Soybean Glycinin’s Antibacterial Properties Provide a Feasible Natural Alternative for Improving the Overall Quality and Shelf-Life of Beef Steaks and Combating Foodborne Pathogens

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Bioprocess Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s11947-024-03557-z
Mai Elsheikh, Ali Osman, Shimaa Edris, Wesam Dawam, Mahmoud Sitohy, Islam Sabeq
{"title":"Soybean Glycinin’s Antibacterial Properties Provide a Feasible Natural Alternative for Improving the Overall Quality and Shelf-Life of Beef Steaks and Combating Foodborne Pathogens","authors":"Mai Elsheikh, Ali Osman, Shimaa Edris, Wesam Dawam, Mahmoud Sitohy, Islam Sabeq","doi":"10.1007/s11947-024-03557-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ensuring the safety and longevity of food products is a major priority in the meat industry. This paper focused on assessing the soybean-glycinin (SBG) impact on the quality and shelf-life of beef <i>Musculus longissimus thoracis</i> et <i>lumborum</i> (<i>LTL</i>) steaks and their potential in-vivo adverse consequences on foodborne pathogens and quantitative minimum biocidal values. Over 15 chilling-days at 4 °C, fresh <i>LTL</i>-steaks were fortified with either 1 mg/g of SBG (SBG1) or 0.5 mg/g (SBG0.5) and compared to control for physicochemical, oxidative, and microbiological attributes. Antibiotic-susceptible pathogens, <i>Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica</i>, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> were suppressed by 0.98 mg/mL of SBG, whereas antibiotic-resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> required higher biocidal dosages of 50 and 6.25 mg/mL, respectively. SBG-fortification kept <i>LTL</i>-steaks’ pH below borderline until day 12, increased water-holding capacity, reduced cooking loss at the storage end, and significantly improved tenderness (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). <i>LTL</i>-steaks’ lightness, redness, and chroma were statistically unaffected by SBG1.0-fortification compared to the control; however, there were notable growing-patterns during the last two storage-periods (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Except the sixth- and ninth-day storage-periods, SBG1.0-fortification increased the <i>LTL</i>-steaks yellowness and <i>hue</i> compared to the control, indicating brighter, less red meat (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). SBG-fortification had a dose-dependent antioxidant and bactericidal impact on both native microflora and inoculated pathogens, <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> and <i>Salmonella</i>. Conclusively, SBG-fortification activities to improve <i>LTL</i>-steaks oxidative stability and shelf-life beyond 15 days and to inhibit inoculated-pathogens growth by one log CFU/g above or below the inoculation dose, validating SBG as a promising feasible meat preservation strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":562,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-024-03557-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring the safety and longevity of food products is a major priority in the meat industry. This paper focused on assessing the soybean-glycinin (SBG) impact on the quality and shelf-life of beef Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) steaks and their potential in-vivo adverse consequences on foodborne pathogens and quantitative minimum biocidal values. Over 15 chilling-days at 4 °C, fresh LTL-steaks were fortified with either 1 mg/g of SBG (SBG1) or 0.5 mg/g (SBG0.5) and compared to control for physicochemical, oxidative, and microbiological attributes. Antibiotic-susceptible pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica, and Escherichia coli were suppressed by 0.98 mg/mL of SBG, whereas antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli required higher biocidal dosages of 50 and 6.25 mg/mL, respectively. SBG-fortification kept