Putting patients first: when home-based care staff prioritise loyalty to patients above the system and themselves. An ethnographic study

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS BMC Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01094-0
Cecilie Knagenhjelm Hertzberg, Morten Magelssen, Anne Kari Tolo Heggestad
{"title":"Putting patients first: when home-based care staff prioritise loyalty to patients above the system and themselves. An ethnographic study","authors":"Cecilie Knagenhjelm Hertzberg, Morten Magelssen, Anne Kari Tolo Heggestad","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01094-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing number of older people worldwide poses challenges for health policy, particularly in the Global North, where policymakers increasingly expect seniors to live and receive care at home. However, healthcare professionals, particularly in home-based care, face dilemmas between adhering to care ideals and meeting external demands. Although they strive to uphold ethical care standards, they must deal with patients’ needs, cooperation with colleagues and management guidelines. Home-based care is an essential part of healthcare services in Norway, but staff struggle with high patient numbers and time management. This article focuses on how staff deal with ethical challenges related to contextual and organisational constraints. An ethnographic fieldwork in three municipalities in South-East Norway. The first author conducted three to four months of participant observation in each municipality. In addition, she conducted in-depth interviews with key informants in two municipalities and a focus group interview with seven home-based care workers in one municipality. The data was analysed by using a reflexive thematic analysis. Staff in home-based care are frequently more loyal to the patient than to the system and to their own needs. To provide good care, all informants disregarded the patient’s formal decision, i.e. they provided more care than the formalised decision stipulated. To prioritise beneficence to patients, informants also disregarded some of the rules applicable in home-based care. In addition, staff accepted risks to their own safety and health to provide care in the patient’s home. The loyalty of home-based care staff to their patients can go beyond their loyalty to the rules of the system and even their own safety. This commitment might be attributed to a sense of doing meaningful work, to providing relationship-based and individualised care, and to strong moral courage. However, the staff’s emphasis on flexibility and individualised care also brings challenges related to unclear boundaries related to patient care.","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01094-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing number of older people worldwide poses challenges for health policy, particularly in the Global North, where policymakers increasingly expect seniors to live and receive care at home. However, healthcare professionals, particularly in home-based care, face dilemmas between adhering to care ideals and meeting external demands. Although they strive to uphold ethical care standards, they must deal with patients’ needs, cooperation with colleagues and management guidelines. Home-based care is an essential part of healthcare services in Norway, but staff struggle with high patient numbers and time management. This article focuses on how staff deal with ethical challenges related to contextual and organisational constraints. An ethnographic fieldwork in three municipalities in South-East Norway. The first author conducted three to four months of participant observation in each municipality. In addition, she conducted in-depth interviews with key informants in two municipalities and a focus group interview with seven home-based care workers in one municipality. The data was analysed by using a reflexive thematic analysis. Staff in home-based care are frequently more loyal to the patient than to the system and to their own needs. To provide good care, all informants disregarded the patient’s formal decision, i.e. they provided more care than the formalised decision stipulated. To prioritise beneficence to patients, informants also disregarded some of the rules applicable in home-based care. In addition, staff accepted risks to their own safety and health to provide care in the patient’s home. The loyalty of home-based care staff to their patients can go beyond their loyalty to the rules of the system and even their own safety. This commitment might be attributed to a sense of doing meaningful work, to providing relationship-based and individualised care, and to strong moral courage. However, the staff’s emphasis on flexibility and individualised care also brings challenges related to unclear boundaries related to patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
把病人放在第一位:当家庭护理人员把对病人的忠诚放在系统和自身之上时。人种学研究
全球老年人数量的不断增长给医疗卫生政策带来了挑战,尤其是在全球北方地区,政策制定者越来越期望老年人在家中生活并接受护理。然而,医疗保健专业人员,尤其是居家护理专业人员,面临着坚持护理理想与满足外部需求之间的两难选择。尽管他们努力坚持道德护理标准,但他们必须处理病人的需求、与同事的合作以及管理准则等问题。在挪威,家庭护理是医疗保健服务的重要组成部分,但工作人员却要面对病人数量多和时间管理的难题。本文重点探讨了工作人员如何应对与环境和组织限制相关的道德挑战。在挪威东南部的三个城市进行了人种学实地调查。第一作者在每个城市进行了三至四个月的参与观察。此外,她还对两个市镇的主要信息提供者进行了深入访谈,并对一个市镇的七名家庭护理人员进行了焦点小组访谈。作者采用反思性专题分析法对数据进行了分析。家庭护理人员往往更忠于病人,而不是系统和自身需求。为了提供良好的护理,所有信息提供者都无视病人的正式决定,即他们提供的护理比正式决定规定的更多。为了优先考虑病人的利益,提供信息者还无视一些适用于家庭护理的规则。此外,为了在病人家中提供护理服务,工作人员甘愿承担自身安全和健康的风险。居家护理人员对病人的忠诚可能超越了他们对制度规则甚至自身安全的忠诚。这种忠诚可以归因于一种从事有意义工作的感觉,归因于提供以关系为基础的个性化护理,归因于强大的道德勇气。然而,医护人员对灵活性和个性化护理的强调也带来了与病人护理界限不清有关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
期刊最新文献
From ontological to relational: A scoping review of conceptions of dignity invoked in deliberations on medically assisted death Putting patients first: when home-based care staff prioritise loyalty to patients above the system and themselves. An ethnographic study Encompassing trust in medical AI from the perspective of medical students: a quantitative comparative study. Impact of the life-sustaining treatment decision act on organ donation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in South Korea: a multi-centre retrospective study. Opportunities and challenges of a dynamic consent-based application: personalized options for personal health data sharing and utilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1