Use of emergency departments by children and young people following telephone triage: a large database study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2023-213619
Akshay Kumar, Kerryn Husk, Rebecca Simpson, Graham D Johnson, Christopher Burton
{"title":"Use of emergency departments by children and young people following telephone triage: a large database study","authors":"Akshay Kumar, Kerryn Husk, Rebecca Simpson, Graham D Johnson, Christopher Burton","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Although one objective of NHS 111 is to ease the strain on urgent and emergency care services, studies suggest the telephone triage service may be contributing to increased demand. Moreover, while parents and caregivers generally find NHS 111 satisfactory, concerns exist about its integration with the healthcare system and the appropriateness of advice. This study aimed to analyse the advice provided in NHS 111 calls, the duration between the call and ED attendance, and the outcomes of such attendances made by children and young people (C&YP). Methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out of C&YP (≤17) attending an ED in the Yorkshire and Humber region of the UK following contact with NHS 111 between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2017. This linked-data study examined NHS 111 calls and ED outcomes. Lognormal mixture distributions were fit to compare the time taken to attend ED following calls. Logistic mixed effects regression models were used to identify predictors of low-acuity NHS 111-related ED attendances. Results Our study of 348 401 NHS 111 calls found they were primarily concerning children aged 0–4 years. Overall, 13.1% of calls were followed by an ED attendance, with a median arrival time of 51 minutes. Of the 34 664 calls advising ED attendance 41% complied, arriving with a median of 38 minutes—27% of which defined as low-acuity. Although most calls advising primary care were not followed by an ED attendance (93%), those seen in an ED generally attended later (median 102 minutes) with 23% defined as low-acuity. Younger age (<1) was a statistically significant predictor of low-acuity ED attendance following all call dispositions apart from home care. Conclusion More tailored options for unscheduled healthcare may be needed for younger children. Both early low-acuity attendance and late high-acuity attendance following contact with NHS 111 could act as useful entry points for clinical audits of the telephone triage service. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Researchers can request data extracts from the CUREd research database to be used in research studies focusing on urgent and emergency care within the UK. Researchers will need to go through an application process to obtain data and if successful, will only be supplied with data that does not contain patient identifiers.","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213619","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Although one objective of NHS 111 is to ease the strain on urgent and emergency care services, studies suggest the telephone triage service may be contributing to increased demand. Moreover, while parents and caregivers generally find NHS 111 satisfactory, concerns exist about its integration with the healthcare system and the appropriateness of advice. This study aimed to analyse the advice provided in NHS 111 calls, the duration between the call and ED attendance, and the outcomes of such attendances made by children and young people (C&YP). Methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out of C&YP (≤17) attending an ED in the Yorkshire and Humber region of the UK following contact with NHS 111 between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2017. This linked-data study examined NHS 111 calls and ED outcomes. Lognormal mixture distributions were fit to compare the time taken to attend ED following calls. Logistic mixed effects regression models were used to identify predictors of low-acuity NHS 111-related ED attendances. Results Our study of 348 401 NHS 111 calls found they were primarily concerning children aged 0–4 years. Overall, 13.1% of calls were followed by an ED attendance, with a median arrival time of 51 minutes. Of the 34 664 calls advising ED attendance 41% complied, arriving with a median of 38 minutes—27% of which defined as low-acuity. Although most calls advising primary care were not followed by an ED attendance (93%), those seen in an ED generally attended later (median 102 minutes) with 23% defined as low-acuity. Younger age (<1) was a statistically significant predictor of low-acuity ED attendance following all call dispositions apart from home care. Conclusion More tailored options for unscheduled healthcare may be needed for younger children. Both early low-acuity attendance and late high-acuity attendance following contact with NHS 111 could act as useful entry points for clinical audits of the telephone triage service. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Researchers can request data extracts from the CUREd research database to be used in research studies focusing on urgent and emergency care within the UK. Researchers will need to go through an application process to obtain data and if successful, will only be supplied with data that does not contain patient identifiers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电话分诊后儿童和青少年使用急诊室的情况:一项大型数据库研究
背景 尽管国家医疗服务系统111的目标之一是缓解紧急医疗服务的压力,但研究表明,电话分流服务可能会导致需求增加。此外,尽管家长和看护人普遍对NHS 111表示满意,但对其与医疗系统的整合以及建议的适当性仍存在担忧。本研究旨在分析 NHS 111 电话中提供的建议、电话与急诊室就诊之间的持续时间以及儿童和青少年(C&YP)就诊的结果。方法 对2016年4月1日至2017年3月31日期间在英国约克郡和亨伯地区拨打NHS 111后前往急诊室就诊的儿童和青少年(≤17岁)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。这项关联数据研究考察了 NHS 111 电话和急诊室结果。通过拟合对数正态混合分布来比较拨打电话后到急诊室就诊所花费的时间。使用逻辑混合效应回归模型来确定与 NHS 111 相关的低急症急诊室就诊率的预测因素。结果 我们对348 401次国家医疗服务体系111电话的研究发现,这些电话主要涉及0-4岁的儿童。总体而言,13.1%的呼叫随后被送往急诊室,中位到达时间为51分钟。在 34 664 个建议急诊室就诊的电话中,41% 的电话遵从了建议,到达时间中位数为 38 分钟,其中 27% 被定义为低危急值。虽然大多数建议基层医疗机构就诊的电话(93%)之后都没有去急诊室就诊,但在急诊室就诊的病人一般就诊时间较晚(中位数为 102 分钟),其中 23% 的病人被定义为低急性期。在除家庭护理外的所有呼叫处置中,年龄较小(小于 1 岁)是预测急诊室就诊率低的重要因素。结论 年龄较小的儿童可能需要更多量身定制的计划外医疗服务。与 NHS 111 联系后的早期低急性就诊率和晚期高急性就诊率均可作为电话分流服务临床审核的有用切入点。数据可能来自第三方,不对外公开。研究人员可请求从 CUREd 研究数据库中提取数据,用于以英国国内紧急和急诊护理为重点的研究。研究人员需要通过申请程序才能获得数据,如果申请成功,只能获得不包含患者身份识别信息的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Conservative management of traumatic haemothoraces: a UK single-centre trauma unit retrospective audit. Emerging technology solutions to support national emergency workforce capacity-building initiatives: lessons from Ugandan policy and practice. Objective capillary refill to rapidly detect haemorrhage at the bedside. Olanzapine postinjection delirium/sedation syndrome after long-acting olanzapine depot injection presenting to the emergency department: practical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Best evidence topic report: are portable handheld fundus cameras effective in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in emergency settings?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1