Racial differences in the association between loneliness and cognitive impairment among older Black and White men

Bettina M Beech, Marino A Bruce, Ankita Siddhanta, Gillian L Marshall, Keith E Whitfield, Roland J Thorpe
{"title":"Racial differences in the association between loneliness and cognitive impairment among older Black and White men","authors":"Bettina M Beech, Marino A Bruce, Ankita Siddhanta, Gillian L Marshall, Keith E Whitfield, Roland J Thorpe","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Loneliness is a biopsychosocial stressor linked to poor health outcomes including dementia. Few studies have focused on this association among men and even fewer have examined racial disparities in loneliness and cognitive functioning among this group. The purpose of this study was to examine racial differences in the association between loneliness and cognitive functioning among men in the 2016 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Methods This cross-sectional study included Black and White men who completed the core questionnaire and the Leave Behind Questionnaire (n=2227). Any cognitive impairment was the primary outcome and was measured by a dichotomous variable derived from a modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Loneliness was the primary independent variable and was derived from the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. Modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were estimated to generate prevalence ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results Black men comprised 18.4% of the study sample; however, the proportion of this group with scores indicating cognitive impairment (35.9%) doubled the corresponding percentage of white men (17.6%). Findings from race-stratified modified Poisson regression models indicated that loneliness was associated with a higher prevalence of any cognitive impairment for White men (PR=1.24, CI:1.05-1.47), but not for Black men (PR=0.92, CI:0.73-1.16). Conclusions Our results underscore the complexity of race when investigating the association between loneliness and cognitive impairment among older men. Additional studies are needed to further examine how loneliness may have racially distinct implications for cognitive outcomes among the population.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Loneliness is a biopsychosocial stressor linked to poor health outcomes including dementia. Few studies have focused on this association among men and even fewer have examined racial disparities in loneliness and cognitive functioning among this group. The purpose of this study was to examine racial differences in the association between loneliness and cognitive functioning among men in the 2016 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Methods This cross-sectional study included Black and White men who completed the core questionnaire and the Leave Behind Questionnaire (n=2227). Any cognitive impairment was the primary outcome and was measured by a dichotomous variable derived from a modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Loneliness was the primary independent variable and was derived from the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. Modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were estimated to generate prevalence ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results Black men comprised 18.4% of the study sample; however, the proportion of this group with scores indicating cognitive impairment (35.9%) doubled the corresponding percentage of white men (17.6%). Findings from race-stratified modified Poisson regression models indicated that loneliness was associated with a higher prevalence of any cognitive impairment for White men (PR=1.24, CI:1.05-1.47), but not for Black men (PR=0.92, CI:0.73-1.16). Conclusions Our results underscore the complexity of race when investigating the association between loneliness and cognitive impairment among older men. Additional studies are needed to further examine how loneliness may have racially distinct implications for cognitive outcomes among the population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人和白人老年男性中孤独与认知障碍之间的种族差异
背景 孤独是一种生物心理社会压力,与包括痴呆症在内的不良健康后果有关。很少有研究关注男性的孤独感与认知功能之间的关系,而研究该群体中孤独感与认知功能之间的种族差异的研究更是少之又少。本研究的目的是考察 2016 年健康与退休研究(HRS)中男性孤独感与认知功能之间的种族差异。方法 这项横断面研究包括填写核心问卷和留守问卷的黑人和白人男性(2227 人)。认知障碍是主要研究结果,由认知状况电话访谈修订版中的二分变量来测量。孤独感是主要的自变量,由 3 个项目的加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表得出。对带有稳健标准误差的修正泊松回归模型进行了估计,以得出患病率比和相应的 95% 置信区间。结果 黑人男性占研究样本的 18.4%;然而,该群体中得分显示认知障碍的比例(35.9%)是白人男性相应比例(17.6%)的两倍。种族分层修正泊松回归模型的结果表明,孤独感与白人男性较高的认知障碍患病率有关(PR=1.24,CI:1.05-1.47),但与黑人男性无关(PR=0.92,CI:0.73-1.16)。结论 我们的研究结果表明,在调查老年男性孤独与认知障碍之间的关系时,种族问题非常复杂。还需要进行更多的研究,以进一步探讨孤独感如何对人群认知结果产生不同的种族影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does sleep moderate the effects of exercise training or complex mental and social activities on cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke? Secondary analysis of a randomized trial The influence of body mass index on biomarkers of cellular senescence in older adults Late-onset caloric restriction improves cognitive performance and restores circadian patterns of neurotrophic, clock and epigenetic factors in the hippocampus of male old rats Longitudinal Changes in Peak Expiratory Flow Predict Risk for Incident Dementia Association between TTV viremia, chronic inflammation, and ischemic heart disease risk: Insights from MARK-AGE and Report-Age projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1