Prediction of poststroke independent walking using machine learning: a retrospective study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03849-z
Zhiqing Tang, Wenlong Su, Tianhao Liu, Haitao Lu, Ying Liu, Hui Li, Kaiyue Han, Md. Moneruzzaman, Junzi Long, Xingxing Liao, Xiaonian Zhang, Lei Shan, Hao Zhang
{"title":"Prediction of poststroke independent walking using machine learning: a retrospective study","authors":"Zhiqing Tang, Wenlong Su, Tianhao Liu, Haitao Lu, Ying Liu, Hui Li, Kaiyue Han, Md. Moneruzzaman, Junzi Long, Xingxing Liao, Xiaonian Zhang, Lei Shan, Hao Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03849-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately predicting the walking independence of stroke patients is important. Our objective was to determine and compare the performance of logistic regression (LR) and three machine learning models (eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest (RF)) in predicting walking independence at discharge in stroke patients, as well as to explore the variables that predict prognosis. 778 (80% for the training set and 20% for the test set) stroke patients admitted to China Rehabilitation Research Center between February 2020 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. The training set was used for training models. The test set was used to validate and compare the performance of the four models in terms of area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Among the three ML models, the AUC of the XGBoost model is significantly higher than that of the SVM and RF models (P < 0.001, P = 0.024, respectively). There was no significant difference in the AUCs between the XGBoost model and the LR model (0.891 vs. 0.880, P = 0.560). The XGBoost model demonstrated superior accuracy (87.82% vs. 86.54%), sensitivity (50.00% vs. 39.39%), PPV (73.68% vs. 73.33%), NPV (89.78% vs. 87.94%), and F1 score (59.57% vs. 51.16%), with only slightly lower specificity (96.09% vs. 96.88%). Together, the XGBoost model and the stepwise LR model identified age, FMA-LE at admission, FAC at admission, and lower limb spasticity as key factors influencing independent walking. Overall, the XGBoost model performed best in predicting independent walking after stroke. The XGBoost and LR models together confirm that age, admission FMA-LE, admission FAC, and lower extremity spasticity are the key factors influencing independent walking in stroke patients at hospital discharge. Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03849-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately predicting the walking independence of stroke patients is important. Our objective was to determine and compare the performance of logistic regression (LR) and three machine learning models (eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest (RF)) in predicting walking independence at discharge in stroke patients, as well as to explore the variables that predict prognosis. 778 (80% for the training set and 20% for the test set) stroke patients admitted to China Rehabilitation Research Center between February 2020 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. The training set was used for training models. The test set was used to validate and compare the performance of the four models in terms of area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Among the three ML models, the AUC of the XGBoost model is significantly higher than that of the SVM and RF models (P < 0.001, P = 0.024, respectively). There was no significant difference in the AUCs between the XGBoost model and the LR model (0.891 vs. 0.880, P = 0.560). The XGBoost model demonstrated superior accuracy (87.82% vs. 86.54%), sensitivity (50.00% vs. 39.39%), PPV (73.68% vs. 73.33%), NPV (89.78% vs. 87.94%), and F1 score (59.57% vs. 51.16%), with only slightly lower specificity (96.09% vs. 96.88%). Together, the XGBoost model and the stepwise LR model identified age, FMA-LE at admission, FAC at admission, and lower limb spasticity as key factors influencing independent walking. Overall, the XGBoost model performed best in predicting independent walking after stroke. The XGBoost and LR models together confirm that age, admission FMA-LE, admission FAC, and lower extremity spasticity are the key factors influencing independent walking in stroke patients at hospital discharge. Not applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习预测卒中后独立行走:一项回顾性研究
准确预测中风患者的行走独立性非常重要。我们的目的是确定并比较逻辑回归(LR)和三种机器学习模型(极梯度提升(XGBoost)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF))在预测脑卒中患者出院时步行独立性方面的性能,并探索预测预后的变量。回顾性纳入了中国康复研究中心在 2020 年 2 月至 2023 年 1 月期间收治的 778 例脑卒中患者(80% 用于训练集,20% 用于测试集)。训练集用于训练模型。测试集用于验证和比较四个模型在曲线下面积(AUC)、准确率、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和 F1 分数方面的性能。在三种 ML 模型中,XGBoost 模型的 AUC 明显高于 SVM 和 RF 模型(分别为 P < 0.001 和 P = 0.024)。XGBoost 模型和 LR 模型的 AUC 没有明显差异(0.891 vs. 0.880,P = 0.560)。XGBoost 模型的准确性(87.82% 对 86.54%)、灵敏度(50.00% 对 39.39%)、PPV(73.68% 对 73.33%)、NPV(89.78% 对 87.94%)和 F1 分数(59.57% 对 51.16%)均优于 LR 模型,只是特异性(96.09% 对 96.88%)略低。XGBoost 模型和逐步 LR 模型共同确定了年龄、入院时的 FMA-LE、入院时的 FAC 和下肢痉挛是影响独立行走的关键因素。总体而言,XGBoost 模型在预测卒中后独立行走方面表现最佳。XGBoost 模型和 LR 模型共同证实,年龄、入院时的 FMA-LE、入院时的 FAC 和下肢痉挛是影响卒中患者出院时独立行走的关键因素。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases: a cross-sectional retrospective study The relationship between HbA1c and the activities of daily living in complex chronic patients with and without intracerebral hemorrhage Brain abscesses: the first report of disseminated Nocardia beijingensis infection in an immunocompetent individual in China Energy metabolism-related GLUD1 contributes to favorable clinical outcomes of IDH-mutant glioma Pharmacological and physiological effects of cannabidiol: a dose escalation, placebo washout study protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1