{"title":"Identification of influencing factors and risk assessment of underground space flooding in the mountain city","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a consequence of the process of urbanization, there is an increasing reliance on and exploitation of underground spaces. Moreover, these areas are susceptible to urban waterlogging, which can be difficult to drain, potentially leading to significant risks. At present, there are few simulations in hydrodynamic models that consider underground spaces. The risk of inundation of underground spaces remains an uncertain phenomenon. This study conceptualized underground spaces as storage areas, with the aim of simulating the spatial distribution of flood risk for different return periods. We studied the flooding processes and characteristics of three underground space types. The results indicate that the flood evolution simulated by the simplified modeling method that incorporates underground space is more aligned with the actual situation. To further analyze the risk distribution of urban waterlogging, we choose the XGBoost model and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to assess the influence of specific indicators on the occurrence of urban waterlogging in mountainous regions. Our analysis revealed that key factors include density of road (DR), flow velocity (V), density of pipes (DP), elevation (DEM), and inundation height (H), with contribution rates of 23.13 %, 17.06 %, 14.67 %, 10.12 %, and 9.04 %, respectively. This analysis clarified the risk of underground inundation within the study area, which can serve as a reference point for the formulation of flood control and drainage strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924005697","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As a consequence of the process of urbanization, there is an increasing reliance on and exploitation of underground spaces. Moreover, these areas are susceptible to urban waterlogging, which can be difficult to drain, potentially leading to significant risks. At present, there are few simulations in hydrodynamic models that consider underground spaces. The risk of inundation of underground spaces remains an uncertain phenomenon. This study conceptualized underground spaces as storage areas, with the aim of simulating the spatial distribution of flood risk for different return periods. We studied the flooding processes and characteristics of three underground space types. The results indicate that the flood evolution simulated by the simplified modeling method that incorporates underground space is more aligned with the actual situation. To further analyze the risk distribution of urban waterlogging, we choose the XGBoost model and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to assess the influence of specific indicators on the occurrence of urban waterlogging in mountainous regions. Our analysis revealed that key factors include density of road (DR), flow velocity (V), density of pipes (DP), elevation (DEM), and inundation height (H), with contribution rates of 23.13 %, 17.06 %, 14.67 %, 10.12 %, and 9.04 %, respectively. This analysis clarified the risk of underground inundation within the study area, which can serve as a reference point for the formulation of flood control and drainage strategies.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.