Mechanical Circulatory Support Early After Pediatric Heart Transplantation - an analysis from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society.

Jacob Simmonds,Steven D Zangwill,Bethany Wisotzkey,Ryan Cantor,Hong Zhao,James K Kirklin,Dipankar Gupta
{"title":"Mechanical Circulatory Support Early After Pediatric Heart Transplantation - an analysis from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society.","authors":"Jacob Simmonds,Steven D Zangwill,Bethany Wisotzkey,Ryan Cantor,Hong Zhao,James K Kirklin,Dipankar Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe use of early Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) following pediatric heart transplantation is not well-published. This paper attempts to uncover the incidence, predisposing factors and outcomes of MCS in a large, international cohort.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database (an international, prospective, event-driven database) was retrospectively analyzed for all cases of primary heart transplant over an 11-year period (2010-2020), dividing the cohort based on need for MCS within 30 days of transplantation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 4321 primary transplants, 249 (5.8%) required MCS (230 ECMO, 19 VAD). In a Cox proportional hazard model, congenital heart disease (p = 0.0002), older donor age (p < 0.0001), and longer ischemic time (p = 0.018) were each related to an increased need for MCS; increasing recipient body surface area (p < 0.0001) and increasing donor left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.016) were both correlated with less MCS use. 1-year survival in those requiring MCS was 54.2%, compared with 94.8% in those who did not need MCS (p < 0.0001). Later survival in patients surviving to one year was similar between the groups.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMCS is used infrequently following pediatric heart transplant, and is related to donor, recipient and transplant factors. Although mortality is high, those surviving the first year post-transplant have excellent outcomes. Judicious use in those patients who would otherwise perish is therefore justified.","PeriodicalId":22654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The use of early Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) following pediatric heart transplantation is not well-published. This paper attempts to uncover the incidence, predisposing factors and outcomes of MCS in a large, international cohort. METHODS The Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database (an international, prospective, event-driven database) was retrospectively analyzed for all cases of primary heart transplant over an 11-year period (2010-2020), dividing the cohort based on need for MCS within 30 days of transplantation. RESULTS Of 4321 primary transplants, 249 (5.8%) required MCS (230 ECMO, 19 VAD). In a Cox proportional hazard model, congenital heart disease (p = 0.0002), older donor age (p < 0.0001), and longer ischemic time (p = 0.018) were each related to an increased need for MCS; increasing recipient body surface area (p < 0.0001) and increasing donor left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.016) were both correlated with less MCS use. 1-year survival in those requiring MCS was 54.2%, compared with 94.8% in those who did not need MCS (p < 0.0001). Later survival in patients surviving to one year was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS MCS is used infrequently following pediatric heart transplant, and is related to donor, recipient and transplant factors. Although mortality is high, those surviving the first year post-transplant have excellent outcomes. Judicious use in those patients who would otherwise perish is therefore justified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿心脏移植术后早期机械循环支持--来自小儿心脏移植协会的分析。
背景儿科心脏移植术后早期使用机械循环支持(MCS)的情况尚未得到充分报道。本文试图揭示一个大型国际队列中机械循环支持的发生率、诱发因素和结果。方法回顾性分析了儿科心脏移植协会数据库(一个国际性、前瞻性、事件驱动型数据库)11 年间(2010-2020 年)的所有初级心脏移植病例,根据移植后 30 天内是否需要 MCS 对队列进行划分。结果在 4321 例初级移植中,249 例(5.8%)需要 MCS(230 例 ECMO,19 例 VAD)。在 Cox 比例危险模型中,先天性心脏病(p = 0.0002)、供体年龄较大(p < 0.0001)和缺血时间较长(p = 0.018)均与 MCS 需求增加有关;受体体表面积增加(p < 0.0001)和供体左心室射血分数增加(p = 0.016)均与 MCS 使用较少有关。需要 MCS 的患者 1 年存活率为 54.2%,而不需要 MCS 的患者 1 年存活率为 94.8%(p < 0.0001)。结论 小儿心脏移植后很少使用MCS,这与供体、受体和移植因素有关。虽然死亡率很高,但移植后第一年存活的患者都有很好的预后。因此,有理由对那些否则会死亡的患者慎重使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current Approaches to Optimize Donor Heart for Transplantation. Right ventricular reserve in cardiopulmonary disease: a simultaneous hemodynamic and three-dimensional echocardiographic study. Identification and Validation of a Threshold for Early Posttransplant Bronchoalveolar Fluid Hyaluronan that Distinguishes Lung Recipients at Risk for CLAD. Impact of Tacrolimus vs. Cyclosporine on CLAD Incidence and Allograft Survival in the ISHLT Registry. Impact of Procurement Methods on Organ Rejection in Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1