Antibiotic bone cement combined with vacuum sealing drainage effectively repairs sacrococcygeal pressure ulcer.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/RYCD5610
Yanping Du, Yanan Yu, Shaona Xu, Jie Yang, Ying Liu, Yu Tang, Cuiying Chu
{"title":"Antibiotic bone cement combined with vacuum sealing drainage effectively repairs sacrococcygeal pressure ulcer.","authors":"Yanping Du, Yanan Yu, Shaona Xu, Jie Yang, Ying Liu, Yu Tang, Cuiying Chu","doi":"10.62347/RYCD5610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of antibiotic bone cement combined with the vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technique for repairing sacrococcygeal pressure ulcer wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 136 patients treated at Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College between May 2020 and June 2022. The cases were devided into a control group and a study group according to their treatment regimen. Indicators of postoperative recovery including blood routine recovery time, hospital stay, antibiotic application time, and healing time were compared between the two groups. Before the procedure and 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours following the operation, the pain levels of patients in both groups were examined using a visual analogue scale (VAS). On the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days of treatment, the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH) was used to measure the pressure ulcer area between the two groups. On the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days following treatment, the capillary density values were compared between the two groups, along with the levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and c-reactive protein (CRP). The proportions of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell subsets, as well as CD4+/CD8+ ratio, were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The blood routine recovery time, hospital stays, antibiotic usage duration, and healing time were all significantly shorter in the study group compared to those in the control group (all <i>P</i><0.05). At 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h following surgery, the VAS score in study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). The study group also showed a greater reduction in pressure ulcer area, with lower PUSH scores observed on days 14, 21, and 28 (<i>P</i><0.05). Post-treatment levels of IL-1β, IL-12, and CRP decreased in both groups, with significantly lower levels in the study group (<i>P</i><0.05). Following therapy, both groups demonstrated significantly increased levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, IgM and IgG and reduced level of CD8+. These improvements were more pronounced in the study group (all <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of antibiotic bone cement and VSD is effective in enhancing recovery, reducing pain and inflammation, and improving immune response in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pressure ulcers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/RYCD5610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of antibiotic bone cement combined with the vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technique for repairing sacrococcygeal pressure ulcer wounds.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 136 patients treated at Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College between May 2020 and June 2022. The cases were devided into a control group and a study group according to their treatment regimen. Indicators of postoperative recovery including blood routine recovery time, hospital stay, antibiotic application time, and healing time were compared between the two groups. Before the procedure and 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours following the operation, the pain levels of patients in both groups were examined using a visual analogue scale (VAS). On the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days of treatment, the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH) was used to measure the pressure ulcer area between the two groups. On the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days following treatment, the capillary density values were compared between the two groups, along with the levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and c-reactive protein (CRP). The proportions of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell subsets, as well as CD4+/CD8+ ratio, were compared between the two groups.

Results: The blood routine recovery time, hospital stays, antibiotic usage duration, and healing time were all significantly shorter in the study group compared to those in the control group (all P<0.05). At 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h following surgery, the VAS score in study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The study group also showed a greater reduction in pressure ulcer area, with lower PUSH scores observed on days 14, 21, and 28 (P<0.05). Post-treatment levels of IL-1β, IL-12, and CRP decreased in both groups, with significantly lower levels in the study group (P<0.05). Following therapy, both groups demonstrated significantly increased levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, IgM and IgG and reduced level of CD8+. These improvements were more pronounced in the study group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of antibiotic bone cement and VSD is effective in enhancing recovery, reducing pain and inflammation, and improving immune response in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pressure ulcers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素骨水泥结合真空密封引流可有效修复骶尾部压疮。
目的:研究抗生素骨水泥结合真空密封引流技术修复骶尾部压疮伤口的效果:研究抗生素骨水泥结合真空密封引流术(VSD)修复骶尾部压疮伤口的效果:方法:对2020年5月至2022年6月期间在滨州医学院烟台附属医院接受治疗的136例患者的数据进行回顾性分析。根据治疗方案将病例分为对照组和研究组。比较两组患者的术后恢复指标,包括血常规恢复时间、住院时间、抗生素应用时间和愈合时间。在手术前、手术后 6、12、24 和 48 小时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)检查两组患者的疼痛程度。在治疗的第 3 天、第 7 天、第 14 天、第 21 天和第 28 天,使用压疮愈合量表(PUSH)测量两组患者的压疮面积。在治疗后的第 7 天、第 14 天、第 21 天和第 28 天,比较两组的毛细血管密度值以及白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、白细胞介素-12(IL-12)和 c 反应蛋白(CRP)的水平。比较了两组患者的免疫球蛋白 M(IgM)和免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)水平、CD3+、CD4+和 CD8+ T 细胞亚群比例以及 CD4+/CD8+ 比值:结果:与对照组相比,研究组的血常规恢复时间、住院时间、抗生素使用时间和愈合时间均明显缩短(均为PPPPP结论:抗生素骨水泥联合治疗骨关节炎的疗效显著:抗生素骨水泥和 VSD 联合治疗骶尾部压疮可有效促进恢复、减轻疼痛和炎症反应,并改善免疫反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for improving prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Comparison of the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-containing dual-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer resistant to EGFR-TKIs. A dual analysis of bougie and stylet development trend and impact of Chinese regulations on medical devices innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1