{"title":"Review and Evaluate the Bioinformatics Analysis Strategies of ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag Data.","authors":"Siyuan Cheng,Benpeng Miao,Tiandao Li,Guoyan Zhao,Bo Zhang","doi":"10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficient and reliable profiling methods are essential to study epigenetics. Tn5, one of the first identified prokaryotic transposases with high DNA-binding and tagmentation efficiency, is widely adopted in different genomic and epigenomic protocols for high-throughputly exploring the genome and epigenome. Based on Tn5, the Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq) and the Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) were developed to measure chromatin accessibility and detect DNA-protein interactions. These methodologies can be applied to large amounts of biological samples with low-input levels, such as rare tissues, embryos, and sorted single cells. However, fast and proper processing of these epigenomic data has become a bottleneck because massive data production continues to increase quickly. Furthermore, inappropriate data analysis can generate biased or misleading conclusions. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the performance of Tn5-based ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag data processing bioinformatics tools, many of which were developed mostly for analyzing chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) data. Here, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking analysis to evaluate the performance of eight popular software for processing ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag data. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, and peak width distribution for both narrow-type and broad-type peak calling. We also tested the influence of the availability of control IgG input in CUT&Tag data analysis. Finally, we evaluated the differential analysis strategies commonly used for analyzing the CUT&Tag data. Our study provided comprehensive guidance for selecting bioinformatics tools and recommended analysis strategies, which were implemented into Docker/Singularity images for streamlined data analysis.","PeriodicalId":12528,"journal":{"name":"Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Efficient and reliable profiling methods are essential to study epigenetics. Tn5, one of the first identified prokaryotic transposases with high DNA-binding and tagmentation efficiency, is widely adopted in different genomic and epigenomic protocols for high-throughputly exploring the genome and epigenome. Based on Tn5, the Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq) and the Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) were developed to measure chromatin accessibility and detect DNA-protein interactions. These methodologies can be applied to large amounts of biological samples with low-input levels, such as rare tissues, embryos, and sorted single cells. However, fast and proper processing of these epigenomic data has become a bottleneck because massive data production continues to increase quickly. Furthermore, inappropriate data analysis can generate biased or misleading conclusions. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the performance of Tn5-based ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag data processing bioinformatics tools, many of which were developed mostly for analyzing chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) data. Here, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking analysis to evaluate the performance of eight popular software for processing ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag data. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, and peak width distribution for both narrow-type and broad-type peak calling. We also tested the influence of the availability of control IgG input in CUT&Tag data analysis. Finally, we evaluated the differential analysis strategies commonly used for analyzing the CUT&Tag data. Our study provided comprehensive guidance for selecting bioinformatics tools and recommended analysis strategies, which were implemented into Docker/Singularity images for streamlined data analysis.
期刊介绍:
Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics (GPB) is the official journal of the Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences / China National Center for Bioinformation and Genetics Society of China. It aims to disseminate new developments in the field of omics and bioinformatics, publish high-quality discoveries quickly, and promote open access and online publication. GPB welcomes submissions in all areas of life science, biology, and biomedicine, with a focus on large data acquisition, analysis, and curation. Manuscripts covering omics and related bioinformatics topics are particularly encouraged. GPB is indexed/abstracted by PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Scopus, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts, CSCD, among others.