LTL-steaks’ pH below borderline until day 12, increased water-holding capacity, reduced cooking loss at the storage end, and significantly improved tenderness (p < 0.05). LTL-steaks’ lightness, redness, and chroma were statistically unaffected by SBG1.0-fortification compared to the control; however, there were notable growing-patterns during the last two storage-periods (p < 0.05). Except the sixth- and ninth-day storage-periods, SBG1.0-fortification increased the LTL-steaks yellowness and hue compared to the control, indicating brighter, less red meat (p < 0.05). SBG-fortification had a dose-dependent antioxidant and bactericidal impact on both native microflora and inoculated pathogens, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella. Conclusively, SBG-fortification activities to improve LTL-steaks oxidative stability and shelf-life beyond 15 days and to inhibit inoculated-pathogens growth by one log CFU/g above or below the inoculation dose, validating SBG as a promising feasible meat preservation strategy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大豆甘氨素的抗菌特性为提高牛肉排的整体质量和保质期以及防治食源性病原体提供了一种可行的天然替代品
确保食品的安全性和保质期是肉类行业的重中之重。本文重点评估了大豆甘氨素(SBG)对牛肉长胸肌和腰肌(LTL)牛排的质量和货架期的影响,以及其对食源性病原体的潜在体内不良后果和定量最低杀菌值。在 4 °C 条件下冷藏 15 天后,新鲜的胸腰肌肉排被添加 1 mg/g 的 SBG(SBG1)或 0.5 mg/g 的 SBG(SBG0.5),并与对照组进行理化、氧化和微生物属性比较。0.98 毫克/毫升的 SBG 可抑制抗生素敏感病原体金黄色葡萄球菌、肠炎沙门氏菌和大肠埃希氏菌,而抗生素耐药的肠炎沙门氏菌和大肠埃希氏菌则需要更高的杀菌剂量,分别为 50 毫克/毫升和 6.25 毫克/毫升。添加 SBG 后,LTL-staks 的 pH 值在第 12 天前一直保持在临界值以下,持水量增加,贮藏末期的蒸煮损失减少,嫩度显著提高(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,SBG1.0强化剂对LTL-staks的亮度、红度和色度没有统计学影响;不过,在最后两个贮藏期,LTL-staks出现了明显的生长模式(p <0.05)。除第六天和第九天贮藏期外,与对照组相比,SBG1.0-强化剂增加了LTL-steaks的黄度和色调,表明肉色更亮、更不红(p <0.05)。SBG强化剂对本地微生物和接种的病原体(单核细胞增生李斯特菌和沙门氏菌)具有剂量依赖性的抗氧化和杀菌作用。总之,SBG强化剂可提高LTL腌制品的氧化稳定性,使其货架期延长至15天以上,并可抑制接种病原体的生长,使其在接种剂量上下增加一个对数的CFU/g,从而验证了SBG是一种可行的肉类保存策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Bioprocess Technology
Food and Bioprocess Technology 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
19.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Food and Bioprocess Technology provides an effective and timely platform for cutting-edge high quality original papers in the engineering and science of all types of food processing technologies, from the original food supply source to the consumer’s dinner table. It aims to be a leading international journal for the multidisciplinary agri-food research community. The journal focuses especially on experimental or theoretical research findings that have the potential for helping the agri-food industry to improve process efficiency, enhance product quality and, extend shelf-life of fresh and processed agri-food products. The editors present critical reviews on new perspectives to established processes, innovative and emerging technologies, and trends and future research in food and bioproducts processing. The journal also publishes short communications for rapidly disseminating preliminary results, letters to the Editor on recent developments and controversy, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Production and Preliminary Characterization of Microbial Cellulose Generated in Fermented Moringa and Coated with Flaxseed Mucilage Pomegranate Peel Flour as a Co-encapsulant Improves the Survival of Lactic Acid Bacteria to Thermal Treatment and Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions A Novel Approach for Solubility and Bioavailability Enhancement of Canthaxanthin Obtained from Dietzia natronolimnaea HS-1 by Canthaxanthin-V-Amylose Complex Storage Stability and Anthocyanin Degradation Kinetics of Alginate/Carboxymethyl Cellulose–based Emulsion Fortified with Red Onion Peel Extracts and its Application in the Preservation of Fresh Strawberries Investigating the Impact of Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Oil-in-Water Nanoemulsion on Cell Membrane Degradation and Inhibition of C. gloeosporioides in Postharvest Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1