Exploring Twitter as a social learning space for education scholars: An analysis of value‐added contributions to the #TPACK network

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH British Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1111/bjet.13521
Liz Ebersole, Teresa S. Foulger, Yi Jin, Daniel James Mourlam
{"title":"Exploring Twitter as a social learning space for education scholars: An analysis of value‐added contributions to the #TPACK network","authors":"Liz Ebersole, Teresa S. Foulger, Yi Jin, Daniel James Mourlam","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media has been shown to be an efficient way to engage in networked participatory scholarship (NPS), which is defined as the use of online social networks to share and further develop scholarship. As leaders in the field, educational technology scholars should be at the forefront of this practice. We used social network analysis (SNA) to examine the structure and characteristics of the #TPACK Twitter network and to determine whether and how the users were engaging in value‐added NPS. Our findings revealed that the #TPACK Twitter network was loosely organized, and users were not very well connected outside of their clusters. Our findings also revealed that #TPACK tweets largely did not represent value‐added NPS. The majority of posts lacked useful context, were limited to merely sharing links to resources and did not establish meaningful interactions among users. The implications of this study provide a new direction for educational technology researchers and PK‐12 practitioners to approach social media from a value‐added standpoint and to apply value‐added NPS to improve their use of social media to advance research, enhance professional learning and forge closer ties between researchers and practitioners.<jats:label/><jats:boxed-text content-type=\"box\" position=\"anchor\"><jats:caption>Practitioner notes</jats:caption>What is already known about this topic <jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Publication in high‐impact academic journals and measuring research impact through citations and journal indexing is still the dominant practice in research dissemination; however, there is growth in the use of alternative methods and the use of altmetrics to measure the impact of these methods.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Scholars struggle with using social media in ways that align with networked participatory scholarship (NPS).</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Social network analysis (SNA) is the study of the structure and characteristics of the relationships that form in social networks, and can be used to fanalyze an online social network.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>What this paper adds <jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Value‐added social learning theory and NPS can be used in SNA to both evaluate and inform scholars' social media practices.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Educational technology scholars and practitioners struggle with using social media for value‐added NPS.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Lost opportunities for value‐added NPS that were documented in this study include lack of engagement with the wider network, not sharing the role of spreading ideas and not making value‐added contributions.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>Implications for practice and policy <jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Education scholars should use SNA as a tool to evaluate the level of value‐added NPS in the social media networks around areas of study they care about so that they can develop both personal and systemic plans for implementing value‐added NPS to create more dynamic learning spaces on these platforms.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Institutions should investigate ways they can remove barriers and incentivize value‐added NPS.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Innovations in the dissemination of scholarship should involve helping scholars to develop the skills needed for successful value‐added NPS.</jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:boxed-text>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media has been shown to be an efficient way to engage in networked participatory scholarship (NPS), which is defined as the use of online social networks to share and further develop scholarship. As leaders in the field, educational technology scholars should be at the forefront of this practice. We used social network analysis (SNA) to examine the structure and characteristics of the #TPACK Twitter network and to determine whether and how the users were engaging in value‐added NPS. Our findings revealed that the #TPACK Twitter network was loosely organized, and users were not very well connected outside of their clusters. Our findings also revealed that #TPACK tweets largely did not represent value‐added NPS. The majority of posts lacked useful context, were limited to merely sharing links to resources and did not establish meaningful interactions among users. The implications of this study provide a new direction for educational technology researchers and PK‐12 practitioners to approach social media from a value‐added standpoint and to apply value‐added NPS to improve their use of social media to advance research, enhance professional learning and forge closer ties between researchers and practitioners.Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Publication in high‐impact academic journals and measuring research impact through citations and journal indexing is still the dominant practice in research dissemination; however, there is growth in the use of alternative methods and the use of altmetrics to measure the impact of these methods. Scholars struggle with using social media in ways that align with networked participatory scholarship (NPS). Social network analysis (SNA) is the study of the structure and characteristics of the relationships that form in social networks, and can be used to fanalyze an online social network. What this paper adds Value‐added social learning theory and NPS can be used in SNA to both evaluate and inform scholars' social media practices. Educational technology scholars and practitioners struggle with using social media for value‐added NPS. Lost opportunities for value‐added NPS that were documented in this study include lack of engagement with the wider network, not sharing the role of spreading ideas and not making value‐added contributions. Implications for practice and policy Education scholars should use SNA as a tool to evaluate the level of value‐added NPS in the social media networks around areas of study they care about so that they can develop both personal and systemic plans for implementing value‐added NPS to create more dynamic learning spaces on these platforms. Institutions should investigate ways they can remove barriers and incentivize value‐added NPS. Innovations in the dissemination of scholarship should involve helping scholars to develop the skills needed for successful value‐added NPS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索作为教育学者社交学习空间的 Twitter:对 #TPACK 网络增值贡献的分析
社交媒体已被证明是从事网络参与式学术研究(NPS)的有效途径,NPS 的定义是利用在线社交网络分享和进一步发展学术研究。作为该领域的领导者,教育技术学者应站在这一实践的前沿。我们使用社交网络分析(SNA)来研究 #TPACK Twitter 网络的结构和特征,并确定用户是否以及如何参与增值的 NPS。我们的研究结果表明,#TPACK Twitter 网络的组织结构松散,用户在其集群之外的联系并不紧密。我们的研究结果还显示,#TPACK 推文在很大程度上并不代表增值的 NPS。大多数帖子缺乏有用的背景,仅限于分享资源链接,没有在用户之间建立有意义的互动。这项研究的意义为教育技术研究人员和 PK-12 从业人员提供了一个新的方向,即从增值的角度来看待社交媒体,并应用增值的 NPS 来改进他们对社交媒体的使用,以推进研究、加强专业学习并在研究人员和从业人员之间建立更紧密的联系。实践者笔记有关本主题的已知内容 在影响力大的学术期刊上发表文章,并通过引用和期刊索引来衡量研究影响力,这仍然是研究传播的主流做法;但是,使用替代方法以及使用 Altmetrics 来衡量这些方法的影响力的情况正在增加。学者们在以符合网络参与式学术研究(NPS)的方式使用社交媒体方面举步维艰。社会网络分析(SNA)是对社会网络中形成的关系的结构和特征的研究,可用于分析在线社会网络。本文的补充内容 社会学习增值理论和 NPS 可用于 SNA,以评估和指导学者的社交媒体实践。教育技术学者和从业人员在利用社交媒体实现增值 NPS 方面存在困难。本研究中记录的失去增值 NPS 的机会包括:缺乏与更广泛网络的接触、没有分担传播思想的角色以及没有做出增值贡献。对实践和政策的启示 教育学者应使用 SNA 作为工具,评估他们所关注的研究领域的社交媒体网络中的增值 NPS 水平,从而制定个人和系统计划,实施增值 NPS,在这些平台上创建更具活力的学习空间。各院校应研究如何消除障碍并激励增值的 NPS。学术传播的创新应包括帮助学者发展成功实现增值新葡萄京娱乐场网址所需的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A multimodal approach to support teacher, researcher and AI collaboration in STEM+C learning environments Exploring Twitter as a social learning space for education scholars: An analysis of value‐added contributions to the #TPACK network Youths' relationship with culture: Tracing sixth graders' learning through designing culturally centred multimedia projects Seeking to support preservice teachers' responsive teaching: Leveraging artificial intelligence‐supported virtual simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1