Classification and Treatment of Complications Related to Titanium and Biodegradable Miniplates Using the Lip-Split Transmandibular Approach for Oral and Oropharyngeal Oncological Surgery.

Wei-Liang Chen,Yu-Peng Tao,Zi-Xian Huang,De-Tao Chen
{"title":"Classification and Treatment of Complications Related to Titanium and Biodegradable Miniplates Using the Lip-Split Transmandibular Approach for Oral and Oropharyngeal Oncological Surgery.","authors":"Wei-Liang Chen,Yu-Peng Tao,Zi-Xian Huang,De-Tao Chen","doi":"10.1097/scs.0000000000010638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere is a lack of classified definitions and corresponding treatment principles for complications related to titanium miniplate (TMP) and biodegradable miniplate (BMP).\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nThis study proposes a classification system for complications related to TMP and BMP osteosynthesis and evaluates the effectiveness of the classification system in the treatment of the complications.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nOne hundred forty-two patients with advanced-stage oral cavity and oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) underwent oncological surgery via lip-split transmandibular (LTM) approach including midline, paramedian, stair-step, and triangle. 54.9% of patients were treated with TMP, and 45.1% were treated with BMP for osteosynthesis. The classification of complications is divided into grades 0, 1, 2, and 3. Grade 0 is defined as having no complications. The evaluation criteria for treating complications were significant improvement, partial improvement, and no improvement.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAll patients underwent en bloc resection of the tumor with histologically negative margins via the LTM approach. The overall success rate of the flap is 98.6%. 25.3%, 48.6%, 14.8%, and 11.3% of patients were treated with midline, paramedian, stair-step, and triangular osteotomy approaches, respectively. A significant increase in the number of paramedian osteotomies was observed compared with other types of osteotomy (P < 0.05). Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 developed in 54.2%, 12.0%, 14.8%, and 19.0% of patients, respectively. No significant differences in the grade of complications were observed between the TMP group and the BMP group. Sixty-five patients with complications, grades 1, 2, and 3 occurred in 26.2%, 32.3%, and 41.5% of patients. The midline, paramedian, stair-step, and triangle osteotomy approaches were used in 26.1%, 47.7%, and 10.8%, respectively. The incidence of complications in the paramedian osteotomy was significantly higher than that in the other osteotomy (P < 0.05). 83.1% of patients showed significant improvement, 10.8% showed partial improvement, and 6.1% showed no improvement. No significant differences in the treatment outcomes were observed between the TMP group and the BMP group.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe incidence of complications in paramedian osteotomy is also significantly higher than 3 types of osteotomy, and 83.1% of patients showed significant improvement in complications. The complication classification system related to TMP and BMP osteosynthesis are easy to implement and feasible in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":501649,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is a lack of classified definitions and corresponding treatment principles for complications related to titanium miniplate (TMP) and biodegradable miniplate (BMP). AIMS This study proposes a classification system for complications related to TMP and BMP osteosynthesis and evaluates the effectiveness of the classification system in the treatment of the complications. METHODS One hundred forty-two patients with advanced-stage oral cavity and oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) underwent oncological surgery via lip-split transmandibular (LTM) approach including midline, paramedian, stair-step, and triangle. 54.9% of patients were treated with TMP, and 45.1% were treated with BMP for osteosynthesis. The classification of complications is divided into grades 0, 1, 2, and 3. Grade 0 is defined as having no complications. The evaluation criteria for treating complications were significant improvement, partial improvement, and no improvement. RESULTS All patients underwent en bloc resection of the tumor with histologically negative margins via the LTM approach. The overall success rate of the flap is 98.6%. 25.3%, 48.6%, 14.8%, and 11.3% of patients were treated with midline, paramedian, stair-step, and triangular osteotomy approaches, respectively. A significant increase in the number of paramedian osteotomies was observed compared with other types of osteotomy (P < 0.05). Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 developed in 54.2%, 12.0%, 14.8%, and 19.0% of patients, respectively. No significant differences in the grade of complications were observed between the TMP group and the BMP group. Sixty-five patients with complications, grades 1, 2, and 3 occurred in 26.2%, 32.3%, and 41.5% of patients. The midline, paramedian, stair-step, and triangle osteotomy approaches were used in 26.1%, 47.7%, and 10.8%, respectively. The incidence of complications in the paramedian osteotomy was significantly higher than that in the other osteotomy (P < 0.05). 83.1% of patients showed significant improvement, 10.8% showed partial improvement, and 6.1% showed no improvement. No significant differences in the treatment outcomes were observed between the TMP group and the BMP group. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of complications in paramedian osteotomy is also significantly higher than 3 types of osteotomy, and 83.1% of patients showed significant improvement in complications. The complication classification system related to TMP and BMP osteosynthesis are easy to implement and feasible in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在口腔和口咽肿瘤手术中使用唇裂经下颌入路的钛和生物可降解微型板相关并发症的分类和治疗。
AIMSThis study proposes a classification system for complications related to TMP and BMP osteosynthesis and evaluating the effectiveness of the classification system in the treatment of the complications.AIMSThis研究提出了TMP和BMP骨合成相关并发症的分类系统,并评估了该分类系统在并发症治疗中的有效性。方法:142例晚期口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者接受了肿瘤手术,手术方式包括唇裂经下颌(LTM)入路,包括中线入路、副中线入路、阶梯入路和三角入路。54.9%的患者接受了TMP治疗,45.1%的患者接受了BMP骨合成治疗。并发症分为 0、1、2 和 3 级。0 级定义为无并发症。治疗并发症的评价标准为明显改善、部分改善和无改善。结果所有患者均通过LTM方法进行了肿瘤全切,组织学切缘阴性。皮瓣的总体成功率为 98.6%。分别有 25.3%、48.6%、14.8% 和 11.3% 的患者采用了中线、副中线、阶梯和三角截骨方法。与其他类型的截骨术相比,副中线截骨术的数量明显增加(P < 0.05)。分别有 54.2%、12.0%、14.8% 和 19.0% 的患者出现 0、1、2 和 3 级并发症。TMP 组和 BMP 组的并发症等级无明显差异。65名患者出现了并发症,1级、2级和3级并发症发生率分别为26.2%、32.3%和41.5%。分别有 26.1%、47.7% 和 10.8%的患者采用了中线、副中线、阶梯和三角截骨法。副中线截骨术的并发症发生率明显高于其他截骨术(P < 0.05)。83.1%的患者病情明显好转,10.8%的患者病情部分好转,6.1%的患者病情无好转。结论骨旁截骨术的并发症发生率也明显高于三种截骨术,83.1%的患者并发症明显改善。与 TMP 和 BMP 截骨术相关的并发症分类系统易于实施,在临床实践中可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Correlation Between Types of Orbital Fractures and Ocular Symptoms, and the Effect of Manual Preformed and Patient-Specific Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study. Qualitative Research on the Causes of Kinesiophobia in Postoperative Cerebellar Tumor Patients. Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Prevention and Treatment of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Reduces the Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Big Data Analysis of Facial Fracture Epidemiology in South Korea From 2015 to 2020: Impacts of Aging and Personal Mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1