Assessing the effects of ex vivo hormonal exposure on oxidative responses in equine leukocytes: A preliminary study

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Veterinary immunology and immunopathology Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110827
{"title":"Assessing the effects of ex vivo hormonal exposure on oxidative responses in equine leukocytes: A preliminary study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Breed differences exist between horses and ponies in circulating concentrations of several hormones, notably ACTH and insulin. These hormones regulate stress and metabolic responses, but in other species, they also impact leukocyte oxidant responses. The effects of these hormones on equine leukocytes have not been evaluated to date. If equine leukocytes are similarly regulated, breed differences in increased plasma hormone concentrations or altered sensitivity to them at the leukocyte level could result in breed-related differences in oxidant responses or oxidative status. The objective of this study was therefore to determine the effects of <em>ex vivo</em> exposure to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), insulin, or leptin on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from leukocytes isolated from horses and ponies. We hypothesized that ACTH, α-MSH, insulin, and leptin would alter oxidant responses from equine leukocytes in a breed specific manner. Blood was collected from 10 apparently healthy Quarter horses and seven Welsh ponies for isolation of neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) via density gradient centrifugation. Cells were incubated with media (negative control), microbial antigens (positive control), or ACTH, α-MSH, leptin, or insulin for two hours. Induced ROS production was quantified with a previously validated fluorometric assay. Data was compared within groups by comparing a stimulant within a group (horses or ponies) to baseline, between groups by comparing horse response to pony response, and among stimulants using one- and two-way, repeated measures ANOVA (P&lt;0.05). There was no significant effect of breed on basal, microbial-induced, or hormone-induced ROS production from neutrophils (P=0.465) or PBMCs (P=0.749), but in neutrophils, a significant interaction between breed and stimulant was present (P=0.037). ROS production from PBMCs from horses after hormone exposure did not differ from cells exposed to media only (P=0.1520–0.8180). Similarly, neither leptin nor insulin exposure significantly induced ROS production from PBMCs from ponies (P= 0.2645 and 0.4678 respectively), but exposure to ACTH or α-MSH induced a significant increase in ROS production (P=0.0441 and 0.0440 respectively) compared to unstimulated cells. Hormones that vary in availability among breeds may induce <em>ex vivo</em> pro-oxidant responses in equine leukocytes, but specific effects are breed-, leukocyte type-, and hormone-dependent. Breed differences in hormonally induced leukocyte ROS production may warrant further investigation in the context of circulating oxidative stress and how this might relate to future disease risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242724001132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breed differences exist between horses and ponies in circulating concentrations of several hormones, notably ACTH and insulin. These hormones regulate stress and metabolic responses, but in other species, they also impact leukocyte oxidant responses. The effects of these hormones on equine leukocytes have not been evaluated to date. If equine leukocytes are similarly regulated, breed differences in increased plasma hormone concentrations or altered sensitivity to them at the leukocyte level could result in breed-related differences in oxidant responses or oxidative status. The objective of this study was therefore to determine the effects of ex vivo exposure to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), insulin, or leptin on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from leukocytes isolated from horses and ponies. We hypothesized that ACTH, α-MSH, insulin, and leptin would alter oxidant responses from equine leukocytes in a breed specific manner. Blood was collected from 10 apparently healthy Quarter horses and seven Welsh ponies for isolation of neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) via density gradient centrifugation. Cells were incubated with media (negative control), microbial antigens (positive control), or ACTH, α-MSH, leptin, or insulin for two hours. Induced ROS production was quantified with a previously validated fluorometric assay. Data was compared within groups by comparing a stimulant within a group (horses or ponies) to baseline, between groups by comparing horse response to pony response, and among stimulants using one- and two-way, repeated measures ANOVA (P<0.05). There was no significant effect of breed on basal, microbial-induced, or hormone-induced ROS production from neutrophils (P=0.465) or PBMCs (P=0.749), but in neutrophils, a significant interaction between breed and stimulant was present (P=0.037). ROS production from PBMCs from horses after hormone exposure did not differ from cells exposed to media only (P=0.1520–0.8180). Similarly, neither leptin nor insulin exposure significantly induced ROS production from PBMCs from ponies (P= 0.2645 and 0.4678 respectively), but exposure to ACTH or α-MSH induced a significant increase in ROS production (P=0.0441 and 0.0440 respectively) compared to unstimulated cells. Hormones that vary in availability among breeds may induce ex vivo pro-oxidant responses in equine leukocytes, but specific effects are breed-, leukocyte type-, and hormone-dependent. Breed differences in hormonally induced leukocyte ROS production may warrant further investigation in the context of circulating oxidative stress and how this might relate to future disease risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马和小马在几种激素的循环浓度方面存在品种差异,特别是促肾上腺皮质激素和胰岛素。这些激素能调节压力和新陈代谢反应,但在其他物种中,它们也会影响白细胞的氧化反应。迄今为止,尚未评估这些激素对马白细胞的影响。如果马白细胞也受到类似的调节,那么血浆激素浓度的增加或白细胞水平对激素敏感性的改变可能会导致氧化反应或氧化状态的品种差异。因此,本研究的目的是确定体外暴露于促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、α-促黑素细胞激素(α-MSH)、胰岛素或瘦素对从马和小马分离的白细胞中产生的活性氧(ROS)的影响。我们假设促肾上腺皮质激素、α-MSH、胰岛素和瘦素将以特定品种的方式改变马白细胞的氧化反应。从 10 匹表面健康的四分之一马和 7 匹威尔士小马身上采集血液,通过密度梯度离心分离出中性粒细胞和外周血单核细胞(PBMC)。将细胞与培养基(阴性对照组)、微生物抗原(阳性对照组)或促肾上腺皮质激素、α-MSH、瘦素或胰岛素一起培养两小时。诱导产生的 ROS 采用先前验证的荧光测定法进行量化。通过比较组内(马或小马)刺激物与基线,对组内数据进行比较;通过比较马的反应与小马的反应,对组间数据进行比较;通过单因素和双因素重复测量方差分析(P<0.05),对不同刺激物之间的数据进行比较。品种对中性粒细胞(P=0.465)或 PBMCs(P=0.749)产生的基础、微生物诱导或激素诱导的 ROS 没有明显影响,但在中性粒细胞中,品种和刺激物之间存在明显的交互作用(P=0.037)。马匹的 PBMC 在接触激素后产生的 ROS 与只接触培养基的细胞没有差异(P=0.1520-0.8180)。同样,与未受刺激的细胞相比,暴露于瘦素或胰岛素均不会显著诱导小马的 PBMC 产生 ROS(P= 0.2645 和 0.4678),但暴露于促肾上腺皮质激素或 α-MSH 会诱导 ROS 产生显著增加(P=0.0441 和 0.0440)。不同品种的荷尔蒙可能会诱导马白细胞产生体内促氧化反应,但具体效应与品种、白细胞类型和荷尔蒙有关。在循环氧化应激的背景下,激素诱导的白细胞 ROS 生成的品种差异可能值得进一步研究,以及这种差异与未来疾病风险的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease. Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above. The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the effects of ex vivo hormonal exposure on oxidative responses in equine leukocytes: A preliminary study Comparative assessment of the performance of a commercial fluorescent microsphere immunoassay and three commercial ELISAs for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae serum antibody detection Editorial Board Pilot study: Understanding canine transmissible venereal tumor through its transcriptional profile Codon optimization of voraxin α sequence enhances the immunogenicity of a recombinant vaccine against Hyalomma anatolicum infestation in rabbits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1