Michele Coelho Vicente, Mariana Bucci Sanches, Jeferson Castelani Fabri, Gilmar Faustino da Cunha, Leonardo de Souza Carvalho, Vilanice Alves de Araujo Püschel
{"title":"Gastrostomy management by the nursing team in a hospital in São Paulo, Brazil: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Michele Coelho Vicente, Mariana Bucci Sanches, Jeferson Castelani Fabri, Gilmar Faustino da Cunha, Leonardo de Souza Carvalho, Vilanice Alves de Araujo Püschel","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficient and effective management of gastrostomy patients should be based on best practices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project aimed to improve gastrostomy management in a semi-intensive care unit of a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. The JBI approach to evidence implementation is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit strategy. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices against recommended best practices. Feedback from the audit was used to identify barriers and design implement strategies to improve practice. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline audit involved an evaluation of 33 nurses and 90 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit evaluated 37 nurses and 80 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit revealed that compliance increased to 90% for three of the eight criteria. For the remainder, it varied between 20% and 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The baseline audit and feedback strategy led to improved compliance in five of the eight criteria. Future audits will be necessary to maintain these results.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A259.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The efficient and effective management of gastrostomy patients should be based on best practices.
Objective: This project aimed to improve gastrostomy management in a semi-intensive care unit of a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.
Methods: This study followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. The JBI approach to evidence implementation is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit strategy. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices against recommended best practices. Feedback from the audit was used to identify barriers and design implement strategies to improve practice. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.
Results: The baseline audit involved an evaluation of 33 nurses and 90 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit evaluated 37 nurses and 80 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit revealed that compliance increased to 90% for three of the eight criteria. For the remainder, it varied between 20% and 50%.
Conclusion: The baseline audit and feedback strategy led to improved compliance in five of the eight criteria. Future audits will be necessary to maintain these results.