used for data analysis. Total sample size was 150 participants with 50 on each arm of the group. Male and female patients aged 15–45 years and meet inclusion criteria with clinically established malaria were treated with Mist Amen Fevermix and Mist Edhec Malacure, at the specified doses of 45 mls (0.1063 g) and 30 mls (0.0521 g) three times daily after meals for three days. Artemether/Lumefantrine was administered at a dose of 80/480 mg/kg twice daily after meals for three days. Baseline data was taken on day 0. Patients were then followed up on Day 3, 7 and 28 to establish treatment outcomes and any side effect using a checklist for signs and symptoms and Karnofsky’s scale to assess the quality of life. Mist Amen Fevermix was effective with a cure rate of 95.89%. Mist Edhec Malacure was also effective with a cure rate of 91.87%. The cure rate of Artemether/Lumefantrine was 97.25%. Kidney and liver panels were within normal reference range at the end of the 28-day study. This study supports the use of Mist Amen Fevermix and Mist Edhec Malacure, two multi-component products as safe and effective for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Both products achieved a comparable clinical treatment outcome with Artemether/Lumefantrine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mist Amen Fevermix 和 Edhec Malacure:加纳用于治疗无并发症疟疾的两种多草药产品与蒿甲醚/本芴醇的临床比较研究
全球使用草药产品治疗疟疾的情况有所增加。然而,有关此类草药产品安全性和有效性的科学研究不足。此外,疟原虫对青蒿素类复方疗法的敏感性降低也令人担忧。因此,有必要开发新的抗疟药物,包括来自草药等替代来源的药物。在本研究中,经人类研究、出版和伦理委员会批准(CHRPE/AP/424/19),于2019年7月至11月期间在库马西的Tafo政府医院进行了一项前瞻性、平行组随机比较临床研究,以评估Mist Amen Fevermix和Mist Edhec Malacure与作为对照的蒿甲醚/乐凡啶的安全性和有效性。该研究按照良好临床和实验室规范(GCLP)进行,并在泛非临床试验注册中心注册,试验编号为PACTR202109664146698。参与者填写了知情同意书。随机分组采用单一序列。采用 SPSS 19 版本。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和探索性统计。样本总数为 150 人,每组各 50 人。年龄在 15-45 岁之间且符合纳入标准的临床确诊疟疾男女患者接受了雾化蒿甲醚 Fevermix 和雾化 Edhec Malacure 治疗,剂量分别为 45 毫升(0.1063 克)和 30 毫升(0.0521 克),每日三次,饭后服用,连续三天。蒿甲醚/Lumefantrine的剂量为80/480毫克/千克,每天两次,饭后服用,连续三天。第 0 天采集基线数据。然后在第3天、第7天和第28天对患者进行随访,使用症状和体征检查表以及卡诺夫斯基量表评估生活质量,以确定治疗效果和任何副作用。Amen Fevermix喷雾剂疗效显著,治愈率达95.89%。Edhec Malacure喷雾剂也很有效,治愈率为91.87%。蒿甲醚/Lumefantrine的治愈率为97.25%。28 天研究结束时,肾脏和肝脏检查结果均在正常参考范围内。这项研究支持使用 Mist Amen Fevermix 和 Mist Edhec Malacure 这两种多组分产品安全有效地治疗无并发症疟疾。这两种产品的临床治疗效果与蒿甲醚/本芴醇相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Phytoscience is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, and open access journal publishing high quality research articles on clinical evidence and use of medicinal plants in the development of efficient and well tolerated phytotherapy. Clinical Phytoscience focuses on phytotherapy, looking at proof of concept, efficacy and safety, to be established “at eye level” compared to pharmacotherapy. The emphasis lies on application oriented topics (efficacy and safety of phytotherapy in a specific indication, including its need and acceptance by the patient). The scientific results published in the journal should contribute to the recovery and maintenance of human health by phytotherapy. Clinical Phytoscience will publish high-quality evidence-based clinical studies and relevant pharmacological studies. Key areas of interest are: -Upper and lower airways, ENT and pneumology -Gynecology -Urology -Nephrology Pediatrics -Intestinal tract -Hepatology -Diabetes/metabolic Syndrome -Immunology and microbiology -Hygiene -Analytics
期刊最新文献
Bioassay guided isolation and compounds identification of the anti-diabetic fractions of (rosemary) Rosmarinus officinalis leaves extract In-Vitro evaluation of antidiabetic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities in Mucuna pruriens seed extract Potentilla fulgens Wall. Ex sims. Upregulates insulin receptor substrate 1 and Akt in alloxan-induced diabetic mice Comparative clinical study of Mist Amen Fevermix and Edhec Malacure: two polyherbal products used for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ghana against Artemether/Lumefantrine In vitro antiproliferative activities of some Ghanaian medicinal plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1