A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Identify Causes of Sex Differences in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation Process.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000581
Ritah R Chumdermpadetsuk, Adriana Montalvan, Stalin Canizares, Bhavna Chopra, Martha Pavlakis, David D Lee, Devin E Eckhoff
{"title":"A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Identify Causes of Sex Differences in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation Process.","authors":"Ritah R Chumdermpadetsuk, Adriana Montalvan, Stalin Canizares, Bhavna Chopra, Martha Pavlakis, David D Lee, Devin E Eckhoff","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have shown that females are living donors for kidney transplantation at higher rates than males. However, the underlying reasons for this observation are not well-understood. We examined the living donor evaluation process to determine the point at which sex imbalance arises. Based on a previous study, we hypothesized that both sexes are equally likely to become approved as living donors, but females are more likely to follow through with donation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single institution retrospective chart review of self-referrals for living donor evaluation between 1/2009 - 12/2022. Self-referrals identified using the Organ Transplant Tracking Record database and cross referenced with billing data. Exclusion at each stage of evaluation was recorded and compared between sexes using log binomial regression; unadjusted and adjusted (for donor age, race, ethnicity, relationship to recipient, and recipient sex) risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,861 self-referrals were reviewed, including 1,214 (65.2%) females and 647 (34.8%) males, resulting in 146 approvals and 125 donations (76/125, 60.8% females, 49/125 39.2% males). Adjusted RRs indicated no significant differences between sexes in completing medical and/or psychosocial workup, having medical and/or psychosocial contraindications, being approved for donation, and proceeding with donation. The top medical contraindications for both sexes were obesity, hypertension, and nephrolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female overrepresentation among living donors is likely due to the 1.9 times higher rate of self-referral for evaluation. After this point, both sexes were equally likely to complete workup, be approved, and follow through with donation. Increased efforts to engage males at the initial self-referral stage has the potential to expand access to living donor kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have shown that females are living donors for kidney transplantation at higher rates than males. However, the underlying reasons for this observation are not well-understood. We examined the living donor evaluation process to determine the point at which sex imbalance arises. Based on a previous study, we hypothesized that both sexes are equally likely to become approved as living donors, but females are more likely to follow through with donation.

Methods: Single institution retrospective chart review of self-referrals for living donor evaluation between 1/2009 - 12/2022. Self-referrals identified using the Organ Transplant Tracking Record database and cross referenced with billing data. Exclusion at each stage of evaluation was recorded and compared between sexes using log binomial regression; unadjusted and adjusted (for donor age, race, ethnicity, relationship to recipient, and recipient sex) risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined.

Results: 1,861 self-referrals were reviewed, including 1,214 (65.2%) females and 647 (34.8%) males, resulting in 146 approvals and 125 donations (76/125, 60.8% females, 49/125 39.2% males). Adjusted RRs indicated no significant differences between sexes in completing medical and/or psychosocial workup, having medical and/or psychosocial contraindications, being approved for donation, and proceeding with donation. The top medical contraindications for both sexes were obesity, hypertension, and nephrolithiasis.

Conclusion: Female overrepresentation among living donors is likely due to the 1.9 times higher rate of self-referral for evaluation. After this point, both sexes were equally likely to complete workup, be approved, and follow through with donation. Increased efforts to engage males at the initial self-referral stage has the potential to expand access to living donor kidney transplantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Association of Heart Failure and Edema Events between Patients Initiating SZC or Patiromer. Changes in 24-hour Urine Chemistry in Patients with Nephrolithiasis during Weight Loss with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Based Therapies. A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Identify Causes of Sex Differences in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation Process. Renal Disease and Kidney Transplantation in Hispanic American Persons. Global Perspective of Acute Kidney Injury: Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1