The efficacy of mifepristone-misoprostol regimen versus misoprostol-only for medication abortion at 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks’ gestation

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07737-2
Or Touval, Avital Ellert, Yair Daykan, Ron Schonman, Zvi Klein, Yael Yagur
{"title":"The efficacy of mifepristone-misoprostol regimen versus misoprostol-only for medication abortion at 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks’ gestation","authors":"Or Touval, Avital Ellert, Yair Daykan, Ron Schonman, Zvi Klein, Yael Yagur","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07737-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to compare duration of medication abortion after pretreatment with mifepristone versus misoprostol-only regimens at 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted for medication abortion from 2014 to 2022. Patients underwent feticide due to genetic or anatomical abnormalities at gestational age of 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks. Excluded from this study were patients admitted at gestational age &lt; 22 + 0/7 or &gt; 30 + 0/7 weeks, with multiple gestation, with diagnosis of intrauterine fetal demise before feticide, with contraindication for vaginal delivery, and who were administered a medical regimen other than the mifepristone-misoprostol or misoprostol-only protocol. Information collected included patients’ demographics, clinical outcomes, additional procedural interventions, and complications. Data of patients treated with mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-only were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The study group included 46 patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group and 35 in the misoprostol-only group. Median interval from first dose of misoprostol to fetal expulsion was shorter in the mifepristone-misoprostol group (10.6 vs. 15.3 h; <i>p</i> = 0.007) with shorter duration of hospitalization (3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.1 ± 1.2 days; <i>p</i> = 0.013). Study groups did not differ in terms of complications. Patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group had a younger gestational age (23.8 ± 1.69 vs. 25.37 ± 2.4 weeks; <i>p</i> = 0.002). However, multivariable Cox regression found that mifepristone was independently associated with shorter abortion time (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.03–2.9, <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Medication abortion with mifepristone-misoprostol was associated with shorter time to fetal expulsion at gestational ages 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks, compared with misoprostol-only regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07737-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare duration of medication abortion after pretreatment with mifepristone versus misoprostol-only regimens at 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted for medication abortion from 2014 to 2022. Patients underwent feticide due to genetic or anatomical abnormalities at gestational age of 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks. Excluded from this study were patients admitted at gestational age < 22 + 0/7 or > 30 + 0/7 weeks, with multiple gestation, with diagnosis of intrauterine fetal demise before feticide, with contraindication for vaginal delivery, and who were administered a medical regimen other than the mifepristone-misoprostol or misoprostol-only protocol. Information collected included patients’ demographics, clinical outcomes, additional procedural interventions, and complications. Data of patients treated with mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-only were compared.

Results

The study group included 46 patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group and 35 in the misoprostol-only group. Median interval from first dose of misoprostol to fetal expulsion was shorter in the mifepristone-misoprostol group (10.6 vs. 15.3 h; p = 0.007) with shorter duration of hospitalization (3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.1 ± 1.2 days; p = 0.013). Study groups did not differ in terms of complications. Patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group had a younger gestational age (23.8 ± 1.69 vs. 25.37 ± 2.4 weeks; p = 0.002). However, multivariable Cox regression found that mifepristone was independently associated with shorter abortion time (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.03–2.9, p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Medication abortion with mifepristone-misoprostol was associated with shorter time to fetal expulsion at gestational ages 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks, compared with misoprostol-only regimen.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米非司酮-米索前列醇方案与仅使用米索前列醇进行妊娠 22+0/7 至 30+0/7 周药物流产的疗效对比
目的本研究旨在比较在22 + 0/7周至30 + 0/7周使用米非司酮与仅使用米索前列醇方案预处理后药物流产的持续时间。方法这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年至2022年因药物流产入院的患者。患者因遗传或解剖异常在孕龄22 + 0/7周至30 + 0/7周时接受了堕胎手术。本研究排除了孕龄为22+0/7周或30+0/7周的患者、多胎妊娠患者、胎儿宫内死亡诊断患者、阴道分娩禁忌症患者以及使用米非司酮-米索前列醇或仅使用米索前列醇方案以外的药物方案的患者。收集的信息包括患者的人口统计学特征、临床结果、额外的程序干预和并发症。结果研究组包括米非司酮-米索前列醇组 46 例患者和纯米索前列醇组 35 例患者。米非司酮-米索前列醇组从首次服用米索前列醇到胎儿排出的中位时间间隔较短(10.6 小时对 15.3 小时;P = 0.007),住院时间较短(3.5 ± 1.1 天对 4.1 ± 1.2 天;P = 0.013)。研究组在并发症方面没有差异。米非司酮-米索前列醇组患者的孕周较小(23.8 ± 1.69 对 25.37 ± 2.4 周;p = 0.002)。结论与仅使用米索前列醇的方案相比,使用米非司酮-米索前列醇进行药物流产与孕龄 22+0/7 周至 30+0/7 周的胎儿排出时间较短有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
Real-world data of perioperative complications in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study. High-altitude hypoxia exposure alters follicular metabolome and oocyte developmental potential in women. Evaluation of the clinical utility of NIPT-plus and analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Comparison of the complications rate of different suture-passing techniques at the time of sacrospinous ligament fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paracetamol versus ibuprofen for early postpartum pain control: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1