Comparative Effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis Using GRADE

Xuan Wang, Ankit Pahwa, Mary T. Bausch-Jurken, Anushri Chitkara, Pawana Sharma, Mia Malmenas, Sonam Vats, Michael Gordon Whitfield, Kira Zhi Hua Lai, Priyadarsini Dasari, Ritu Gupta, Maria Nassim, Nicolas Van de Velde, Nathan Green, Ekkehard Beck
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis Using GRADE","authors":"Xuan Wang, Ankit Pahwa, Mary T. Bausch-Jurken, Anushri Chitkara, Pawana Sharma, Mia Malmenas, Sonam Vats, Michael Gordon Whitfield, Kira Zhi Hua Lai, Priyadarsini Dasari, Ritu Gupta, Maria Nassim, Nicolas Van de Velde, Nathan Green, Ekkehard Beck","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.24313632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This systematic literature review and pairwise meta-analysis evaluated the comparative effectiveness of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b in patients with at least one underlying medical condition at high risk for severe COVID-19. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles from January 1, 2019 to February 9, 2024. Studies reporting effectiveness data from at least two doses of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccination in adults with medical conditions at high risk of developing severe COVID-19 according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were included. Outcomes of interest were SARS-CoV-2 infection (overall, symptomatic, and severe), hospitalization due to COVID-19, and death due to COVID-19. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with random effects models. Subgroup analyses by specific medical conditions, number of vaccinations, age, and SARS-CoV-2 variant were conducted. Heterogeneity between studies was estimated with chi-square testing. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development, and Evaluations framework. Results: Sixty-five observational studies capturing the original/ancestral-containing primary series to Omicron-containing bivalent original-BA4-5 vaccinations were included in the meta-analysis. mRNA-1273 was associated with significantly lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.79-0.92]; I2=92.5%), symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65-0.86]; I2=62.3%), severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.89]; I2=38.0%), hospitalization due to COVID-19 (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.94]; I2=38.7%), and death due to COVID-19 (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.76-0.93]; I2=1.3%) than BNT162b2. Findings were generally consistent across subgroups. Evidence certainty was low or very low because sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials are impractical in this heterogeneous population. Conclusion: Meta-analysis of 65 observational studies showed that vaccination with mRNA-1273 was associated with a significantly lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization and death than BNT162b2 in patients with medical conditions at high risk of severe COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":501509,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24313632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic literature review and pairwise meta-analysis evaluated the comparative effectiveness of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b in patients with at least one underlying medical condition at high risk for severe COVID-19. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles from January 1, 2019 to February 9, 2024. Studies reporting effectiveness data from at least two doses of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccination in adults with medical conditions at high risk of developing severe COVID-19 according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were included. Outcomes of interest were SARS-CoV-2 infection (overall, symptomatic, and severe), hospitalization due to COVID-19, and death due to COVID-19. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with random effects models. Subgroup analyses by specific medical conditions, number of vaccinations, age, and SARS-CoV-2 variant were conducted. Heterogeneity between studies was estimated with chi-square testing. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development, and Evaluations framework. Results: Sixty-five observational studies capturing the original/ancestral-containing primary series to Omicron-containing bivalent original-BA4-5 vaccinations were included in the meta-analysis. mRNA-1273 was associated with significantly lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.79-0.92]; I2=92.5%), symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65-0.86]; I2=62.3%), severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.89]; I2=38.0%), hospitalization due to COVID-19 (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.94]; I2=38.7%), and death due to COVID-19 (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.76-0.93]; I2=1.3%) than BNT162b2. Findings were generally consistent across subgroups. Evidence certainty was low or very low because sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials are impractical in this heterogeneous population. Conclusion: Meta-analysis of 65 observational studies showed that vaccination with mRNA-1273 was associated with a significantly lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization and death than BNT162b2 in patients with medical conditions at high risk of severe COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
mRNA-1273 和 BNT162b2 COVID-19 疫苗在有基础疾病的成人中的效果比较:使用 GRADE 进行系统文献综述和配对荟萃分析
简介:这项系统性文献综述和配对荟萃分析评估了 mRNA-1273 与 BNT162b 对至少患有一种基础疾病的重度 COVID-19 高危患者的疗效比较。研究方法检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库中2019年1月1日至2024年2月9日的相关文章。纳入的研究报告了根据美国疾病控制和预防中心(US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)的标准,对患有严重 COVID-19 高风险疾病的成人接种至少两剂 mRNA-1273 和 BNT162b2 疫苗的有效性数据。研究结果包括 SARS-CoV-2 感染(总体感染、无症状感染和严重感染)、COVID-19 导致的住院治疗以及 COVID-19 导致的死亡。采用随机效应模型计算风险比(RRs)。根据特定的医疗条件、疫苗接种次数、年龄和 SARS-CoV-2 变体进行了分组分析。研究之间的异质性通过卡方检验进行估计。证据的确定性采用 "建议、评估、发展和评价分级 "框架进行评估。结果:荟萃分析纳入了 65 项观察性研究,这些研究从含原始/胰岛素的初级系列疫苗到含 Omicron 的二价原始-BA4-5 疫苗。mRNA-1273 与较低的 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险显著相关(RR,0.85 [95% CI,0.79-0.92];I2=92。5%)、无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染(RR,0.75 [95% CI,0.65-0.86];I2=62.3%)、严重 SARS-CoV-2 感染(RR,0.83 [95% CI,0.78-0.89];I2=38.0%)、COVID-19 导致的住院(RR,0.88 [95% CI,0.82-0.94];I2=38.7%)和 COVID-19 导致的死亡(RR,0.84 [95% CI,0.76-0.93];I2=1.3%)均高于 BNT162b2。不同亚组的研究结果基本一致。证据的确定性较低或很低,因为在这一异质性人群中进行有充分证据支持的随机对照试验是不切实际的。结论对 65 项观察性研究进行的 Meta 分析表明,与 BNT162b2 相比,接种 mRNA-1273 疫苗可显著降低严重 COVID-19 高危患者感染 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 相关住院及死亡的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reactogenicity and immunogenicity against MPXV of the intradermal administration of Modified V Vaccinia Ankara compared to the standard subcutaneous route. A next generation CRISPR diagnostic tool to survey drug resistance in Human African Trypanosomiasis. Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia as a novel automated surveillance indicator: results from four European university hospitals Integration of Group A Streptococcus Rapid Tests with the Open Fluidic CandyCollect Device Deep Learning Models for Predicting the Nugent Score to Diagnose Bacterial Vaginosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1