A fuzzy framework for risk analysis of dam-break flood in climate change scenarios

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105322
Anubhav Goel , V.V. Srinivas
{"title":"A fuzzy framework for risk analysis of dam-break flood in climate change scenarios","authors":"Anubhav Goel ,&nbsp;V.V. Srinivas","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conventional Dam Break Risk (DBR) analysis methods do not consider qualitative (e.g., socio-environmental and ecological) losses in conjunction with quantitative (e.g., economic) losses. This article contributes a novel DBR analysis methodology in a fuzzy framework to address this issue. It quantifies risk effectively using a newly proposed Modified Aggregate Risk Index (MARI) that integrates information on three risk indicators (likelihood of dam-break flood, severity of consequent hazard, and exposure index). It can incorporate uncertain, ambiguous, and vague information on risk indicators by harnessing the advantages of both static and variable fuzzy set theories. The effect of uncertainty in weights assigned to different exposure indicators for MARI estimation is investigated by considering different options for weight estimation (conventional and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, simplex fuzzy binary comparison method). The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is demonstrated through a study on the Hemavathy Dam (India) and its floodplain. Furthermore, to discern the effect of climate change on DBR, its future scenarios are determined by obtaining projections of MARI considering simulations of hydrometeorological variables from eleven CMIP6 GCMs (General Circulation Models) for four climate change scenarios (SSPs: 126, 245, 370, and 585). Results indicate that dam break/breach hazards are projected to be highest for SSP 585 scenario, but the highest DBR is projected for SSP 370 and 245 scenarios owing to differences in future projections of populations. The proposed methodology appears promising in determining information for devising DBR mitigation plans, even for dams in data-sparse areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 105322"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925001463","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional Dam Break Risk (DBR) analysis methods do not consider qualitative (e.g., socio-environmental and ecological) losses in conjunction with quantitative (e.g., economic) losses. This article contributes a novel DBR analysis methodology in a fuzzy framework to address this issue. It quantifies risk effectively using a newly proposed Modified Aggregate Risk Index (MARI) that integrates information on three risk indicators (likelihood of dam-break flood, severity of consequent hazard, and exposure index). It can incorporate uncertain, ambiguous, and vague information on risk indicators by harnessing the advantages of both static and variable fuzzy set theories. The effect of uncertainty in weights assigned to different exposure indicators for MARI estimation is investigated by considering different options for weight estimation (conventional and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, simplex fuzzy binary comparison method). The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is demonstrated through a study on the Hemavathy Dam (India) and its floodplain. Furthermore, to discern the effect of climate change on DBR, its future scenarios are determined by obtaining projections of MARI considering simulations of hydrometeorological variables from eleven CMIP6 GCMs (General Circulation Models) for four climate change scenarios (SSPs: 126, 245, 370, and 585). Results indicate that dam break/breach hazards are projected to be highest for SSP 585 scenario, but the highest DBR is projected for SSP 370 and 245 scenarios owing to differences in future projections of populations. The proposed methodology appears promising in determining information for devising DBR mitigation plans, even for dams in data-sparse areas.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候变化情景下溃坝洪水风险分析的模糊框架
传统的溃坝风险(DBR)分析方法没有将定性(如社会环境和生态)损失与定量(如经济)损失结合起来考虑。本文提出了一种新的模糊框架中的DBR分析方法来解决这个问题。它使用新提出的修正综合风险指数(MARI)有效地量化风险,该指数集成了三个风险指标(溃坝洪水的可能性、随之而来的危害的严重程度和暴露指数)的信息。它可以利用静态和可变模糊集理论的优势,将不确定、模糊和模糊的信息纳入风险指标。通过考虑不同的权重估计方法(常规与模糊层次分析法、单纯模糊二元比较法),研究了不同暴露指标权重不确定性对MARI估计的影响。通过对Hemavathy大坝(印度)及其漫滩的研究,证明了所提出方法的有效性。此外,为了识别气候变化对DBR的影响,通过考虑11个CMIP6环流模式(gcm)对4种气候变化情景(ssp: 126、245、370和585)的水文气象变量的模拟,获得MARI预估来确定其未来情景。结果表明,由于种群未来预测的差异,SSP 585情景的溃坝/决口灾害预测最高,但SSP 370和SSP 245情景的DBR预测最高。所提议的方法在确定设计DBR缓解计划所需的信息方面似乎很有希望,即使对于数据稀疏地区的水坝也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Where do evacuees go? Understanding evacuation destinations in Georgia during Hurricane Milton Nature-based Solutions for landslide risk reduction in informal settlements of Salvador da Bahia, Brazil How digital intelligence technologies reshape emergency collaboration: An agent-based model of multi-actor governance Cooperation between community organizations and condominium management bodies for tsunami disaster preparedness: Evidence from designated evacuation buildings in Japan Optimization of municipal bridge retrofitting based on nationwide spatial clustering integrating seismic risk and fiscal capacity in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1