Topical Influence: Reiterative Code-Switching in the Kufr Qassem Deaf Community

IF 0.5 Q3 LINGUISTICS Sign Language Studies Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1353/sls.2024.a936333
Rose Stamp, Duaa Omar-Hajdawood, Rama Novogrodsky
{"title":"Topical Influence: Reiterative Code-Switching in the Kufr Qassem Deaf Community","authors":"Rose Stamp, Duaa Omar-Hajdawood, Rama Novogrodsky","doi":"10.1353/sls.2024.a936333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Reiterative code-switching, when one lexical item from one language is produced immediately after a semantically equivalent lexical item in another language, is a frequent phenomenon in studies of language contact. Several spoken language studies suggest that reiteration functions as a form of accommodation, amplification (emphasis), reinforcement, or clarification; however, its function in sign language seems less clear. In this study, we investigate reiterative code-switching produced in semispontaneous conversations while manipulating two important factors: interlocutor and topic. Ten bilinguals of Kufr Qassem Sign Language (KQSL), a local sign language used in central Israel, and Israeli Sign Language (ISL), the national sign language of Israel, participated in a semispontaneous conversation task in three interlocutor conditions, with: (1) another bilingual, (2) a KQSL-dominant signer, and (3) an ISL-dominant signer. They were given \"local\" (e.g., traditions in Kufr Qassem) and \"global\" (e.g., travel) topics to discuss. A total of 673 code-switches were found in the data, of which sixty-seven were reiterative. Interlocutor was found to be a significant predictor of the presence of reiterative code-switching, with more reiterations observed when participants interacted with a KQSL-dominant signer or bilingual than with an ISL-dominant signer. These results suggest that reiteration serves an accommodative function. Yet, this does not explain reiterations found in the bilingual-bilingual condition. We show that, in these cases, reiteration plays other roles beyond accommodation, including amplification.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":21753,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2024.a936333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Reiterative code-switching, when one lexical item from one language is produced immediately after a semantically equivalent lexical item in another language, is a frequent phenomenon in studies of language contact. Several spoken language studies suggest that reiteration functions as a form of accommodation, amplification (emphasis), reinforcement, or clarification; however, its function in sign language seems less clear. In this study, we investigate reiterative code-switching produced in semispontaneous conversations while manipulating two important factors: interlocutor and topic. Ten bilinguals of Kufr Qassem Sign Language (KQSL), a local sign language used in central Israel, and Israeli Sign Language (ISL), the national sign language of Israel, participated in a semispontaneous conversation task in three interlocutor conditions, with: (1) another bilingual, (2) a KQSL-dominant signer, and (3) an ISL-dominant signer. They were given "local" (e.g., traditions in Kufr Qassem) and "global" (e.g., travel) topics to discuss. A total of 673 code-switches were found in the data, of which sixty-seven were reiterative. Interlocutor was found to be a significant predictor of the presence of reiterative code-switching, with more reiterations observed when participants interacted with a KQSL-dominant signer or bilingual than with an ISL-dominant signer. These results suggest that reiteration serves an accommodative function. Yet, this does not explain reiterations found in the bilingual-bilingual condition. We show that, in these cases, reiteration plays other roles beyond accommodation, including amplification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主题影响:Kufr Qassem聋人社区中的重读代码转换
摘要:在语言接触的研究中,重读换码(reiterative code-switching)是一种常见现象,即一种语言中的一个词条紧接着另一种语言中语义等同的词条出现。一些口语研究表明,重复作为一种调适、放大(强调)、强化或澄清的形式发挥作用;然而,它在手语中的作用似乎不太明确。在本研究中,我们调查了在半即时会话中产生的重读代码转换,同时操纵了两个重要因素:对话者和话题。十名 Kufr Qassem 手语(KQSL,以色列中部使用的一种当地手语)和以色列手语(ISL,以色列国家手语)的双语者在三种对话者条件下参加了半即时会话任务,对话者分别是:(1)另一名双语者;(2)一名双语者;(3)一名双语者:(1) 另一名双语者,(2) 一名以 KQSL 手语为主的手语者,(3) 一名以 ISL 手语为主的手语者。对话者给他们提供了 "本地"(如库夫尔卡萨姆的传统)和 "全球"(如旅游)话题供他们讨论。数据中共发现 673 个代码转换,其中 67 个是重复性的。研究发现,对话者是出现重复性代码转换的重要预测因素,当参与者与 KQSL 主导的手语者或双语者互动时,比与 ISL 主导的手语者互动时观察到更多的重复性代码转换。这些结果表明,重复具有适应功能。然而,这并不能解释双语-双语条件下的重复。我们的研究表明,在这些情况下,重复除了起调适作用外,还起其他作用,包括放大作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sign Language Studies
Sign Language Studies LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Sign Language Studies publishes a wide range of original scholarly articles and essays relevant to signed languages and signing communities. The journal provides a forum for the dissemination of important ideas and opinions concerning these languages and the communities who use them. Topics of interest include linguistics, anthropology, semiotics, Deaf culture, and Deaf history and literature.
期刊最新文献
Topical Influence: Reiterative Code-Switching in the Kufr Qassem Deaf Community A Reappraisal of the Ties Between Martha's Vineyard Sign Language and Other Sign Languages Experiences of Deaf Students in Chile: A Contribution to Social Justice Exploring Signed Literacy in Elementary Deaf Students Through Evidence-Based Instructional Methods Antonymy in Ethiopian Sign Language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1