K-Pop Dance: Fandoming Yourself on Social Media by Chuyun Oh (review)

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 ASIAN STUDIES ASIAN THEATRE JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1353/atj.2024.a936947
Emily Wilcox
{"title":"K-Pop Dance: Fandoming Yourself on Social Media by Chuyun Oh (review)","authors":"Emily Wilcox","doi":"10.1353/atj.2024.a936947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>K-Pop Dance: Fandoming Yourself on Social Media</em> by Chuyun Oh <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Emily Wilcox </li> </ul> <em>K-POP DANCE: FANDOMING YOURSELF ON SOCIAL MEDIA</em>. By Chuyun Oh. New York: Routledge, 2023. x + 184 pp. Softcover, $42.36. <p>Anyone teaching in Asian studies, performance studies, or media studies today knows that K-pop is a hugely popular subject among college students, and research on the topic is in high demand. Chuyun Oh’s book perfectly meets this need, especially for research on K-pop dance, a relatively understudied component of the broader K-pop genre. Oh’s book examines K-pop dance from multiple perspectives—as social media dance, as modern dance choreography, as intercultural performance and identify formation, as social engagement, and as fandom. Written in a highly accessible manner while being firmly grounded in an impressive array of critical performance and cultural theory discourses, <em>K-pop Dance</em> offers a stimulating and highly original contribution to the study of South Korean popular dance in global contexts.</p> <p>The book is organized into two parts that map onto the two major contributions of the project. In “Part I: K-pop Dance,” Oh examines K-pop dance as a choreographic genre, with an emphasis on performance aesthetics, training, and the history and circulation of K-pop dance by professional artists in commercial contexts. In “Part II: K-pop Dance Fandom,” Oh turns to K-pop dance as a practice of international fandom among amateurs including refugees, young adults, and college students, with a focus on themes of identity passing, cross-cultural experiences, and aspirations of social mobility. The first half of the book centers mainly on artists based in Asia, primarily in <strong>[End Page 456]</strong> South Korea but also with one case study of an artist in Vietnam. The second half of the book looks primarily at fans either from or based in the United States. The backgrounds of the dancers discussed in this latter section are quite diverse, including Asian Americans, a Latinx American, and a South Korean international student studying in San Diego, California, a white American student studying abroad in Japan, and a group of refugee teens from Thailand at a community center in Utica, New York. Despite the seemingly disparate contexts and topics explored, the book is united by two related themes: an effort to treat K-pop dance seriously as an artistic and cultural practice with its own aesthetic aims and a specific media and industrial context, and a respect for the labor of fans and the complexity of their diverse intersectional identities, desires, and experiences as they engage with K-pop from a variety of positionalities and privileges.</p> <p>Methodologically, Oh combines multi-sited ethnography (including on-site participant observation, interviews, and social media ethnography), choreographic analysis (mainly of performance videos from television, TikTok, and YouTube), and, to a lesser extent, auto-ethnography and performance ethnography. The deepest ethnographic engagements appear in Chapter 6 and the Epilogue, which examine Oh’s work with refugee teens at the Midtown Utica Community Center in upstate New York. As Oh explains, this is where her work with K-pop cover dancers<sup>1</sup> first began in 2016, when she “was teaching a performance ethnography class and looking for a local community center for a student field trip” (p. 143). Oh’s work with the center and its teens spanned many years and demonstrates her commitment to dance as a mode of social engagement and transdiasporic community. Compared to the other two ethnographic chapters (Chapters 4 and 5), these two about her work with the center convey the most nuance and self-reflexivity. This is likely a result of the long-term nature of Oh’s involvement with the center. This contrasts with the distanced and at times somewhat more superficial accounts of the university cover dance teams in San Diego, where her role was as an observer and visitor rather than a direct long-term participant.</p> <p>Throughout the book, Oh makes a passionate and convincing case for the complexity of K-pop dance and its importance as an academic subject of study. Oh’s elaboration of the main aesthetic features of K-pop dance through the concept of what she calls “gestural point...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42841,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2024.a936947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • K-Pop Dance: Fandoming Yourself on Social Media by Chuyun Oh
  • Emily Wilcox
K-POP DANCE: FANDOMING YOURSELF ON SOCIAL MEDIA. By Chuyun Oh. New York: Routledge, 2023. x + 184 pp. Softcover, $42.36.

