A comprehensive study on the validation and application of multi-lognormal distribution models for atmospheric particles

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120813
{"title":"A comprehensive study on the validation and application of multi-lognormal distribution models for atmospheric particles","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The particle number size distribution (PNSD) is crucial for evaluating air quality and mitigating environmental pollution, as particles of different sizes have diverse effects on human health and climate. However, obtaining a comprehensive understanding of PNSD is challenging due to its inherent complexities and variability. Multi-lognormal distribution models are employed to fit PNSD, as seen in climate models, but discrepancies between model fits and observed PNSD persist. This study adopts hourly data from 2017 to 2020 across eight monitoring sites in diverse environments—rural, urban, mountainous, and polar, and compares the observed PNDS with those simulated by multi-lognormal distribution models. The results demonstrated that the model generally achieved a high correlation with observed PNSD data (r<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.75), effectively capturing key characteristics of nucleation and Aitken mode particles. However, the model had a tendency to overestimate the total number concentration by approximately 1.09 times, particularly noticeable under conditions of high concentrations of smaller particles. The model successfully represented prevalent bimodal size distribution patterns in urban areas with high ultrafine particle concentrations, though its performance was slightly less accurate in scenarios involving trimodal distributions. Despite these strong correlations and the model's ability to reflect diurnal and seasonal variations, which suggests its broad applicability and utility, there were notable limitations on smaller time scales and in specific particle size ranges. These limitations were particularly evident in capturing detailed phenomena relevant to new particle formation events, indicating areas where model refinement is necessary. The results highlighted the importance of investigating discrepancies between model predictions and actual observations, which is crucial for refining climate models that utilize PNDS. The uniform comparison facilitated a detailed exploration of particle properties from model results, offering deeper insights into aerosol behavior and its environmental impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231024004886","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The particle number size distribution (PNSD) is crucial for evaluating air quality and mitigating environmental pollution, as particles of different sizes have diverse effects on human health and climate. However, obtaining a comprehensive understanding of PNSD is challenging due to its inherent complexities and variability. Multi-lognormal distribution models are employed to fit PNSD, as seen in climate models, but discrepancies between model fits and observed PNSD persist. This study adopts hourly data from 2017 to 2020 across eight monitoring sites in diverse environments—rural, urban, mountainous, and polar, and compares the observed PNDS with those simulated by multi-lognormal distribution models. The results demonstrated that the model generally achieved a high correlation with observed PNSD data (r2 > 0.75), effectively capturing key characteristics of nucleation and Aitken mode particles. However, the model had a tendency to overestimate the total number concentration by approximately 1.09 times, particularly noticeable under conditions of high concentrations of smaller particles. The model successfully represented prevalent bimodal size distribution patterns in urban areas with high ultrafine particle concentrations, though its performance was slightly less accurate in scenarios involving trimodal distributions. Despite these strong correlations and the model's ability to reflect diurnal and seasonal variations, which suggests its broad applicability and utility, there were notable limitations on smaller time scales and in specific particle size ranges. These limitations were particularly evident in capturing detailed phenomena relevant to new particle formation events, indicating areas where model refinement is necessary. The results highlighted the importance of investigating discrepancies between model predictions and actual observations, which is crucial for refining climate models that utilize PNDS. The uniform comparison facilitated a detailed exploration of particle properties from model results, offering deeper insights into aerosol behavior and its environmental impacts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于大气颗粒物多对数正态分布模型的验证和应用的综合研究
粒径分布(PNSD)对于评估空气质量和减轻环境污染至关重要,因为不同大小的颗粒对人类健康和气候有不同的影响。然而,由于其固有的复杂性和多变性,全面了解 PNSD 具有挑战性。多对数正态分布模型被用来拟合 PNSD,正如在气候模型中看到的那样,但模型拟合与观测到的 PNSD 之间仍然存在差异。本研究采用了 2017 年至 2020 年不同环境(农村、城市、山区和极地)中八个监测点的每小时数据,并将观测到的 PNDS 与多对数正态分布模型模拟的 PNDS 进行了比较。结果表明,该模型与观测到的 PNSD 数据总体上达到了较高的相关性(r2 >0.75),有效地捕捉到了成核和艾特肯模式粒子的主要特征。不过,该模型有高估总数量浓度的趋势,高估了约 1.09 倍,在较小颗粒浓度较高的条件下尤为明显。该模型成功地代表了超细粒子浓度较高的城市地区普遍存在的双模粒度分布模式,但在涉及三模分布的情况下,其准确性稍差。尽管该模型具有很强的相关性,并且能够反映昼夜和季节变化,这表明它具有广泛的适用性和实用性,但在较小的时间尺度和特定粒径范围上仍存在明显的局限性。这些局限性在捕捉与新颗粒形成事件相关的详细现象方面尤为明显,这表明有必要对模型进行改进。结果凸显了调查模式预测与实际观测之间差异的重要性,这对于完善利用 PNDS 的气候模式至关重要。统一比较有助于从模式结果中详细探索粒子特性,从而更深入地了解气溶胶行为及其对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Indoor ozone reaction products: Contributors to the respiratory health effects associated with low-level outdoor ozone Ozone variability and the impacts of associated synoptic patterns over China during summer 2016–2020 based on a regional atmospheric composition reanalysis dataset The effect of the ultra-low emission zone on PM2.5 concentration in Seoul, South Korea Significant annual variations of firework-impacted aerosols in Northeast China: Implications for rethinking the firework bans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1