Angelo Salatino, Tanay Aggarwal, Andrea Mannocci, Francesco Osborne, Enrico Motta
{"title":"A Survey on Knowledge Organization Systems of Research Fields: Resources and Challenges","authors":"Angelo Salatino, Tanay Aggarwal, Andrea Mannocci, Francesco Osborne, Enrico Motta","doi":"arxiv-2409.04432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs), such as term lists, thesauri,\ntaxonomies, and ontologies, play a fundamental role in categorising, managing,\nand retrieving information. In the academic domain, KOSs are often adopted for\nrepresenting research areas and their relationships, primarily aiming to\nclassify research articles, academic courses, patents, books, scientific\nvenues, domain experts, grants, software, experiment materials, and several\nother relevant products and agents. These structured representations of\nresearch areas, widely embraced by many academic fields, have proven effective\nin empowering AI-based systems to i) enhance retrievability of relevant\ndocuments, ii) enable advanced analytic solutions to quantify the impact of\nacademic research, and iii) analyse and forecast research dynamics. This paper\naims to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic\ndisciplines. We analysed and compared 45 KOSs according to five main\ndimensions: scope, structure, curation, usage, and links to other KOSs. Our\nresults reveal a very heterogeneous scenario in terms of scope, scale, quality,\nand usage, highlighting the need for more integrated solutions for representing\nresearch knowledge across academic fields. We conclude by discussing the main\nchallenges and the most promising future directions.","PeriodicalId":501281,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Information Retrieval","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs), such as term lists, thesauri,
taxonomies, and ontologies, play a fundamental role in categorising, managing,
and retrieving information. In the academic domain, KOSs are often adopted for
representing research areas and their relationships, primarily aiming to
classify research articles, academic courses, patents, books, scientific
venues, domain experts, grants, software, experiment materials, and several
other relevant products and agents. These structured representations of
research areas, widely embraced by many academic fields, have proven effective
in empowering AI-based systems to i) enhance retrievability of relevant
documents, ii) enable advanced analytic solutions to quantify the impact of
academic research, and iii) analyse and forecast research dynamics. This paper
aims to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic
disciplines. We analysed and compared 45 KOSs according to five main
dimensions: scope, structure, curation, usage, and links to other KOSs. Our
results reveal a very heterogeneous scenario in terms of scope, scale, quality,
and usage, highlighting the need for more integrated solutions for representing
research knowledge across academic fields. We conclude by discussing the main
challenges and the most promising future directions.