Anyone teaching in Asian studies, performance studies, or media studies today knows that K-pop is a hugely popular subject among college students, and research on the topic is in high demand. Chuyun Oh’s book perfectly meets this need, especially for research on K-pop dance, a relatively understudied component of the broader K-pop genre. Oh’s book examines K-pop dance from multiple perspectives—as social media dance, as modern dance choreography, as intercultural performance and identify formation, as social engagement, and as fandom. Written in a highly accessible manner while being firmly grounded in an impressive array of critical performance and cultural theory discourses, K-pop Dance offers a stimulating and highly original contribution to the study of South Korean popular dance in global contexts.

The book is organized into two parts that map onto the two major contributions of the project. In “Part I: K-pop Dance,” Oh examines K-pop dance as a choreographic genre, with an emphasis on performance aesthetics, training, and the history and circulation of K-pop dance by professional artists in commercial contexts. In “Part II: K-pop Dance Fandom,” Oh turns to K-pop dance as a practice of international fandom among amateurs including refugees, young adults, and college students, with a focus on themes of identity passing, cross-cultural experiences, and aspirations of social mobility. The first half of the book centers mainly on artists based in Asia, primarily in [End Page 456] South Korea but also with one case study of an artist in Vietnam. The second half of the book looks primarily at fans either from or based in the United States. The backgrounds of the dancers discussed in this latter section are quite diverse, including Asian Americans, a Latinx American, and a South Korean international student studying in San Diego, California, a white American student studying abroad in Japan, and a group of refugee teens from Thailand at a community center in Utica, New York. Despite the seemingly disparate contexts and topics explored, the book is united by two related themes: an effort to treat K-pop dance seriously as an artistic and cultural practice with its own aesthetic aims and a specific media and industrial context, and a respect for the labor of fans and the complexity of their diverse intersectional identities, desires, and experiences as they engage with K-pop from a variety of positionalities and privileges.

Methodologically, Oh combines multi-sited ethnography (including on-site participant observation, interviews, and social media ethnography), choreographic analysis (mainly of performance videos from television, TikTok, and YouTube), and, to a lesser extent, auto-ethnography and performance ethnography. The deepest ethnographic engagements appear in Chapter 6 and the Epilogue, which examine Oh’s work with refugee teens at the Midtown Utica Community Center in upstate New York. As Oh explains, this is where her work with K-pop cover dancers1 first began in 2016, when she “was teaching a performance ethnography class and looking for a local community center for a student field trip” (p. 143). Oh’s work with the center and its teens spanned many years and demonstrates her commitment to dance as a mode of social engagement and transdiasporic community. Compared to the other two ethnographic chapters (Chapters 4 and 5), these two about her work with the center convey the most nuance and self-reflexivity. This is likely a result of the long-term nature of Oh’s involvement with the center. This contrasts with the distanced and at times somewhat more superficial accounts of the university cover dance teams in San Diego, where her role was as an observer and visitor rather than a direct long-term participant.

