Revisiting the 1934 Mw 8.2 Bihar Nepal earthquake – Simulation of Broadband ground motions

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Journal International Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggae336
Jahnabi Basu, Sreejaya KP, S T G Raghukanth
{"title":"Revisiting the 1934 Mw 8.2 Bihar Nepal earthquake – Simulation of Broadband ground motions","authors":"Jahnabi Basu, Sreejaya KP, S T G Raghukanth","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The 1934 Mw 8.2 Bihar-Nepal earthquake was one of the devastating earthquakes, which made seismologists realize the importance of proper seismic hazard analysis and design aspects in India. The event occurred way before proper seismic networks were implemented and hence there are no recorded ground motions available for this event. The present study, thus aims to generate possible ground motions for the 1934 Mw 8.2 Bihar-Nepal event. The complex geographical features, ambiguous source information, and lack of ground motion data make the simulation and validation of ground motions very difficult. In this regard, the broadband (BB) ground motions are simulated and validated for the most recent well-documented Himalayan event, i.e., the 2015 Mw 7.9 Nepal earthquake in order to calibrate the model and simulation methodology. For this purpose, the computational model presented by Sreejaya et al. (2023) is extended up to a region of 1000 km × 670 km (longitude 80-89 °E and latitude 23-30 °N) in the Indo-Gangetic Basin to simulate the low-frequency (LF) ground motions using spectral element method (Komatitsch and Tromp 1999). These deterministically simulated LF ground motions are combined with stochastically simulated high-frequency (HF) ground motions based on an improved seismological model following Otarola and Ruiz (2016). The seismic moment and dimensions of the rupture plane presented by Pettanati et al. (2017) are used to generate ten samples for the finite fault source model having different slip distribution along the rupture plane as a random field (Mai and Beroza 2000; 2002). The BB ground motions (0.01–25 Hz) are obtained by merging LF and HF ground motions in the time domain by matching them at a frequency of ∼0.3 Hz. Such BB results are simulated at a grid of stations and at locations where Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) intensity values are available. The estimated MMI values and the observed MMI values are compared to emphasize the efficacy of the model. The maximum PGA estimated from the simulated ground motions in horizontal and vertical directions are observed to be 0.48 g and 0.4 g. Further, 5% damped response spectra and spectral amplification are analyzed concerning the sediment depth of the Indo-Gangetic Basin. The results from the study can serve as inputs for dynamic analysis and the design of earthquake-resistant structures across different locations in the Indo-Gangetic Basin.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The 1934 Mw 8.2 Bihar-Nepal earthquake was one of the devastating earthquakes, which made seismologists realize the importance of proper seismic hazard analysis and design aspects in India. The event occurred way before proper seismic networks were implemented and hence there are no recorded ground motions available for this event. The present study, thus aims to generate possible ground motions for the 1934 Mw 8.2 Bihar-Nepal event. The complex geographical features, ambiguous source information, and lack of ground motion data make the simulation and validation of ground motions very difficult. In this regard, the broadband (BB) ground motions are simulated and validated for the most recent well-documented Himalayan event, i.e., the 2015 Mw 7.9 Nepal earthquake in order to calibrate the model and simulation methodology. For this purpose, the computational model presented by Sreejaya et al. (2023) is extended up to a region of 1000 km × 670 km (longitude 80-89 °E and latitude 23-30 °N) in the Indo-Gangetic Basin to simulate the low-frequency (LF) ground motions using spectral element method (Komatitsch and Tromp 1999). These deterministically simulated LF ground motions are combined with stochastically simulated high-frequency (HF) ground motions based on an improved seismological model following Otarola and Ruiz (2016). The seismic moment and dimensions of the rupture plane presented by Pettanati et al. (2017) are used to generate ten samples for the finite fault source model having different slip distribution along the rupture plane as a random field (Mai and Beroza 2000; 2002). The BB ground motions (0.01–25 Hz) are obtained by merging LF and HF ground motions in the time domain by matching them at a frequency of ∼0.3 Hz. Such BB results are simulated at a grid of stations and at locations where Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) intensity values are available. The estimated MMI values and the observed MMI values are compared to emphasize the efficacy of the model. The maximum PGA estimated from the simulated ground motions in horizontal and vertical directions are observed to be 0.48 g and 0.4 g. Further, 5% damped response spectra and spectral amplification are analyzed concerning the sediment depth of the Indo-Gangetic Basin. The results from the study can serve as inputs for dynamic analysis and the design of earthquake-resistant structures across different locations in the Indo-Gangetic Basin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重温 1934 年尼泊尔比哈尔邦 8.2 级地震--宽带地动模拟
摘要 1934 年比哈尔-尼泊尔 8.2 级地震是破坏性地震之一,它使地震学家认识到在印度进行适当的地震危险分析和设计的重要性。这次地震发生在适当的地震网络建立之前,因此没有关于这次地震的地面运动记录。因此,本研究旨在为 1934 年比哈尔-尼泊尔 8.2 级地震生成可能的地面运动。复杂的地理特征、模糊的震源信息以及地面运动数据的缺乏,使得地面运动的模拟和验证非常困难。为此,我们对最近有据可查的喜马拉雅事件,即 2015 年尼泊尔 7.9 级地震,进行了宽带(BB)地动模拟和验证,以校准模型和模拟方法。为此,Sreejaya 等人(2023 年)提出的计算模型被扩展到印度-恒河盆地 1000 km × 670 km 的区域(东经 80-89 °,北纬 23-30 °),使用谱元法(Komatitsch 和 Tromp,1999 年)模拟低频(LF)地面运动。根据 Otarola 和 Ruiz(2016 年)改进的地震学模型,这些确定性模拟的低频地面运动与随机模拟的高频地面运动相结合。Pettanati 等人(2017 年)提出的地震力矩和断裂面尺寸被用来为有限断层源模型生成 10 个样本,这些样本沿断裂面的滑动分布不同,如同一个随机场(Mai 和 Beroza,2000 年;2002 年)。BB 地面运动(0.01-25 Hz)是通过在 ∼0.3 Hz 频率上匹配时域中的低频和高频地面运动而合并得到的。这种 BB 结果是在网格站点和有修正麦加利烈度(MMI)烈度值的地点进行模拟的。将估计的 MMI 值与观测到的 MMI 值进行比较,以强调模型的有效性。根据水平和垂直方向的模拟地面运动估算出的最大 PGA 值分别为 0.48 g 和 0.4 g。此外,还分析了印度-甘肃盆地沉积深度的 5%阻尼响应谱和谱放大。研究结果可作为动态分析和印度洋-湄公河流域不同地点抗震结构设计的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Modelling of non-linear elastic constitutive relationship and numerical simulation of rocks based on the Preisach-Mayergoyz space model Marginal stability analyses for thermochemical convection and its implications for the dynamics of continental lithosphere and core-mantle boundary regions Deep neural helmholtz operators for 3D elastic wave propagation and inversion Event locations: Speeding up grid searches using quadratic interpolation Internal deformation of the North Andean Sliver in Ecuador-southern Colombia observed by InSAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1