The use of a Bayesian latent class model to estimate the test characteristics of three liver fluke diagnostic tests under New Zealand field conditions

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY Veterinary parasitology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110305
A. Dowling , K.E. Lawrence , I. Scott , L. Howe , W.E. Pomroy
{"title":"The use of a Bayesian latent class model to estimate the test characteristics of three liver fluke diagnostic tests under New Zealand field conditions","authors":"A. Dowling ,&nbsp;K.E. Lawrence ,&nbsp;I. Scott ,&nbsp;L. Howe ,&nbsp;W.E. Pomroy","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The liver fluke <em>Fasciola hepatica</em> is a trematode parasite of farmed livestock with worldwide distribution, causing chronic production losses and possible death from hepatobiliary damage. The effective management of liver fluke infection requires diagnostic tests which can accurately identify infected animals at both the individual and herd level. However, the accuracy of liver fluke diagnostic tests performed on individual New Zealand cattle is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to use a Bayesian latent class model (LCM) to estimate the test characteristics of three liver fluke diagnostic tests, the coproantigen ELISA, the IDEXX antibody ELISA and the faecal egg count. One hundred and twenty dairy cows each from two dairy farms were blood and faecal sampled in April 2021. The samples were transported to Massey University, Palmerston North, and the three diagnostic tests completed following the respective manufacturer instructions. A Bayesian LCM model, adapted from the original Hui and Walter 2 tests 2 populations model, was built to estimate the test characteristics of the three diagnostic tests in the two dairy herds. The model was implemented in JAGS using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. The first 30,000 iterations were discarded as burn-in, and the next 200,000 iterations were used to construct the posterior distributions. Uninformed priors, beta (1,1), were used as the prior distributions for the prevalence estimation and informed beta priors, based on published results, were used as the prior distributions for estimating the sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test. Model convergence was confirmed by inspection of trace plots and examination of the results of the Gelman and Rubin test. The results found that the coproantigen ELISA test was the most accurate for diagnosing liver fluke infection in individual animals with a sensitivity = 0.98 (95 % CI 0.95–1.00) and specificity = 0.95 (95 % CI 0.81–1.00) compared to the IDEXX antibody ELISA test, sensitivity = 0.39 (95 % CI 0.32–0.47) and specificity = 0.86 (95 % CI 0.75–0.96) or the FEC, sensitivity = 0.23 (95 % CI 0.17–0.30) and specificity = 0.92 (95 % CI 0.86–0.97). Based on these results clinicians should be encouraged to use the coproantigen ELISA test to diagnose liver fluke infection in individual cattle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 110305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401724001948/pdfft?md5=db699fad4993a49ad3715bb25a769b0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0304401724001948-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401724001948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The liver fluke Fasciola hepatica is a trematode parasite of farmed livestock with worldwide distribution, causing chronic production losses and possible death from hepatobiliary damage. The effective management of liver fluke infection requires diagnostic tests which can accurately identify infected animals at both the individual and herd level. However, the accuracy of liver fluke diagnostic tests performed on individual New Zealand cattle is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to use a Bayesian latent class model (LCM) to estimate the test characteristics of three liver fluke diagnostic tests, the coproantigen ELISA, the IDEXX antibody ELISA and the faecal egg count. One hundred and twenty dairy cows each from two dairy farms were blood and faecal sampled in April 2021. The samples were transported to Massey University, Palmerston North, and the three diagnostic tests completed following the respective manufacturer instructions. A Bayesian LCM model, adapted from the original Hui and Walter 2 tests 2 populations model, was built to estimate the test characteristics of the three diagnostic tests in the two dairy herds. The model was implemented in JAGS using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. The first 30,000 iterations were discarded as burn-in, and the next 200,000 iterations were used to construct the posterior distributions. Uninformed priors, beta (1,1), were used as the prior distributions for the prevalence estimation and informed beta priors, based on published results, were used as the prior distributions for estimating the sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test. Model convergence was confirmed by inspection of trace plots and examination of the results of the Gelman and Rubin test. The results found that the coproantigen ELISA test was the most accurate for diagnosing liver fluke infection in individual animals with a sensitivity = 0.98 (95 % CI 0.95–1.00) and specificity = 0.95 (95 % CI 0.81–1.00) compared to the IDEXX antibody ELISA test, sensitivity = 0.39 (95 % CI 0.32–0.47) and specificity = 0.86 (95 % CI 0.75–0.96) or the FEC, sensitivity = 0.23 (95 % CI 0.17–0.30) and specificity = 0.92 (95 % CI 0.86–0.97). Based on these results clinicians should be encouraged to use the coproantigen ELISA test to diagnose liver fluke infection in individual cattle.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用贝叶斯潜类模型估计新西兰现场条件下三种肝吸虫诊断测试的测试特征
肝吸虫(Fasciola hepatica)是一种分布于世界各地的养殖家畜的吸虫,会造成长期的生产损失,并可能因肝胆损伤而死亡。要有效控制肝吸虫感染,就必须进行诊断检测,以便在个体和畜群层面准确识别受感染的动物。然而,目前对新西兰牛个体进行的肝吸虫诊断检测的准确性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是使用贝叶斯潜类模型(LCM)来估计三种肝吸虫诊断测试的测试特征,即共抗原酶联免疫吸附试验、IDEXX 抗体酶联免疫吸附试验和粪蛋计数。2021 年 4 月,对来自两个奶牛场的 120 头奶牛分别进行了血液和粪便采样。样本被送往北帕默斯顿的梅西大学,并按照各自制造商的说明完成了三项诊断测试。建立了一个贝叶斯 LCM 模型,该模型改编自 Hui 和 Walter 最初的 2 检验 2 种群模型,用于估计两个奶牛群中三种诊断检测的检验特征。该模型在 JAGS 中使用马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗抽样法实现。前 30,000 次迭代作为 "磨合期"(burn-in)被丢弃,接下来的 200,000 次迭代用于构建后验分布。在估算患病率时,使用了无信息贝塔先验(1,1)作为先验分布;在估算每个诊断测试的灵敏度和特异性时,使用了基于已发表结果的有信息贝塔先验作为先验分布。通过观察迹线图和检查 Gelman 和 Rubin 检验的结果,确认了模型的收敛性。结果发现,共抗原酶联免疫吸附试验在诊断个体动物的肝吸虫感染方面最为准确,灵敏度 = 0.98 (95 % CI 0.95-1.00) ,特异度 = 0.95 (95 % CI 0.81-1. 00)。与 IDEXX 抗体 ELISA 试验相比,灵敏度 = 0.39 (95 % CI 0.32-0.47) 和特异性 = 0.86 (95 % CI 0.75-0.96) 或 FEC 试验灵敏度 = 0.23 (95 % CI 0.17-0.30) 和特异性 = 0.92 (95 % CI 0.86-0.97) 。)基于这些结果,临床医生应鼓励使用共抗原酶联免疫吸附试验来诊断个体牛的肝吸虫感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary parasitology
Veterinary parasitology 农林科学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership. Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A novel cross-priming amplification technique combined with lateral flow strips for rapid and visual detection of zoonotic Toxoplasma gondii. Discovery of thymoquinone analogues with high anthelmintic activity against monogenean infections in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Antiparasitic effect of (+)-catechin derived from Pseudolarix amabilis against Dactylogyrus intermedius in goldfish. A systematic review of the molecular mechanisms related to anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus: A contemporary narrative. Effects of combinations of the essential oils trans-anethole, thymol and carvacrol against larvae of the screwworm fly Cochliomyia hominivorax in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1