‘Journalism in another form’: How exile experiences from Burundi renegotiate key elements of journalism

Louisa Esther, Richard H Thomas
{"title":"‘Journalism in another form’: How exile experiences from Burundi renegotiate key elements of journalism","authors":"Louisa Esther, Richard H Thomas","doi":"10.1177/17506352241268814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the renewed outbreak of the ongoing crisis in Burundi in May 2015, triggering a media crackdown, over one-third of the country’s reporters have gone into exile. They therefore joined an increasing number of journalists worldwide who are forced into exile. Between 2015 and 2021, many of the exiled Burundian journalists continued reporting for newly founded exile media in neighbouring Rwanda. Before their forced closure in 2021, these exile media had established themselves as successful outlets providing the only independent information from an otherwise blacked-out country. Based on semi-structured interviews with 10 exiled Burundian journalists conducted in Rwanda in 2020, this article exemplifies how the condition of exile impacts journalistic practice and norms, and renegotiates ideas of media professionalism. It is shown how Burundian exiled journalists display a strong personal conscience as journalists highlighting the voice of the voiceless and attempting to separate activism from their journalism. At the same time, the findings identify the main struggles of Burundian exiled journalists in maintaining operational objectivity, which depends on funding, providing balanced reporting without access to official sources and conducting verification of information in the unattainable field. These challenges are in line with the findings of several other case studies with exiled journalists from different regions. Therefore, this article complements the rapidly growing body of literature on exile journalism with a Global South perspective, which to date is not well represented on the map of exile journalism that mostly features cases of exile in the Global North. Furthermore, this article shows that situating exile experiences within existing theories and frameworks of journalism presents limits as exile journalism, as in the Burundian case, is journalism ‘in another form’ with new practices and renegotiated standards of professionalism.","PeriodicalId":501537,"journal":{"name":"Media, War & Conflict","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, War & Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352241268814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the renewed outbreak of the ongoing crisis in Burundi in May 2015, triggering a media crackdown, over one-third of the country’s reporters have gone into exile. They therefore joined an increasing number of journalists worldwide who are forced into exile. Between 2015 and 2021, many of the exiled Burundian journalists continued reporting for newly founded exile media in neighbouring Rwanda. Before their forced closure in 2021, these exile media had established themselves as successful outlets providing the only independent information from an otherwise blacked-out country. Based on semi-structured interviews with 10 exiled Burundian journalists conducted in Rwanda in 2020, this article exemplifies how the condition of exile impacts journalistic practice and norms, and renegotiates ideas of media professionalism. It is shown how Burundian exiled journalists display a strong personal conscience as journalists highlighting the voice of the voiceless and attempting to separate activism from their journalism. At the same time, the findings identify the main struggles of Burundian exiled journalists in maintaining operational objectivity, which depends on funding, providing balanced reporting without access to official sources and conducting verification of information in the unattainable field. These challenges are in line with the findings of several other case studies with exiled journalists from different regions. Therefore, this article complements the rapidly growing body of literature on exile journalism with a Global South perspective, which to date is not well represented on the map of exile journalism that mostly features cases of exile in the Global North. Furthermore, this article shows that situating exile experiences within existing theories and frameworks of journalism presents limits as exile journalism, as in the Burundian case, is journalism ‘in another form’ with new practices and renegotiated standards of professionalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
另一种形式的新闻报道":布隆迪的流亡经历如何重新谈判新闻业的关键要素
自 2015 年 5 月布隆迪再次爆发持续危机并引发媒体镇压以来,该国超过三分之一的记者流亡国外。因此,他们加入了全世界越来越多被迫流亡的记者行列。2015 年至 2021 年间,许多流亡的布隆迪记者继续为邻国卢旺达新成立的流亡媒体进行报道。在 2021 年被迫关闭之前,这些流亡媒体已成为成功的媒体,为这个被封锁的国家提供唯一的独立信息。本文以 2020 年在卢旺达对 10 名流亡的布隆迪记者进行的半结构式采访为基础,举例说明了流亡条件如何影响新闻实践和规范,以及如何重新谈判媒体专业主义的理念。文章展示了布隆迪流亡记者如何表现出强烈的个人良知,作为记者,他们强调无声者的声音,并试图将激进主义与他们的新闻工作区分开来。与此同时,研究结果还指出了布隆迪流亡记者在保持业务客观性方面所面临的主要困 难,这取决于资金、在无法获得官方消息来源的情况下提供平衡的报道以及在无法实现的 领域对信息进行核实。这些挑战与其他几项针对不同地区流亡记者的案例研究结果是一致的。因此,本文以全球南部的视角对迅速增长的流亡新闻文献进行了补充,迄今为止,全球南部在流亡新闻地图上并没有得到很好的体现。此外,本文还表明,将流亡经历置于现有的新闻理论和框架中会受到限制,因为流亡新闻(如布隆迪的案例)是 "另一种形式 "的新闻,具有新的实践和重新谈判的专业标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radio Okapi online newspapers: Between media framing, conflict and peacebuilding Personalized, war and peace journalism on Twitter: The Russo-Ukrainian War through the lens of political journalists ‘Journalism in another form’: How exile experiences from Burundi renegotiate key elements of journalism Framing the 2013 Westgate Mall attack: A comparative study of Kenyan and US media perspectives Performing terror, communicating fear: Analysing terrorism as performance of violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1