Field Evaluation of Sugarcane Genotypes for Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in China

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Sugar Tech Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1007/s12355-024-01476-z
Yisha Li, Jingxia Du, Meilin Li, Wei Yao, Muqing Zhang
{"title":"Field Evaluation of Sugarcane Genotypes for Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in China","authors":"Yisha Li, Jingxia Du, Meilin Li, Wei Yao, Muqing Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s12355-024-01476-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leaf scald is one of the major bacterial diseases causing severe losses to the sugarcane industry. Utilizing disease-resistant genotypes has proved to be the safest, most economical, and effective method to control it. Therefore, we evaluated leaf scald disease (LSD) on 166 sugarcane genotypes in a field trial over three years (2019–2021). We found that the disease incidence and severity varied among genotypes, and the percentage of diseased genotypes differed significantly across crop seasons. ANOVA analysis revealed that Genotype, Year, and Genotype-by-Year interaction significantly affected LSD occurrence. However, the broad-sense heritability (<i>H</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><sup>2</sup>) for disease incidence (IC) and severity (DI) over three years was 0.72 and 0.68, respectively, suggesting that genetic factors play an essential role. To better classify the level of disease resistance, we performed cluster analysis using three years of disease incidence and severity; the accuracy of the cluster analysis was verified by discriminant analysis. Of the 166 sugarcane genotypes, 35 (21.08%) were highly resistant, 67 (40.36%) resistant, 24 (14.46%) moderately susceptible, 24 (14.46%) susceptible, and 16 (9.64%) highly susceptible. The total probability of discriminant analysis was 90.36%, indicating that the classification results were relatively accurate. The outcomes of this study provide a scientific basis for breeding and selecting resistant genotypes for commercial cultivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-024-01476-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaf scald is one of the major bacterial diseases causing severe losses to the sugarcane industry. Utilizing disease-resistant genotypes has proved to be the safest, most economical, and effective method to control it. Therefore, we evaluated leaf scald disease (LSD) on 166 sugarcane genotypes in a field trial over three years (2019–2021). We found that the disease incidence and severity varied among genotypes, and the percentage of diseased genotypes differed significantly across crop seasons. ANOVA analysis revealed that Genotype, Year, and Genotype-by-Year interaction significantly affected LSD occurrence. However, the broad-sense heritability (HB2) for disease incidence (IC) and severity (DI) over three years was 0.72 and 0.68, respectively, suggesting that genetic factors play an essential role. To better classify the level of disease resistance, we performed cluster analysis using three years of disease incidence and severity; the accuracy of the cluster analysis was verified by discriminant analysis. Of the 166 sugarcane genotypes, 35 (21.08%) were highly resistant, 67 (40.36%) resistant, 24 (14.46%) moderately susceptible, 24 (14.46%) susceptible, and 16 (9.64%) highly susceptible. The total probability of discriminant analysis was 90.36%, indicating that the classification results were relatively accurate. The outcomes of this study provide a scientific basis for breeding and selecting resistant genotypes for commercial cultivation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国甘蔗基因型对叶片灼伤病抗性的田间评估
叶烫病是给甘蔗产业造成严重损失的主要细菌性病害之一。事实证明,利用抗病基因型是最安全、最经济、最有效的防治方法。因此,我们在三年(2019-2021 年)的田间试验中对 166 种甘蔗基因型的叶烫病(LSD)进行了评估。我们发现,不同基因型的病害发生率和严重程度各不相同,不同作物季节患病基因型的比例也有显著差异。方差分析显示,基因型、年份和基因型与年份的交互作用对 LSD 的发生有显著影响。然而,三年中病害发生率(IC)和严重程度(DI)的广义遗传率(HB2)分别为 0.72 和 0.68,表明遗传因素起着至关重要的作用。为了更好地划分抗病水平,我们利用三年的发病率和严重程度进行了聚类分析;聚类分析的准确性通过判别分析得到了验证。在 166 个甘蔗基因型中,35 个(21.08%)高度抗病,67 个(40.36%)抗病,24 个(14.46%)中度感病,24 个(14.46%)感病,16 个(9.64%)高度感病。判别分析的总概率为 90.36%,表明分类结果相对准确。研究结果为商业化种植中抗性基因型的培育和选育提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
期刊最新文献
Current Status and Prospects of the Global Sugar Beet Industry Sugar Beet Special Issue: Biotechnology and Breeding Techniques for Stress-Resistant Sugar Beet Genome-Wide Identification of the BvHSFs Gene Family and Their Expression in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Under Salt Stress Effects of Different Irrigation and Fertilization Levels on the Yield and Quality of Wet Sugar Beet Pulp Used as Animal Feed Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhance Tolerance to Drought Stress by Altering the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Sugar Beet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1