Throughout the book, Oh makes a passionate and convincing case for the complexity of K-pop dance and its importance as an academic subject of study. Oh’s elaboration of the main aesthetic features of K-pop dance through the concept of what she calls “gestural point...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
K-Pop Dance:Chuyun Oh 著《在社交媒体上展示自我》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: K-Pop Dance:作者:Chuyun Oh Emily Wilcox K-POP DANCE: FANDOMING YOURSELF ON SOCIAL MEDIA.作者:Chuyun Oh。纽约:Routledge, 2023.x + 184 pp.软皮,42.36 美元。如今,任何从事亚洲研究、表演研究或媒体研究教学的人都知道,K-pop 在大学生中是一个非常受欢迎的话题,对该话题的研究需求量很大。Chuyun Oh 的这本书完美地满足了这一需求,尤其是对 K-pop 舞蹈的研究,而 K-pop 舞蹈是更广泛的 K-pop 类型中相对研究不足的一个组成部分。Oh 的这本书从多个角度研究了 K-pop 舞蹈--社交媒体舞蹈、现代舞蹈编排、跨文化表演和认同感的形成、社会参与和粉丝。K-pop 舞蹈》一书以非常通俗易懂的方式撰写,同时牢牢立足于一系列令人印象深刻的批判性表演和文化理论论述,为研究全球背景下的韩国流行舞蹈做出了令人振奋和极具原创性的贡献。该书分为两部分,与项目的两大贡献相对应。在 "第一部分:K-pop 舞蹈 "中,Oh 将 K-pop 舞蹈作为一种编舞流派进行研究,重点关注表演美学、培训以及专业艺术家在商业背景下创作 K-pop 舞蹈的历史和流传情况。在 "第二部分:K-pop 舞蹈爱好者 "中,吴晓波将 K-pop 舞蹈作为国际爱好者(包括难民、年轻人和大学生)的一种实践,重点关注身份传递、跨文化体验和社会流动的愿望等主题。本书的前半部分主要以亚洲的艺术家为中心,主要集中在 [第 456 页末] 韩国,但也有一个越南艺术家的案例研究。本书的后半部分主要关注来自美国或以美国为基地的爱好者。后半部分讨论的舞者背景相当多样,包括亚裔美国人、一名拉美裔美国人、一名在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥学习的南韩留学生、一名在日本留学的美国白人学生,以及纽约州尤蒂卡社区中心的一群来自泰国的难民青少年。尽管探讨的背景和主题看似各不相同,但本书由两个相关的主题统一起来:努力将 K-pop 舞蹈作为一种艺术和文化实践来认真对待,它有自己的美学目标和特定的媒体和产业背景;尊重粉丝的劳动,以及他们从不同的立场和特权参与 K-pop 时的各种交叉身份、欲望和经验的复杂性。在研究方法上,《Oh》结合了多地点民族志(包括现场参与观察、访谈和社交媒体民族志)、编排分析(主要是电视、TikTok 和 YouTube 上的表演视频),以及少量的自动民族志和表演民族志。最深入的人种学研究出现在第六章和后记中,这两章考察了欧氏在纽约州北部乌提卡中城社区中心与难民青少年的合作。正如 Oh 所解释的,这是她与 K-pop 封面舞者1 合作的第一站,始于 2016 年,当时她 "正在教授表演民族志课程,并为学生的实地考察寻找当地的社区中心"(第 143 页)。Oh 与该中心及其青少年的合作持续了多年,这表明她致力于将舞蹈作为一种社会参与和跨侨民社区的模式。与其他两个人种学章节(第 4 章和第 5 章)相比,这两个关于她与中心合作的章节传达了最多的细微差别和自我反思。这很可能是吴长期参与中心工作的结果。这与她对圣地亚哥大学封面舞队的描述形成了鲜明对比,在圣地亚哥大学封面舞队,她的角色是观察者和访问者,而不是直接的长期参与者。在整本书中,Oh 热情洋溢地阐述了 K-pop 舞蹈的复杂性及其作为学术研究对象的重要性,令人信服。Oh 通过她所称的 "姿态点 "概念阐述了 K-pop 舞蹈的主要美学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
From the Editor Speaking of the Spiritual: An Exploration of Knowledge and Pedagogy in Performing Arts in Malang, East Java Decolonizing and Producing Working-class Theatre in Pakistan: The Poetics and Politics of Sangat Theatre's Chog Kusumbhey Di (Picking Safflower) Ethos of Yajña Ritual: Mapping Girish Karnad's The Fire and the Rain K-Pop Dance: Fandoming Yourself on Social Media by Chuyun Oh (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1