Incorporating sources of correlation between outcomes: An introduction to mixed models.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1177/00236772241259518
Limeng Liu, Ashley Petersen
{"title":"Incorporating sources of correlation between outcomes: An introduction to mixed models.","authors":"Limeng Liu, Ashley Petersen","doi":"10.1177/00236772241259518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal research often involves measuring the outcomes of interest multiple times on the same animal, whether over time or for different exposures. These repeated outcomes measured on the same animal are correlated due to animal-specific characteristics. While this repeated measures data can address more complex research questions than single-outcome data, the statistical analysis must take into account the study design resulting in correlated outcomes, which violate the independence assumption of standard statistical methods (e.g. a two-sample <i>t</i>-test, linear regression). When standard statistical methods are incorrectly used to analyze correlated outcome data, the statistical inference (i.e. confidence intervals and <i>p</i>-values) will be incorrect, with some settings leading to null findings too often and others producing statistically significant findings despite no support for this in the data. Instead, researchers can leverage approaches designed specifically for correlated outcomes. In this article, we discuss common study designs that lead to correlated outcome data, motivate the intuition about the impact of improperly analyzing correlated outcomes using methods for independent data, and introduce approaches that properly leverage correlated outcome data.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"463-469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241259518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal research often involves measuring the outcomes of interest multiple times on the same animal, whether over time or for different exposures. These repeated outcomes measured on the same animal are correlated due to animal-specific characteristics. While this repeated measures data can address more complex research questions than single-outcome data, the statistical analysis must take into account the study design resulting in correlated outcomes, which violate the independence assumption of standard statistical methods (e.g. a two-sample t-test, linear regression). When standard statistical methods are incorrectly used to analyze correlated outcome data, the statistical inference (i.e. confidence intervals and p-values) will be incorrect, with some settings leading to null findings too often and others producing statistically significant findings despite no support for this in the data. Instead, researchers can leverage approaches designed specifically for correlated outcomes. In this article, we discuss common study designs that lead to correlated outcome data, motivate the intuition about the impact of improperly analyzing correlated outcomes using methods for independent data, and introduce approaches that properly leverage correlated outcome data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳入结果之间的相关性来源:混合模型简介。
动物研究通常涉及在同一动物身上多次测量感兴趣的结果,无论是随时间推移还是针对不同的暴露。由于动物的特异性,在同一动物身上重复测量的结果具有相关性。虽然与单一结果数据相比,重复测量数据可以解决更复杂的研究问题,但统计分析必须考虑到研究设计导致的相关结果,这违反了标准统计方法(如双样本 t 检验、线性回归)的独立性假设。如果不正确地使用标准统计方法来分析相关结果数据,统计推断(即置信区间和 p 值)将是不正确的,有些设置往往会导致无效结果,而有些设置则会产生具有统计意义的结果,尽管数据中并不支持这种结果。相反,研究人员可以利用专为相关结果设计的方法。在本文中,我们将讨论导致相关结果数据的常见研究设计,激发对使用独立数据方法不当分析相关结果的影响的直觉,并介绍正确利用相关结果数据的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory, hemodynamic, and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in sheep. Management of zoonoses in research institutions - lessons learned from a Coxiella burnetii outbreak case. An innovative approach for health and safety training and occupational health program annual enrollment for laboratory animal care and use personnel. Extended oxygen supplementation after thoracotomy in rats may improve welfare. Animal researchers' views on the publication of negative results and subsequent policy adoptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1