Judgements of identity claims vary for monoracial and biracial people

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Social Development Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1111/sode.12770
Elizabeth A. Quinn‐Jensen, Zoe Liberman
{"title":"Judgements of identity claims vary for monoracial and biracial people","authors":"Elizabeth A. Quinn‐Jensen, Zoe Liberman","doi":"10.1111/sode.12770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite increasing racial diversity in the United States, and the particular growth of multiracial populations, questions about how children perceive others’ (bi)racial identities remain poorly understood. In two preregistered studies, we asked White and racially minoritized American children (<jats:italic>N </jats:italic>= 157; 4–11‐years old) and White and multiracial adults (<jats:italic>N </jats:italic>= 226) how acceptable it was for monoracial people (Black or White; Study 1) and/or biracial people (Black–White; Studies 1 and 2) to claim either a monoracial or biracial identity. Consistent with past research with adults, children said that monoracial people should claim (only) the monoracial identity which matched their ancestry. Judgements about biracial identity were more variable. White and multiracial adults (Study 2) reported that biracial targets could claim a racial identity that matched either or both of their parents, with biracial claims being evaluated most positively. Exploratory analyses on children's judgements about biracial people's identity claims (Study 1) revealed different patterns of development for White children and children from minoritized backgrounds. Whereas White children became more likely with age to report that all identity claims were acceptable, children from racially minoritized groups became more likely with age to endorse biracial targets who claimed a biracial identity. These findings suggest that children's own racial background and age may have a larger impact on their perceptions of biracial people's identities, compared to their perceptions of monoracial people's identities.","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increasing racial diversity in the United States, and the particular growth of multiracial populations, questions about how children perceive others’ (bi)racial identities remain poorly understood. In two preregistered studies, we asked White and racially minoritized American children (N = 157; 4–11‐years old) and White and multiracial adults (N = 226) how acceptable it was for monoracial people (Black or White; Study 1) and/or biracial people (Black–White; Studies 1 and 2) to claim either a monoracial or biracial identity. Consistent with past research with adults, children said that monoracial people should claim (only) the monoracial identity which matched their ancestry. Judgements about biracial identity were more variable. White and multiracial adults (Study 2) reported that biracial targets could claim a racial identity that matched either or both of their parents, with biracial claims being evaluated most positively. Exploratory analyses on children's judgements about biracial people's identity claims (Study 1) revealed different patterns of development for White children and children from minoritized backgrounds. Whereas White children became more likely with age to report that all identity claims were acceptable, children from racially minoritized groups became more likely with age to endorse biracial targets who claimed a biracial identity. These findings suggest that children's own racial background and age may have a larger impact on their perceptions of biracial people's identities, compared to their perceptions of monoracial people's identities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单种族人和双种族人对身份主张的判断各不相同
尽管美国的种族多样性日益增加,多种族人口增长尤为明显,但人们对儿童如何看待他人的(双)种族身份仍然知之甚少。在两项预先登记的研究中,我们询问了白人和种族少数化的美国儿童(人数=157;4-11 岁)以及白人和多种族成人(人数=226)对单种族人(黑人或白人;研究 1)和/或双种族人(黑人-白人;研究 1 和 2)声称自己是单种族人或双种族人的接受程度。与过去对成人的研究一致,儿童认为单种族人应该(只)声称与其祖先相符的单种族身份。对双种族身份的判断则变化较大。白人和多种族成人(研究 2)表示,双种族目标可以声称自己的种族身份与其父母一方或双方相匹配,而双种族声称得到的评价最为积极。对儿童对双种族人身份主张的判断进行的探索性分析(研究 1)显示,白人儿童和来自少数民族背景的儿童有不同的发展模式。随着年龄的增长,白人儿童更有可能认为所有的身份主张都是可以接受的,而来自少数种族群体的儿童则更有可能认可那些声称自己是双种族身份的双种族目标。这些研究结果表明,与对单种族人身份的看法相比,儿童自身的种族背景和年龄可能会对他们对双种族人身份的看法产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Development
Social Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Social Development is a major international journal dealing with all aspects of children"s social development as seen from a psychological stance. Coverage includes a wide range of topics such as social cognition, peer relationships, social interaction, attachment formation, emotional development and children"s theories of mind. The main emphasis is placed on development in childhood, but lifespan, cross-species and cross-cultural perspectives enhancing our understanding of human development are also featured.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness in Indonesian adolescents: Associations with quantity and quality of friendship and status within and between peer groups Developmental differences in young children's implied use of cognitive resources in their self‐regulation strategies Judgements of identity claims vary for monoracial and biracial people Paternal activation parenting and growth in children's inhibitory control across early childhood Revisiting the seminal studies of attachment formation and reevaluating what it means to become attached
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1