Dániel Lakatos, Martina Idler, Selina Stibitzky, Jennifer Amann, Jakob Schuschkewitz, Dominik Krayl, Judith Liebau, Jan-Hendrik Grosch, Erik Arango Gutierrez, Simon Kluters
{"title":"Buffer system improves the removal of host cell protein impurities in monoclonal antibody purification","authors":"Dániel Lakatos, Martina Idler, Selina Stibitzky, Jennifer Amann, Jakob Schuschkewitz, Dominik Krayl, Judith Liebau, Jan-Hendrik Grosch, Erik Arango Gutierrez, Simon Kluters","doi":"10.1002/bit.28844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polysorbates (PS) are commonly used as stabilizers of biopharmaceuticals such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). However, they are prone to chemical and enzymatic degradation. The latter can be caused by residual host cell proteins (HCPs) in the drug substance. Degradation affects the functionality of the PS surfactant which can lead to formation of particles. An increasing number of publications describe enzymatic PS degradation. Significant efforts have been made to characterize HCP removal during Downstream Processing (DSP) of mAbs and to develop mitigation strategies. Here we describe the use of glycine buffer for acidic elution in Protein A affinity chromatography compared to acetate buffer, which is more commonly used in the biopharmaceutical industry. Increased turbidity was observed during pH re-adjustment after low pH virus inactivation when using glycine buffer. Analytical data suggests that this turbidity is caused by the formation of precipitates which include HCP and DNA impurities. Additionally, as a zwitterion, glycine does not contribute to conductivity; this further enhances HCP removal during anion-exchange flow-through chromatography. Although glycine is well known as a possible elution buffer for Protein A affinity chromatography, its positive impact on HCP removal and PS stability have not yet been described in literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":9168,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Bioengineering","volume":"121 12","pages":"3869-3880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bit.28844","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bit.28844","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polysorbates (PS) are commonly used as stabilizers of biopharmaceuticals such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). However, they are prone to chemical and enzymatic degradation. The latter can be caused by residual host cell proteins (HCPs) in the drug substance. Degradation affects the functionality of the PS surfactant which can lead to formation of particles. An increasing number of publications describe enzymatic PS degradation. Significant efforts have been made to characterize HCP removal during Downstream Processing (DSP) of mAbs and to develop mitigation strategies. Here we describe the use of glycine buffer for acidic elution in Protein A affinity chromatography compared to acetate buffer, which is more commonly used in the biopharmaceutical industry. Increased turbidity was observed during pH re-adjustment after low pH virus inactivation when using glycine buffer. Analytical data suggests that this turbidity is caused by the formation of precipitates which include HCP and DNA impurities. Additionally, as a zwitterion, glycine does not contribute to conductivity; this further enhances HCP removal during anion-exchange flow-through chromatography. Although glycine is well known as a possible elution buffer for Protein A affinity chromatography, its positive impact on HCP removal and PS stability have not yet been described in literature.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology & Bioengineering publishes Perspectives, Articles, Reviews, Mini-Reviews, and Communications to the Editor that embrace all aspects of biotechnology. These include:
-Enzyme systems and their applications, including enzyme reactors, purification, and applied aspects of protein engineering
-Animal-cell biotechnology, including media development
-Applied aspects of cellular physiology, metabolism, and energetics
-Biocatalysis and applied enzymology, including enzyme reactors, protein engineering, and nanobiotechnology
-Biothermodynamics
-Biofuels, including biomass and renewable resource engineering
-Biomaterials, including delivery systems and materials for tissue engineering
-Bioprocess engineering, including kinetics and modeling of biological systems, transport phenomena in bioreactors, bioreactor design, monitoring, and control
-Biosensors and instrumentation
-Computational and systems biology, including bioinformatics and genomic/proteomic studies
-Environmental biotechnology, including biofilms, algal systems, and bioremediation
-Metabolic and cellular engineering
-Plant-cell biotechnology
-Spectroscopic and other analytical techniques for biotechnological applications
-Synthetic biology
-Tissue engineering, stem-cell bioengineering, regenerative medicine, gene therapy and delivery systems
The editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their immediate or future impact on biotechnological processes, and their contribution to the advancement of biochemical engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocessing, description of established equipment, and routine applications of established methodologies (e.g., control strategies, modeling, experimental methods) is discouraged. Theoretical papers will be judged based on the novelty of the approach and their potential impact, or on their novel capability to predict and elucidate experimental observations.