Machine learning reveals heterogeneous associations between environmental factors and cardiometabolic diseases across polygenic risk scores

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Communications medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00596-7
Tatsuhiko Naito, Kosuke Inoue, Shinichi Namba, Kyuto Sonehara, Ken Suzuki, BioBank Japan, Koichi Matsuda, Naoki Kondo, Tatsushi Toda, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Takashi Kadowaki, Yukinori Okada
{"title":"Machine learning reveals heterogeneous associations between environmental factors and cardiometabolic diseases across polygenic risk scores","authors":"Tatsuhiko Naito, Kosuke Inoue, Shinichi Namba, Kyuto Sonehara, Ken Suzuki, BioBank Japan, Koichi Matsuda, Naoki Kondo, Tatsushi Toda, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Takashi Kadowaki, Yukinori Okada","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00596-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are expected to be helpful in precision medicine, it remains unclear whether high-PRS groups are more likely to benefit from preventive interventions for diseases. Recent methodological advancements enable us to predict treatment effects at the individual level. We employed causal forest to explore the relationship between PRSs and individual risk of diseases associated with certain environmental factors. Following simulations illustrating its performance, we applied our approach to investigate the individual risk of cardiometabolic diseases, including coronary artery diseases (CAD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), associated with obesity and smoking among individuals from UK Biobank (UKB; n = 369,942) and BioBank Japan (BBJ; n = 149,421). Here we find the heterogeneous association of obesity and smoking with diseases across PRS values, complicated by the multi-dimensional combination of individual characteristics such as age and sex. The highest positive correlations of PRSs and the exposure-related disease risks are observed between obesity and T2D in UKB and between smoking and CAD in BBJ (Spearman’s ρ = 0.61 and 0.32, respectively). However, most relationships are weak or negative, suggesting that high-PRS groups will not necessarily benefit most from environmental factor prevention. Our study highlights the importance of individual-level prediction of disease risks associated with target exposure in precision medicine. This study aimed to understand if people with a high genetic risk for certain diseases benefit more from preventive strategies. Using a machine-learning-based method, we analyzed data from large groups of people in the UK and Japan. We examined the risk of heart and metabolic diseases in relation to obesity and smoking. The results showed that the link between genetic risk and disease is complex and varies widely among individuals. Our results suggested that those with a high genetic risk for disease may not always benefit more from the prevention of obesity and smoking. This finding suggests that we need to consider more than risk in decisions on how to prevent diseases in individuals. Naito and Inoue, et al. apply machine learning to reveal heterogeneous associations between environmental factors and diseases across polygenic risk scores. Focusing on cardiometabolic diseases shows that those with high genetic disease susceptibility may not necessarily benefit the most from the reduction of corresponding disease risk factors.","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00596-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00596-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are expected to be helpful in precision medicine, it remains unclear whether high-PRS groups are more likely to benefit from preventive interventions for diseases. Recent methodological advancements enable us to predict treatment effects at the individual level. We employed causal forest to explore the relationship between PRSs and individual risk of diseases associated with certain environmental factors. Following simulations illustrating its performance, we applied our approach to investigate the individual risk of cardiometabolic diseases, including coronary artery diseases (CAD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), associated with obesity and smoking among individuals from UK Biobank (UKB; n = 369,942) and BioBank Japan (BBJ; n = 149,421). Here we find the heterogeneous association of obesity and smoking with diseases across PRS values, complicated by the multi-dimensional combination of individual characteristics such as age and sex. The highest positive correlations of PRSs and the exposure-related disease risks are observed between obesity and T2D in UKB and between smoking and CAD in BBJ (Spearman’s ρ = 0.61 and 0.32, respectively). However, most relationships are weak or negative, suggesting that high-PRS groups will not necessarily benefit most from environmental factor prevention. Our study highlights the importance of individual-level prediction of disease risks associated with target exposure in precision medicine. This study aimed to understand if people with a high genetic risk for certain diseases benefit more from preventive strategies. Using a machine-learning-based method, we analyzed data from large groups of people in the UK and Japan. We examined the risk of heart and metabolic diseases in relation to obesity and smoking. The results showed that the link between genetic risk and disease is complex and varies widely among individuals. Our results suggested that those with a high genetic risk for disease may not always benefit more from the prevention of obesity and smoking. This finding suggests that we need to consider more than risk in decisions on how to prevent diseases in individuals. Naito and Inoue, et al. apply machine learning to reveal heterogeneous associations between environmental factors and diseases across polygenic risk scores. Focusing on cardiometabolic diseases shows that those with high genetic disease susceptibility may not necessarily benefit the most from the reduction of corresponding disease risk factors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习揭示了多基因风险评分中环境因素与心脏代谢疾病之间的异质性关联
尽管多基因风险评分(PRS)有望对精准医疗有所帮助,但目前仍不清楚高PRS群体是否更有可能从疾病预防干预中获益。最近方法学的进步使我们能够在个体水平上预测治疗效果。我们采用因果森林来探索 PRS 与某些环境因素相关疾病的个体风险之间的关系。在模拟说明其性能之后,我们应用我们的方法调查了英国生物库(UKB;n = 369,942 人)和日本生物库(BBJ;n = 149,421 人)中与肥胖和吸烟相关的心血管代谢疾病(包括冠状动脉疾病 (CAD) 和 2 型糖尿病 (T2D))的个体风险。在这里,我们发现肥胖和吸烟与不同 PRS 值的疾病之间存在异质性关联,而年龄和性别等个体特征的多维组合又使这种关联变得复杂。PRSs与暴露相关疾病风险的最高正相关关系出现在UKB的肥胖与T2D之间,以及BBJ的吸烟与CAD之间(Spearman's ρ = 0.61和0.32)。然而,大多数关系都很弱或呈负相关,这表明高PRS群体并不一定能从环境因素预防中获益最多。我们的研究凸显了在精准医疗中对与目标暴露相关的疾病风险进行个体水平预测的重要性。这项研究旨在了解某些疾病的高遗传风险人群是否能从预防策略中获益更多。我们使用基于机器学习的方法,分析了来自英国和日本大型人群的数据。我们研究了与肥胖和吸烟有关的心脏和代谢疾病风险。结果显示,遗传风险与疾病之间的联系非常复杂,而且个体差异很大。我们的研究结果表明,遗传风险高的人不一定能从预防肥胖和吸烟中获益更多。这一发现表明,在决定如何预防个人疾病时,我们需要考虑的不仅仅是风险。Naito 和 Inoue 等人应用机器学习揭示了环境因素与多基因风险评分中疾病之间的异质性关联。以心脏代谢疾病为重点的研究表明,遗传疾病易感性高的人并不一定从减少相应的疾病风险因素中获益最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Correction: A cross-sectional and population-based study from primary care on post-COVID-19 conditions in non-hospitalized patients An integrated empirical and computational study to decipher help-seeking behaviors and vocal stigma Survey of the risk behaviors and mental health of adolescents in Gabon risky behaviors and vulnerability of adolescent Africans Inclusiveness of the All of Us Research Program improves polygenic risk scores and fosters genomic medicine for all Recommendations for the equitable integration of digital health interventions across the HIV care cascade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1