Are social media robot influencers credible? A cross-continental analysis in a fashion context

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108447
Patricia Baudier, Elodie de Boissieu
{"title":"Are social media robot influencers credible? A cross-continental analysis in a fashion context","authors":"Patricia Baudier,&nbsp;Elodie de Boissieu","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has given us social robots that interact with us in everyday life. As chatbots, they are sometimes the first point of entry for contacting a brand. Trends have emerged with human-like social media robot influencers (SMRs) promoting products and services. The literature on this subject is incomplete, so this study aims to mobilize source credibility theory to analyze the influence of individuals’ perceptions of SMRs on attitudes toward their use. The influence of anthropomorphism on attitude is investigated, and the relationship is analyzed between attitudes on purchase intention for products promoted by both SMRs and e-word-of-mouth. Finally, the impact of gender and native continent as moderators is controlled. Using a quantitative method, a survey based on existing scales was scripted, and a total sample of 300 digital natives (born after 1980) was collected worldwide. The results were analyzed using the partial least approach and SmartPLS4 software. Our findings reveal the importance of trustworthiness, expertise, physical attractiveness, content attractiveness, and anthropomorphic appearance. However, similarities between influencers and followers have no impact on attitudes toward the use of SMRs. Finally, the theory of source credibility is shown to be enriched by anthropomorphism, and the moderating effect of gender and native continent is demonstrated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108447"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224003157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has given us social robots that interact with us in everyday life. As chatbots, they are sometimes the first point of entry for contacting a brand. Trends have emerged with human-like social media robot influencers (SMRs) promoting products and services. The literature on this subject is incomplete, so this study aims to mobilize source credibility theory to analyze the influence of individuals’ perceptions of SMRs on attitudes toward their use. The influence of anthropomorphism on attitude is investigated, and the relationship is analyzed between attitudes on purchase intention for products promoted by both SMRs and e-word-of-mouth. Finally, the impact of gender and native continent as moderators is controlled. Using a quantitative method, a survey based on existing scales was scripted, and a total sample of 300 digital natives (born after 1980) was collected worldwide. The results were analyzed using the partial least approach and SmartPLS4 software. Our findings reveal the importance of trustworthiness, expertise, physical attractiveness, content attractiveness, and anthropomorphic appearance. However, similarities between influencers and followers have no impact on attitudes toward the use of SMRs. Finally, the theory of source credibility is shown to be enriched by anthropomorphism, and the moderating effect of gender and native continent is demonstrated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体机器人影响者可信吗?时尚背景下的跨洲分析
人工智能(AI)为我们带来了在日常生活中与我们互动的社交机器人。作为聊天机器人,它们有时是联系品牌的第一入口。类似人类的社交媒体机器人影响者(SMR)推广产品和服务的趋势已经出现。这方面的文献尚不完整,因此本研究旨在利用来源可信度理论来分析个人对 SMR 的看法对其使用态度的影响。研究了拟人化对态度的影响,并分析了对 SMR 和电子口碑推广产品的态度与购买意向之间的关系。最后,对性别和本土大陆作为调节因素的影响进行了控制。研究采用定量方法,在现有量表的基础上编写了一份调查问卷,在全球范围内收集了 300 个数字原住民(1980 年后出生)样本。我们使用偏最小法和 SmartPLS4 软件对调查结果进行了分析。我们的研究结果揭示了可信度、专业知识、外貌吸引力、内容吸引力和拟人化外观的重要性。然而,影响者和追随者之间的相似性对使用 SMR 的态度没有影响。最后,拟人化丰富了来源可信度理论,并证明了性别和本土大陆的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
What makes an app authentic? Determining antecedents of perceived authenticity in an AI-powered service app The effects of self-explanation on game-based learning: Evidence from eye-tracking analyses Avatars at risk: Exploring public response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces Perception of non-binary social media users towards authentic non-binary social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1