Multimodal MRI-based radiomics models for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion of endometrial carcinoma.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01430-1
Dong Liu, Jinyu Huang, Yufeng Zhang, Hailin Shen, Ximing Wang, Zhou Huang, Xue Chen, Zhenguo Qiao, Chunhong Hu
{"title":"Multimodal MRI-based radiomics models for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion of endometrial carcinoma.","authors":"Dong Liu, Jinyu Huang, Yufeng Zhang, Hailin Shen, Ximing Wang, Zhou Huang, Xue Chen, Zhenguo Qiao, Chunhong Hu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01430-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the predictive capabilities of MRI-based radiomics for detecting lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma (EC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 160 female patients diagnosed with EC. The radiomics model including T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) images was established. Additionally, a conventional MRI model, which incorporated MRI-reported FIGO stage, deep myometrial infiltration (DMI), adnexal involvement, and vaginal/parametrial involvement, was established. Finally, a combined model was created by integrating the radiomics signature and conventional MRI characteristics. The predictive performance was validated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A stratified analysis was conducted to compare the differences between the three models by Delong test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In predicting LVSI, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical model in the training cohort (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.8862) but not in the test cohort (AUC: 0.812 vs. 0.8758). The combined model demonstrated superior performance in both the training and test cohorts (training cohort: AUC = 0.934, 95% CI: 0.8807-0.9873; testing cohort: AUC = 0.905, 95% CI: 0.7679-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined model exhibited utility in preoperatively predicting LVSI in patients with EC, offering potential benefits for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01430-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive capabilities of MRI-based radiomics for detecting lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma (EC).

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 160 female patients diagnosed with EC. The radiomics model including T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) images was established. Additionally, a conventional MRI model, which incorporated MRI-reported FIGO stage, deep myometrial infiltration (DMI), adnexal involvement, and vaginal/parametrial involvement, was established. Finally, a combined model was created by integrating the radiomics signature and conventional MRI characteristics. The predictive performance was validated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A stratified analysis was conducted to compare the differences between the three models by Delong test.

Results: In predicting LVSI, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical model in the training cohort (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.8862) but not in the test cohort (AUC: 0.812 vs. 0.8758). The combined model demonstrated superior performance in both the training and test cohorts (training cohort: AUC = 0.934, 95% CI: 0.8807-0.9873; testing cohort: AUC = 0.905, 95% CI: 0.7679-1).

Conclusions: The combined model exhibited utility in preoperatively predicting LVSI in patients with EC, offering potential benefits for clinical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多模态磁共振成像的放射组学模型用于子宫内膜癌淋巴管间隙侵犯的术前预测。
目的:评估基于核磁共振成像的放射组学检测子宫内膜癌(EC)患者淋巴管间隙侵犯(LVSI)的预测能力:对160名确诊为子宫内膜癌的女性患者进行回顾性分析。建立了包括 T2 加权和动态对比增强 MRI(DCE-MRI)图像在内的放射组学模型。此外,还建立了一个传统 MRI 模型,其中包括 MRI 报告的 FIGO 分期、子宫深部浸润(DMI)、附件受累和阴道/宫旁受累。最后,通过整合放射组学特征和传统磁共振成像特征,建立了一个综合模型。预测性能通过接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)的曲线下面积(AUC)进行验证。通过德隆检验进行分层分析,比较三种模型之间的差异:结果:在预测 LVSI 方面,放射组学模型在训练队列(AUC:0.899 vs. 0.8862)中优于临床模型,但在测试队列(AUC:0.812 vs. 0.8758)中则没有优于临床模型。综合模型在训练队列和测试队列中均表现出卓越的性能(训练队列:AUC = 0.934,95% CI:0.8807-0.9873;测试队列:AUC = 0.905,95% CI:0.7679-1):综合模型在EC患者术前预测LVSI方面表现出了实用性,为临床决策提供了潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Establishment of an MRI-based radiomics model for distinguishing between intramedullary spinal cord tumor and tumefactive demyelinating lesion. In vitro detection of cancer cells using a novel fluorescent choline derivative. Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer by a clinical-deep learning radiomics model : Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy patients. Prior information guided deep-learning model for tumor bed segmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy. The predictive value of nomogram for adnexal cystic-solid masses based on O-RADS US, clinical and laboratory indicators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1