The association between methionine synthase reductase c.66A>G variant and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102849
Jintuo Zhou , Yanting Zhu , Yin Liu, Hairong Zhan, Peiguang Niu, Huajiao Chen, Jinhua Zhang
{"title":"The association between methionine synthase reductase c.66A>G variant and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jintuo Zhou ,&nbsp;Yanting Zhu ,&nbsp;Yin Liu,&nbsp;Hairong Zhan,&nbsp;Peiguang Niu,&nbsp;Huajiao Chen,&nbsp;Jinhua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the association between methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) c.66A&gt;G variant and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) susceptibility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of literature published before February 25, 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) was used to estimate the association between MTRR c.66A&gt;G variant and RPL susceptibility. The I squared (I<sup>2</sup>) statistic and Q statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies. And Begg's test and Egger's regression were then used to test the existence of publication bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this meta-analysis, we included 10 studies comprising 1842 RPL cases and 2173 healthy pregnant women to investigate the relationship between MTRR c.66A&gt;G variants and the susceptibility of RPL. In the overall population analysis, MTRR c.66A&gt;G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL in different comparison models. Since 9 of the included studies were conducted in Asia, we performed analyses separately for Asian populations, including a total of 1855 cases and 2127 controls. Results showed, in Asian populations, there is no significant correlation between c.66A&gt;G variant and the risk of RPL. Subgroup analyses according to ethnicity and country yielded similar results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggested that the MTRR c.66A&gt;G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 10","pages":"Article 102849"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the association between methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) c.66A>G variant and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) susceptibility.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of literature published before February 25, 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) was used to estimate the association between MTRR c.66A>G variant and RPL susceptibility. The I squared (I2) statistic and Q statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies. And Begg's test and Egger's regression were then used to test the existence of publication bias.

Results

In this meta-analysis, we included 10 studies comprising 1842 RPL cases and 2173 healthy pregnant women to investigate the relationship between MTRR c.66A>G variants and the susceptibility of RPL. In the overall population analysis, MTRR c.66A>G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL in different comparison models. Since 9 of the included studies were conducted in Asia, we performed analyses separately for Asian populations, including a total of 1855 cases and 2127 controls. Results showed, in Asian populations, there is no significant correlation between c.66A>G variant and the risk of RPL. Subgroup analyses according to ethnicity and country yielded similar results.

Conclusion

Our findings suggested that the MTRR c.66A>G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛋氨酸合成酶还原酶 c.66A>G 变异与复发性妊娠失败风险之间的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析
目的我们旨在对蛋氨酸合成酶还原酶(MTRR)c.66A>G 变异与复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)易感性之间的关联进行全面的荟萃分析。方法我们使用 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 对 2023 年 2 月 25 日之前发表的文献进行了全面的系统检索。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估纳入研究的质量。采用几率比(OR)来估计 MTRR c.66A>G 变异与 RPL 易感性之间的关系。I平方(I2)统计量和Q统计量用于评估纳入研究之间的异质性。结果在这项荟萃分析中,我们纳入了 10 项研究,包括 1842 例 RPL 病例和 2173 例健康孕妇,以探讨 MTRR c.66A>G 变异与 RPL 易感性之间的关系。在总体人群分析中,在不同的比较模型中,MTRR c.66A>G变异与RPL风险无明显相关性。由于纳入的研究中有 9 项是在亚洲进行的,因此我们对亚洲人群进行了单独分析,共纳入了 1855 例病例和 2127 例对照。结果显示,在亚洲人群中,c.66A>G 变异与 RPL 风险之间没有明显的相关性。结论我们的研究结果表明,MTRR c.66A>G变异与RPL风险无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1