Evaluating Antibiotics Misuse and Cost Analysis among Hospitalized Dengue Virus Infected Adults: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae520
Thundon Ngamprasertchai, Ashley Siribhadra, Chayanis Kositamongkol, Pittaya Piroonamornpun, Piyanan Pakdeewut, Viravarn Luvira, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan
{"title":"Evaluating Antibiotics Misuse and Cost Analysis among Hospitalized Dengue Virus Infected Adults: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Thundon Ngamprasertchai, Ashley Siribhadra, Chayanis Kositamongkol, Pittaya Piroonamornpun, Piyanan Pakdeewut, Viravarn Luvira, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Dengue is a prevalent cause of acute febrile illness, predominantly in Asia, where it necessitates supportive care without the need for antibiotics. This study aims to evaluate antibiotics usage and analyze the hospitalization costs among adults infected with the dengue virus. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Thailand, in 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed all adult cases with confirmed dengue from 2016 to 2021. Determinants of inappropriateness were analyzed using Poisson regression. Results The study included 249 participants with over half presenting with severe dengue or dengue with warning signs upon admission. The cumulative incidence of antibiotics use was 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.23–10.47), predominantly involving empirical treatment strategies. Ceftriaxone and doxycycline were the most frequently prescribed antibiotics. Notably, patients who received empirical antibiotics showed no definite or presumed bacterial infections. Among those who received definite strategies, inappropriate durations, including both short treatments and the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, were observed. A private ward admission was identified as a significant predictor of inappropriate use, with an incidence rate ratio of 4.15 (95% CI: 1.16–14.82) compared to ICU admission. Direct medical costs did not differ significantly between appropriate and inappropriate uses. Conclusions The incidence of antibiotic use among dengue cases was moderate; however, inappropriate use by indications were mainly observed. Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) strategies should be encouraged, particularly in dengue with warning signs, admitted to general or private ward. Direct medical costs between appropriate and inappropriate uses were comparable.","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Dengue is a prevalent cause of acute febrile illness, predominantly in Asia, where it necessitates supportive care without the need for antibiotics. This study aims to evaluate antibiotics usage and analyze the hospitalization costs among adults infected with the dengue virus. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Thailand, in 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed all adult cases with confirmed dengue from 2016 to 2021. Determinants of inappropriateness were analyzed using Poisson regression. Results The study included 249 participants with over half presenting with severe dengue or dengue with warning signs upon admission. The cumulative incidence of antibiotics use was 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.23–10.47), predominantly involving empirical treatment strategies. Ceftriaxone and doxycycline were the most frequently prescribed antibiotics. Notably, patients who received empirical antibiotics showed no definite or presumed bacterial infections. Among those who received definite strategies, inappropriate durations, including both short treatments and the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, were observed. A private ward admission was identified as a significant predictor of inappropriate use, with an incidence rate ratio of 4.15 (95% CI: 1.16–14.82) compared to ICU admission. Direct medical costs did not differ significantly between appropriate and inappropriate uses. Conclusions The incidence of antibiotic use among dengue cases was moderate; however, inappropriate use by indications were mainly observed. Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) strategies should be encouraged, particularly in dengue with warning signs, admitted to general or private ward. Direct medical costs between appropriate and inappropriate uses were comparable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估成人登革热病毒感染者住院期间的抗生素滥用和成本分析:回顾性队列研究的启示
背景登革热是急性发热性疾病的一种常见病因,主要发生在亚洲,患者只需接受支持性治疗,无需使用抗生素。本研究旨在评估抗生素的使用情况,并分析感染登革热病毒的成人的住院费用。方法 这项回顾性队列研究于 2022 年在泰国热带病医院进行。两名独立审查员对 2016 年至 2021 年期间所有确诊登革热的成人病例进行了评估。使用泊松回归分析了不适当性的决定因素。结果 研究纳入了 249 名参与者,其中一半以上在入院时出现严重登革热或登革热警示症状。抗生素使用的累计发生率为 9.3%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:8.23-10.47),主要涉及经验性治疗策略。头孢曲松和强力霉素是最常用的抗生素。值得注意的是,接受经验性抗生素治疗的患者没有明确或推测的细菌感染。在接受确诊治疗的患者中,发现了不恰当的用药时间,包括短期治疗和过度使用广谱抗生素。与入住重症监护室相比,入住私人病房是不适当使用抗生素的一个重要预测因素,其发生率比为 4.15(95% CI:1.16-14.82)。直接医疗成本在合理使用和不当使用之间没有明显差异。结论 登革热病例中抗生素使用率适中,但主要存在适应症使用不当的情况。应鼓励采取抗菌药物管理(AMS)策略,尤其是对有预警征兆、住在普通病房或私人病房的登革热患者。适当使用和不适当使用的直接医疗成本相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Low Prevalence of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Resistance-Associated Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Lineages From Botswana. A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Clostridioides difficile Infection. Has Ghana's Rotavirus Vaccine Switch Met Programmatic Expectations? An Analysis of National Surveillance Data; 2018-2022. Impact of COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Bordetella pertussis, Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Influenza Virus, and Seasonal Coronavirus Antibody Levels: A Systematic Review. Severe Optic Neuropathy Induced by Very Prolonged Tedizolid as Suppressive Therapy: Description of a Case Report and Implication for Better Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1