{"title":"The association between methionine synthase reductase c.66A>G variant and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jintuo Zhou , Yanting Zhu , Yin Liu, Hairong Zhan, Peiguang Niu, Huajiao Chen, Jinhua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the association between methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) c.66A>G variant and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) susceptibility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of literature published before February 25, 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) was used to estimate the association between MTRR c.66A>G variant and RPL susceptibility. The I squared (I<sup>2</sup>) statistic and Q statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies. And Begg's test and Egger's regression were then used to test the existence of publication bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this meta-analysis, we included 10 studies comprising 1842 RPL cases and 2173 healthy pregnant women to investigate the relationship between MTRR c.66A>G variants and the susceptibility of RPL. In the overall population analysis, MTRR c.66A>G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL in different comparison models. Since 9 of the included studies were conducted in Asia, we performed analyses separately for Asian populations, including a total of 1855 cases and 2127 controls. Results showed, in Asian populations, there is no significant correlation between c.66A>G variant and the risk of RPL. Subgroup analyses according to ethnicity and country yielded similar results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggested that the MTRR c.66A>G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 10","pages":"Article 102849"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
We aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the association between methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) c.66A>G variant and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) susceptibility.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of literature published before February 25, 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) was used to estimate the association between MTRR c.66A>G variant and RPL susceptibility. The I squared (I2) statistic and Q statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies. And Begg's test and Egger's regression were then used to test the existence of publication bias.
Results
In this meta-analysis, we included 10 studies comprising 1842 RPL cases and 2173 healthy pregnant women to investigate the relationship between MTRR c.66A>G variants and the susceptibility of RPL. In the overall population analysis, MTRR c.66A>G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL in different comparison models. Since 9 of the included studies were conducted in Asia, we performed analyses separately for Asian populations, including a total of 1855 cases and 2127 controls. Results showed, in Asian populations, there is no significant correlation between c.66A>G variant and the risk of RPL. Subgroup analyses according to ethnicity and country yielded similar results.
Conclusion
Our findings suggested that the MTRR c.66A>G variant was not significantly associated with the risk of RPL.
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.