Soil moisture and precipitation dominate the response and recovery times of ecosystems from different types of flash drought in the Yangtze River Basin
Chen Hu , Dunxian She , Gangsheng Wang , Liping Zhang , Zhaoxia Jing , Si Hong , Zhihong Song , Jun Xia
{"title":"Soil moisture and precipitation dominate the response and recovery times of ecosystems from different types of flash drought in the Yangtze River Basin","authors":"Chen Hu , Dunxian She , Gangsheng Wang , Liping Zhang , Zhaoxia Jing , Si Hong , Zhihong Song , Jun Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flash droughts and their ecological impacts on terrestrial ecosystems have recently garnered increased attention due to their rapid intensification. However, research on the response and recovery of ecosystems to flash droughts, particularly regarding different types of flash droughts and their determinants, remains relatively limited. Here we classified flash droughts into meteorological, evaporative, and soil types based on the differences in primary drivers, and identified them in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River Basin (MLRYRB) from 2000 to 2022. We assessed the response and recovery time of ecosystems to different flash droughts based on solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), analyzed the factors affecting response and recovery times using random forest models, and identified the spatial patterns of dominant factors through partial correlation analysis. Our results revealed distinct characteristics among different flash droughts, with soil flash droughts exhibiting the highest frequency and longest duration. The average response time and recovery times ranged from 15.7 to 19.2 days and from 59.6 to 69.2 days, respectively, for different flash droughts, with soil flash droughts presenting the longest response time and shortest recovery time. Among all vegetations, mixed forests exhibited the longest response time to meteorological and soil flash droughts, while woody savannas presented significantly longer recovery time from evaporative and soil flash droughts. Analysis of primary drivers indicated that precipitation predominantly determined the response time to meteorological and evaporative flash droughts, while surface soil moisture played a primary role in soil flash drought. Furthermore, surface soil moisture was found to determine the recovery time from all flash droughts in over 57 % of pixels. Our findings could offer valuable insights into quantifying the ecological impacts and drivers of different flash droughts on ecosystems, deepening our understanding of ecosystem responses to flash droughts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"358 ","pages":"Article 110236"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003496","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flash droughts and their ecological impacts on terrestrial ecosystems have recently garnered increased attention due to their rapid intensification. However, research on the response and recovery of ecosystems to flash droughts, particularly regarding different types of flash droughts and their determinants, remains relatively limited. Here we classified flash droughts into meteorological, evaporative, and soil types based on the differences in primary drivers, and identified them in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River Basin (MLRYRB) from 2000 to 2022. We assessed the response and recovery time of ecosystems to different flash droughts based on solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), analyzed the factors affecting response and recovery times using random forest models, and identified the spatial patterns of dominant factors through partial correlation analysis. Our results revealed distinct characteristics among different flash droughts, with soil flash droughts exhibiting the highest frequency and longest duration. The average response time and recovery times ranged from 15.7 to 19.2 days and from 59.6 to 69.2 days, respectively, for different flash droughts, with soil flash droughts presenting the longest response time and shortest recovery time. Among all vegetations, mixed forests exhibited the longest response time to meteorological and soil flash droughts, while woody savannas presented significantly longer recovery time from evaporative and soil flash droughts. Analysis of primary drivers indicated that precipitation predominantly determined the response time to meteorological and evaporative flash droughts, while surface soil moisture played a primary role in soil flash drought. Furthermore, surface soil moisture was found to determine the recovery time from all flash droughts in over 57 % of pixels. Our findings could offer valuable insights into quantifying the ecological impacts and drivers of different flash droughts on ecosystems, deepening our understanding of ecosystem responses to flash droughts.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.