A fuzzy framework for risk analysis of dam-break flood in climate change scenarios

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105322
Anubhav Goel , V.V. Srinivas
{"title":"A fuzzy framework for risk analysis of dam-break flood in climate change scenarios","authors":"Anubhav Goel ,&nbsp;V.V. Srinivas","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conventional Dam Break Risk (DBR) analysis methods do not consider qualitative (e.g., socio-environmental and ecological) losses in conjunction with quantitative (e.g., economic) losses. This article contributes a novel DBR analysis methodology in a fuzzy framework to address this issue. It quantifies risk effectively using a newly proposed Modified Aggregate Risk Index (MARI) that integrates information on three risk indicators (likelihood of dam-break flood, severity of consequent hazard, and exposure index). It can incorporate uncertain, ambiguous, and vague information on risk indicators by harnessing the advantages of both static and variable fuzzy set theories. The effect of uncertainty in weights assigned to different exposure indicators for MARI estimation is investigated by considering different options for weight estimation (conventional and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, simplex fuzzy binary comparison method). The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is demonstrated through a study on the Hemavathy Dam (India) and its floodplain. Furthermore, to discern the effect of climate change on DBR, its future scenarios are determined by obtaining projections of MARI considering simulations of hydrometeorological variables from eleven CMIP6 GCMs (General Circulation Models) for four climate change scenarios (SSPs: 126, 245, 370, and 585). Results indicate that dam break/breach hazards are projected to be highest for SSP 585 scenario, but the highest DBR is projected for SSP 370 and 245 scenarios owing to differences in future projections of populations. The proposed methodology appears promising in determining information for devising DBR mitigation plans, even for dams in data-sparse areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 105322"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925001463","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional Dam Break Risk (DBR) analysis methods do not consider qualitative (e.g., socio-environmental and ecological) losses in conjunction with quantitative (e.g., economic) losses. This article contributes a novel DBR analysis methodology in a fuzzy framework to address this issue. It quantifies risk effectively using a newly proposed Modified Aggregate Risk Index (MARI) that integrates information on three risk indicators (likelihood of dam-break flood, severity of consequent hazard, and exposure index). It can incorporate uncertain, ambiguous, and vague information on risk indicators by harnessing the advantages of both static and variable fuzzy set theories. The effect of uncertainty in weights assigned to different exposure indicators for MARI estimation is investigated by considering different options for weight estimation (conventional and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, simplex fuzzy binary comparison method). The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is demonstrated through a study on the Hemavathy Dam (India) and its floodplain. Furthermore, to discern the effect of climate change on DBR, its future scenarios are determined by obtaining projections of MARI considering simulations of hydrometeorological variables from eleven CMIP6 GCMs (General Circulation Models) for four climate change scenarios (SSPs: 126, 245, 370, and 585). Results indicate that dam break/breach hazards are projected to be highest for SSP 585 scenario, but the highest DBR is projected for SSP 370 and 245 scenarios owing to differences in future projections of populations. The proposed methodology appears promising in determining information for devising DBR mitigation plans, even for dams in data-sparse areas.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Experience and perception of climatic hazards as drivers for adaptation strategies in coastal communities of Bangladesh Flood risk communication: Challenges and opportunities in Brazilian cities Heterogeneous effects of cyclones on households’ welfare: Evidence from Madagascar A fuzzy framework for risk analysis of dam-break flood in climate change scenarios A holistic asset-level modelling framework for a comprehensive multi-hazard risk/impact assessment: Insights from the ICARIA project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1