Deep Learning Models for Predicting the Nugent Score to Diagnose Bacterial Vaginosis

Naoki Watanabe, Tomohisa Watari, Kenji Akamatsu, Isao Miyatsuka, Yoshihito Otsuka
{"title":"Deep Learning Models for Predicting the Nugent Score to Diagnose Bacterial Vaginosis","authors":"Naoki Watanabe, Tomohisa Watari, Kenji Akamatsu, Isao Miyatsuka, Yoshihito Otsuka","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.16.24313614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Nugent score is a commonly used tool for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis; however, its accuracy depends on the skills of laboratory technicians. We aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning models in predicting the Nugent score, with the goal of improving diagnostic consistency and accuracy. A total of 1,510 vaginal images collected from a hospital in Japan between 2021 and 2023 were assessed. Each image was annotated by laboratory technicians into one of four categories based on the Nugent—scorenormal vaginal flora, absence of vaginal flora, altered vaginal flora, or bacterial vaginosis. Deep learning models were developed to predict these categories, and their performance was evaluated by comparing the predicted scores with technician annotations. A high magnification model was further optimized and evaluated using an independent test set of 106 images to assess its performance relative to that of the technicians. The deep learning models demonstrated an accuracy of 84% at low magnification and 89% at high magnification in predicting the Nugent score categories. After optimization, the high magnification model achieved 94% accuracy, surpassing the average 92% accuracy of the technicians. The agreement between deep learning model predictions and technician annotations was 92% for normal vaginal flora, 100% for absence of vaginal flora, 91% for altered vaginal flora, and 100% for bacterial vaginosis. The deep learning models demonstrated accuracy comparable to that of laboratory technicians, which indicates their potential utility in improving the diagnostic accuracy of bacterial vaginosis.","PeriodicalId":501509,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Nugent score is a commonly used tool for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis; however, its accuracy depends on the skills of laboratory technicians. We aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning models in predicting the Nugent score, with the goal of improving diagnostic consistency and accuracy. A total of 1,510 vaginal images collected from a hospital in Japan between 2021 and 2023 were assessed. Each image was annotated by laboratory technicians into one of four categories based on the Nugent—scorenormal vaginal flora, absence of vaginal flora, altered vaginal flora, or bacterial vaginosis. Deep learning models were developed to predict these categories, and their performance was evaluated by comparing the predicted scores with technician annotations. A high magnification model was further optimized and evaluated using an independent test set of 106 images to assess its performance relative to that of the technicians. The deep learning models demonstrated an accuracy of 84% at low magnification and 89% at high magnification in predicting the Nugent score categories. After optimization, the high magnification model achieved 94% accuracy, surpassing the average 92% accuracy of the technicians. The agreement between deep learning model predictions and technician annotations was 92% for normal vaginal flora, 100% for absence of vaginal flora, 91% for altered vaginal flora, and 100% for bacterial vaginosis. The deep learning models demonstrated accuracy comparable to that of laboratory technicians, which indicates their potential utility in improving the diagnostic accuracy of bacterial vaginosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于预测 Nugent 评分以诊断细菌性阴道病的深度学习模型
Nugent 评分是诊断细菌性阴道病的常用工具,但其准确性取决于实验室技术人员的技能。我们旨在评估深度学习模型在预测 Nugent 评分方面的性能,目的是提高诊断的一致性和准确性。我们对 2021 年至 2023 年期间从日本一家医院收集的 1510 张阴道图像进行了评估。实验室技术人员根据 Nugent 评分将每张图像分为阴道正常菌群、无阴道菌群、阴道菌群改变或细菌性阴道病四个类别。我们开发了深度学习模型来预测这些类别,并通过比较预测分数和技术人员的注释来评估其性能。对高倍率模型进行了进一步优化,并使用 106 张图像的独立测试集对其进行了评估,以评估其相对于技术人员的性能。在预测 Nugent 评分类别方面,深度学习模型在低倍放大时的准确率为 84%,在高倍放大时的准确率为 89%。经过优化后,高倍率模型的准确率达到 94%,超过了技术人员平均 92% 的准确率。在阴道正常菌群方面,深度学习模型预测与技术人员注释的一致性为 92%;在阴道无菌群方面,一致性为 100%;在阴道菌群改变方面,一致性为 91%;在细菌性阴道病方面,一致性为 100%。深度学习模型的准确性与实验室技术人员的准确性相当,这表明它们在提高细菌性阴道病诊断准确性方面具有潜在的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reactogenicity and immunogenicity against MPXV of the intradermal administration of Modified V Vaccinia Ankara compared to the standard subcutaneous route. A next generation CRISPR diagnostic tool to survey drug resistance in Human African Trypanosomiasis. Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia as a novel automated surveillance indicator: results from four European university hospitals Integration of Group A Streptococcus Rapid Tests with the Open Fluidic CandyCollect Device Deep Learning Models for Predicting the Nugent Score to Diagnose Bacterial Vaginosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1