{"title":"Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education","authors":"Samar Aad, Mariann Hardey","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2024-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has seen exponential growth in recent years due to its capability to generate original content through natural language processing and comprehensive language models. This paper aims to investigate the transformative impact of GAI on higher education, focusing on the evolving roles of faculty in the classroom.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using a phenomenological perspective and a process approach, the study involved 25 semi-structured interviews with academicians in higher education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings reveal that GAI currently creates biased and commercially driven learning environments, challenging traditional pedagogical models. Despite its potential for enhancing education, the autonomous nature of GAI often prioritizes commercial interests over pedagogical goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study is limited to faculty perspectives, suggesting future research should include student viewpoints and diverse educational contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The study highlights the need for higher education institutions to develop comprehensive policies, provide training for faculty and students and design new courses that leverage GAI for personalized learning experiences and enhanced faculty research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper contributes to the emerging literature on GAI’s impact on education, highlighting its dual nature as both a transformative tool and a potential threat to traditional educational roles and outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46734,"journal":{"name":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-02-2024-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has seen exponential growth in recent years due to its capability to generate original content through natural language processing and comprehensive language models. This paper aims to investigate the transformative impact of GAI on higher education, focusing on the evolving roles of faculty in the classroom.
Design/methodology/approach
Using a phenomenological perspective and a process approach, the study involved 25 semi-structured interviews with academicians in higher education.
Findings
The findings reveal that GAI currently creates biased and commercially driven learning environments, challenging traditional pedagogical models. Despite its potential for enhancing education, the autonomous nature of GAI often prioritizes commercial interests over pedagogical goals.
Research limitations/implications
The study is limited to faculty perspectives, suggesting future research should include student viewpoints and diverse educational contexts.
Practical implications
The study highlights the need for higher education institutions to develop comprehensive policies, provide training for faculty and students and design new courses that leverage GAI for personalized learning experiences and enhanced faculty research.
Originality/value
This paper contributes to the emerging literature on GAI’s impact on education, highlighting its dual nature as both a transformative tool and a potential threat to traditional educational roles and outcomes.
目的人工智能(GAI)通过自然语言处理和综合语言模型生成原创内容的能力,近年来呈指数级增长。本文旨在研究 GAI 对高等教育的变革性影响,重点关注教师在课堂中不断演变的角色。研究结果研究结果表明,GAI 目前创造了有偏见和商业驱动的学习环境,对传统教学模式提出了挑战。尽管 GAI 具有促进教育的潜力,但其自主性往往将商业利益置于教学目标之上。研究局限/启示该研究仅限于教师的观点,建议未来的研究应包括学生观点和不同的教育背景。实践意义该研究强调,高等教育机构需要制定全面的政策,为教师和学生提供培训,并设计新课程,利用 GAI 实现个性化学习体验并加强教师研究。
期刊介绍:
QAE publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, primary, secondary, higher and professional education. Periodically, QAE also publishes systematic reviews, research syntheses and assessment policy articles on topics of current significance. As an international journal, QAE seeks submissions on topics that have global relevance. Article submissions could pertain to the following areas integral to QAE''s mission: -organizational or program development, change and improvement -educational testing or assessment programs -evaluation of educational innovations, programs and projects -school efficiency assessments -standards, reforms, accountability, accreditation, and audits in education -tools, criteria and methods for examining or assuring quality