Management of Central Poststroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104666
Arnas Tamasauskas , Barbara Silva-Passadouro , Nicholas Fallon , Bernhard Frank , Svajune Laurinaviciute , Simon Keller , Andrew Marshall
{"title":"Management of Central Poststroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Arnas Tamasauskas ,&nbsp;Barbara Silva-Passadouro ,&nbsp;Nicholas Fallon ,&nbsp;Bernhard Frank ,&nbsp;Svajune Laurinaviciute ,&nbsp;Simon Keller ,&nbsp;Andrew Marshall","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain condition prevalent in 8 to 35% of stroke patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide insight into the effectiveness of available pharmacological, physical, psychological, and neuromodulation interventions in reducing pain in CPSP patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022371835). Secondary outcomes included mood, sleep, global impression of change, and physical responses. Data extraction included participant demographics, stroke etiology, pain characteristics, pain reduction scores, and secondary outcome metrics. Forty-two original studies were included, with a total of 1,451 participants. No studies providing psychological therapy to CPSP patients were identified. Twelve studies met requirements for a random-effects meta-analyses that found pharmacological therapy to have a small effect on mean pain score (SMD = −.36, 96.0% confidence interval [−.68, −.03]), physical interventions did not show a significant effect (SMD = −.55 [−1.28, .18]), and neuromodulation treatments had a moderate effect (SMD = −.64 [−1.08, −.19]). Fourteen studies were included in proportional meta-analysis with pharmacological studies having a moderate effect (58.3% mean pain reduction [−36.51, −80.15]) and neuromodulation studies a small effect (31.1% mean pain reduction [−43.45, −18.76]). Sixteen studies were included in the narrative review, the findings from which largely supported meta-analysis results. Duloxetine, amitriptyline, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had the most robust evidence for their effectiveness in alleviating CPSP-induced pain. Further multicenter placebo-controlled research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of physical therapies, such as acupuncture and virtual reality, and invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This article presents a top-down and bottom-up overview of evidence for the effectiveness of different pharmacological, physical, and neuromodulation treatments of CPSP. This review could provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and tolerability of different treatment types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 104666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590024006229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain condition prevalent in 8 to 35% of stroke patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide insight into the effectiveness of available pharmacological, physical, psychological, and neuromodulation interventions in reducing pain in CPSP patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022371835). Secondary outcomes included mood, sleep, global impression of change, and physical responses. Data extraction included participant demographics, stroke etiology, pain characteristics, pain reduction scores, and secondary outcome metrics. Forty-two original studies were included, with a total of 1,451 participants. No studies providing psychological therapy to CPSP patients were identified. Twelve studies met requirements for a random-effects meta-analyses that found pharmacological therapy to have a small effect on mean pain score (SMD = −.36, 96.0% confidence interval [−.68, −.03]), physical interventions did not show a significant effect (SMD = −.55 [−1.28, .18]), and neuromodulation treatments had a moderate effect (SMD = −.64 [−1.08, −.19]). Fourteen studies were included in proportional meta-analysis with pharmacological studies having a moderate effect (58.3% mean pain reduction [−36.51, −80.15]) and neuromodulation studies a small effect (31.1% mean pain reduction [−43.45, −18.76]). Sixteen studies were included in the narrative review, the findings from which largely supported meta-analysis results. Duloxetine, amitriptyline, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had the most robust evidence for their effectiveness in alleviating CPSP-induced pain. Further multicenter placebo-controlled research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of physical therapies, such as acupuncture and virtual reality, and invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation treatments.

Perspective

This article presents a top-down and bottom-up overview of evidence for the effectiveness of different pharmacological, physical, and neuromodulation treatments of CPSP. This review could provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and tolerability of different treatment types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风后中枢性疼痛的治疗:系统综述和元分析。
中枢性卒中后疼痛(CPSP)是一种神经病理性疼痛,在 8% 至 35% 的卒中患者中普遍存在。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在深入探讨现有的药物、物理、心理和神经调节干预措施在减轻 CPSP 患者疼痛方面的有效性(PROSPERO 注册:CRD42022371835)。次要结果包括情绪、睡眠、总体变化印象和身体反应。数据提取包括参与者人口统计学、中风病因学、疼痛特征、疼痛减轻评分和次要结果指标。共纳入 42 项原创研究,共有 1451 名参与者。未发现为 CPSP 患者提供心理治疗的研究。12项研究符合随机效应荟萃分析的要求,发现药物治疗对平均疼痛评分的影响较小(SMD = -.36,96.0% 置信区间 [-.68, -.03]),物理干预未显示出显著效果(SMD = -.55 [-1.28, .18]),神经调控治疗效果一般(SMD = -.64 [-1.08, -.19])。14项研究被纳入比例荟萃分析,其中药物治疗具有中等效果(平均疼痛减轻58.3% [-36.51,-80.15]),神经调节治疗效果较小(平均疼痛减轻31.1% [-43.45,-18.76])。16项研究被纳入叙述性综述,研究结果在很大程度上支持荟萃分析结果。度洛西汀、阿米替林和重复经颅磁刺激在缓解 CPSP 引起的疼痛方面具有最有力的证据。需要进一步开展多中心安慰剂对照研究,以确定针灸和虚拟现实等物理疗法以及侵入性和非侵入性神经调控疗法的有效性。观点:本文自上而下和自下而上地综述了不同药物、物理和神经调控治疗 CPSP 的有效性证据。该综述可帮助临床医生全面了解不同治疗方法的有效性和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Masthead Cannabidiol reduces neuropathic pain and cognitive impairments through activation of spinal PPARγ. Individual differences in response to repeated painful stimulation: habituation, sensitization, and nocebo effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1