The Genesis of the Crypto-economy: Application of the Institutional Theory

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Vikalpa Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1177/02560909241271742
Shashi Kant Srivastava, Verma Deepika Chandra, Srinivas Jangirala, Janardan Krishna Yadav
{"title":"The Genesis of the Crypto-economy: Application of the Institutional Theory","authors":"Shashi Kant Srivastava, Verma Deepika Chandra, Srinivas Jangirala, Janardan Krishna Yadav","doi":"10.1177/02560909241271742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article marks a transformative shift from traditional economic institutions to technologically driven ones. This study explores the institutionalization of the crypto-economy through the lens of institutional theory, examining the roles of regulatory, cognitive and normative pillars. Our findings indicate that these institutional pillars significantly influence the development of the crypto-economy. Specifically, the regulatory pillar mediates the relationship between the social pillar and the crypto-economy, highlighting the indirect but substantial impact of a country’s social framework on crypto-economic growth. We refer to the cognitive and normative pillars collectively as the social pillars.Technological advancements and the rise of blockchain technology have spurred the growth of innovative fintech organizations, creating profitable investment opportunities and addressing cross-industry challenges such as data security and transparency. Although existing literature primarily focuses on micro-level drivers, it is crucial to conduct macro-level analysis to understand the broader institutional factors that support the development of the crypto-economy, as micro-level insights alone do not adequately capture macro-level growth dynamics.As a result, our research employs path analysis using global institutional indicators, demonstrating that the cognitive and normative institutional pillars significantly influence the regulatory pillar, which in turn affects the crypto-economy. These findings suggest that countries with robust institutional frameworks are better positioned to adopt and benefit from crypto-economic technologies.Furthermore, understanding these macro-level factors can guide policymakers in less absorptive countries to stimulate regulatory institutions that support the crypto-economy. This institutional perspective is crucial for identifying future leaders and laggards in crypto-economic development and for understanding inter-country differences in crypto-economy adoption.In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of a supportive institutional framework for the development and adoption of the crypto-economy, emphasizing the interconnected growth of fintech technology and the need for empirical research to address broader developmental issues.","PeriodicalId":35878,"journal":{"name":"Vikalpa","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vikalpa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02560909241271742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article marks a transformative shift from traditional economic institutions to technologically driven ones. This study explores the institutionalization of the crypto-economy through the lens of institutional theory, examining the roles of regulatory, cognitive and normative pillars. Our findings indicate that these institutional pillars significantly influence the development of the crypto-economy. Specifically, the regulatory pillar mediates the relationship between the social pillar and the crypto-economy, highlighting the indirect but substantial impact of a country’s social framework on crypto-economic growth. We refer to the cognitive and normative pillars collectively as the social pillars.Technological advancements and the rise of blockchain technology have spurred the growth of innovative fintech organizations, creating profitable investment opportunities and addressing cross-industry challenges such as data security and transparency. Although existing literature primarily focuses on micro-level drivers, it is crucial to conduct macro-level analysis to understand the broader institutional factors that support the development of the crypto-economy, as micro-level insights alone do not adequately capture macro-level growth dynamics.As a result, our research employs path analysis using global institutional indicators, demonstrating that the cognitive and normative institutional pillars significantly influence the regulatory pillar, which in turn affects the crypto-economy. These findings suggest that countries with robust institutional frameworks are better positioned to adopt and benefit from crypto-economic technologies.Furthermore, understanding these macro-level factors can guide policymakers in less absorptive countries to stimulate regulatory institutions that support the crypto-economy. This institutional perspective is crucial for identifying future leaders and laggards in crypto-economic development and for understanding inter-country differences in crypto-economy adoption.In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of a supportive institutional framework for the development and adoption of the crypto-economy, emphasizing the interconnected growth of fintech technology and the need for empirical research to address broader developmental issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加密经济的起源:制度理论的应用
这篇文章标志着从传统经济体制到技术驱动型经济体制的转变。本研究从制度理论的角度探讨了加密经济的制度化问题,研究了监管、认知和规范支柱的作用。我们的研究结果表明,这些制度支柱对加密经济的发展有重大影响。具体来说,监管支柱是社会支柱与加密经济之间关系的中介,凸显了一个国家的社会框架对加密经济增长的间接但实质的影响。我们将认知支柱和规范支柱统称为社会支柱。技术进步和区块链技术的兴起刺激了创新型金融科技组织的发展,创造了有利可图的投资机会,并解决了数据安全和透明度等跨行业挑战。尽管现有文献主要关注微观层面的驱动因素,但进行宏观层面的分析以了解支持加密经济发展的更广泛的制度因素至关重要,因为仅有微观层面的见解并不能充分捕捉宏观层面的增长动态。因此,我们的研究采用了使用全球制度指标的路径分析,表明认知和规范性制度支柱对监管支柱有显著影响,而监管支柱又反过来影响加密经济。这些研究结果表明,拥有健全制度框架的国家更有能力采用加密经济技术并从中受益。此外,了解这些宏观层面的因素可以指导吸收能力较弱的国家的政策制定者激励支持加密经济的监管制度。总之,本研究强调了支持性制度框架对发展和采用加密经济的重要性,强调了金融科技技术的发展相互关联,并强调了开展实证研究以解决更广泛的发展问题的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vikalpa
Vikalpa Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Distinct Dimensions of Human Capital in Distressed Firms: Implications for Firms and Research The Genesis of the Crypto-economy: Application of the Institutional Theory The Need for Localized, Socio-economic Policy Measures for Controlling a Pandemic: An Empirical Study of COVID-19 in India Digital Darwinism: Surviving the New Age of Business Disruption Shades of Grey: An Ethical Dilemma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1