Comprehensive Assessment of Lipid Markers in Cardiovascular Events Prediction

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International heart journal Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1536/ihj.24-149
Naoya Inoue, Shuji Morikawa, Toyoaki Murohara
{"title":"Comprehensive Assessment of Lipid Markers in Cardiovascular Events Prediction","authors":"Naoya Inoue, Shuji Morikawa, Toyoaki Murohara","doi":"10.1536/ihj.24-149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>Many studies have reported a relationship between various lipids, such as cholesterol, fatty acids, and lipoproteins, and cardiovascular events. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is often cited as a representative marker. However, there is still room for discussion regarding which markers, among other lipids, should take clinical precedence.</p><p>This observational study focused on patients without residual stenosis on post-coronary angiography. It was based on blood tests, including lipid profiles at that time, and assessed the association with the subsequent occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization due to heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and all revascularizations).</p><p>Of the 375 patients analyzed, 134 experienced MACE (median follow-up duration: 1031 days). When comparing the MACE and non-MACE groups, significant differences were observed in lipid markers such as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) (non-HDL-C; <i>P</i> = 0.003, RLP-C; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, the area under the curve for RLP-C was 0.656 (95% CI: 0.598-0.714). Improvement in MACE risk discrimination was observed when LDL-C was replaced with non-HDL-C or RLP-C, in addition to atherosclerosis risk factors (non-HDL-C; net reclassification improvement (NRI) = 0.366, 95% CI: 0.159-0.572, RLP-C; NRI = 0.224, 95% CI: 0.016-0.433).</p><p>It is highly likely that non-HDL-C and RLP-C can serve as significant lipid markers for predicting the occurrence of MACE.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have reported a relationship between various lipids, such as cholesterol, fatty acids, and lipoproteins, and cardiovascular events. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is often cited as a representative marker. However, there is still room for discussion regarding which markers, among other lipids, should take clinical precedence.

This observational study focused on patients without residual stenosis on post-coronary angiography. It was based on blood tests, including lipid profiles at that time, and assessed the association with the subsequent occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization due to heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and all revascularizations).

Of the 375 patients analyzed, 134 experienced MACE (median follow-up duration: 1031 days). When comparing the MACE and non-MACE groups, significant differences were observed in lipid markers such as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) (non-HDL-C; P = 0.003, RLP-C; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the area under the curve for RLP-C was 0.656 (95% CI: 0.598-0.714). Improvement in MACE risk discrimination was observed when LDL-C was replaced with non-HDL-C or RLP-C, in addition to atherosclerosis risk factors (non-HDL-C; net reclassification improvement (NRI) = 0.366, 95% CI: 0.159-0.572, RLP-C; NRI = 0.224, 95% CI: 0.016-0.433).

It is highly likely that non-HDL-C and RLP-C can serve as significant lipid markers for predicting the occurrence of MACE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全面评估心血管事件预测中的血脂指标
许多研究都报告了各种血脂(如胆固醇、脂肪酸和脂蛋白)与心血管事件之间的关系。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)通常被认为是具有代表性的标志物。这项观察性研究的重点是冠状动脉造影术后无残余狭窄的患者。这项观察性研究主要针对冠状动脉造影术后无残余狭窄的患者,以当时的血液检测(包括血脂情况)为基础,评估其与随后发生的主要不良心血管事件(MACE,全因死亡率、心力衰竭住院、心肌梗死、中风和所有血管再通术的综合)之间的关系。在分析的 375 例患者中,134 例发生了 MACE(中位随访时间:1031 天)。在比较MACE组和非MACE组时,观察到非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)和残余样颗粒胆固醇(RLP-C)等血脂指标存在显著差异(non-HDL-C;P = 0.003,RLP-C;P < 0.001)。此外,RLP-C的曲线下面积为0.656(95% CI:0.598-0.714)。除动脉粥样硬化风险因素外,用非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇或高密度脂蛋白胆固醇替代低密度脂蛋白胆固醇时,MACE 风险分辨能力也有所提高(非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇;净再分类改进(NRI)= 0.366,95% CI:0.159-0.572;高密度脂蛋白胆固醇;NRI= 0.224,95% CI:0.016-0.433)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
期刊最新文献
Animal Experimental Study of Bioabsorbable Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Colchicine Prevents Cardiac Rupture in Mice with Myocardial Infarction by Inhibiting P53-Dependent Apoptosis Identification of the Neointimal Hyperplasia-Related LncRNA-mRNA-Immune Cell Regulatory Network in a Rat Carotid Artery Balloon Injury Model A Case of Aortopulmonary Fistula with Post-Operative Aortic Pseudoaneurysm Diagnosed by Transesophageal Echocardiography Different Impact of Immunosuppressive Therapy on Cardiac Outcomes in Systemic Versus Isolated Cardiac Sarcoidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1