Individual differences in response to repeated painful stimulation: Habituation, sensitization, and nocebo effects

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105377
Maite M. van der Miesen , Catherine J. Vossen , Viviane N. Compère , Elbert A.J. Joosten , David E.J. Linden , Judith C. Peters , Amanda L. Kaas
{"title":"Individual differences in response to repeated painful stimulation: Habituation, sensitization, and nocebo effects","authors":"Maite M. van der Miesen ,&nbsp;Catherine J. Vossen ,&nbsp;Viviane N. Compère ,&nbsp;Elbert A.J. Joosten ,&nbsp;David E.J. Linden ,&nbsp;Judith C. Peters ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Kaas","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study analyzes habituation, sensitization, and nocebo effects based on individual differences in response to painful stimulation. Habituation and sensitization to pain show two opposite patterns that may occur during repeated painful stimulation. Negative expectations such as a nocebo manipulation have been shown to increase pain ratings, but it is unclear to what extent they can influence habituation and sensitization to pain. In this preregistered study, we investigate the effects of repeated painful stimulation across time with pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings, individual differences in the response trajectories, and the impact of a nocebo manipulation in the context of habituation and sensitization response subgroups. We included 60 participants (26 male, 34 female, age 18–60) who received repeated painful electrical stimulation across four runs. Half of the participants received a negative verbal expectation (i.e., nocebo manipulation) after the third run. Participants provided both intensity and unpleasantness ratings after each stimulus. The results demonstrated large individual variability in responses. On the group level, participants showed sensitization to pain which decreased across runs. Individual slopes across and within-runs varied greatly, starting with mostly sensitization and ending with habituation profiles. Habituation of pain intensity and unpleasantness was highly correlated. The nocebo manipulation resulted in a significant nocebo effect, demonstrating a large increase in pain and unpleasantness ratings. In summary, this study showed large individual differences and the impact of a nocebo manipulation on the background of different response profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Repeated painful stimulation resulted in patterns of habituation and sensitization, with large individual variability that differed for across and within-run analyses. Pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings were highly correlated. A nocebo manipulation demonstrated increased intensity and unpleasantness reports, even after habituation and sensitization patterns were established.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 105377"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025006042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study analyzes habituation, sensitization, and nocebo effects based on individual differences in response to painful stimulation. Habituation and sensitization to pain show two opposite patterns that may occur during repeated painful stimulation. Negative expectations such as a nocebo manipulation have been shown to increase pain ratings, but it is unclear to what extent they can influence habituation and sensitization to pain. In this preregistered study, we investigate the effects of repeated painful stimulation across time with pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings, individual differences in the response trajectories, and the impact of a nocebo manipulation in the context of habituation and sensitization response subgroups. We included 60 participants (26 male, 34 female, age 18–60) who received repeated painful electrical stimulation across four runs. Half of the participants received a negative verbal expectation (i.e., nocebo manipulation) after the third run. Participants provided both intensity and unpleasantness ratings after each stimulus. The results demonstrated large individual variability in responses. On the group level, participants showed sensitization to pain which decreased across runs. Individual slopes across and within-runs varied greatly, starting with mostly sensitization and ending with habituation profiles. Habituation of pain intensity and unpleasantness was highly correlated. The nocebo manipulation resulted in a significant nocebo effect, demonstrating a large increase in pain and unpleasantness ratings. In summary, this study showed large individual differences and the impact of a nocebo manipulation on the background of different response profiles.

Perspective

Repeated painful stimulation resulted in patterns of habituation and sensitization, with large individual variability that differed for across and within-run analyses. Pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings were highly correlated. A nocebo manipulation demonstrated increased intensity and unpleasantness reports, even after habituation and sensitization patterns were established.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对反复疼痛刺激反应的个体差异:习惯化、致敏和反安慰剂效应。
本研究分析了基于个体对疼痛刺激反应差异的习惯化、致敏化和反安慰剂效应。在反复的疼痛刺激中,对疼痛的习惯化和敏感化表现出两种相反的模式。负面预期,如反安慰剂操作,已被证明会增加疼痛评级,但尚不清楚它们能在多大程度上影响对疼痛的习惯和敏感。在这项预先注册的研究中,我们研究了反复疼痛刺激对疼痛强度和不愉快程度评分的影响,反应轨迹的个体差异,以及反安慰剂操作在习惯化和敏化反应亚组中的影响。我们纳入了60名参与者(26名男性,34名女性,年龄18-60岁),他们在四次跑步中反复接受痛苦的电刺激。一半的参与者在第三次运行后得到了负面的口头期望(即反安慰剂操纵)。参与者在每次刺激后都提供了强度和不愉快的评级。结果表明,在反应中存在很大的个体差异。在小组水平上,参与者表现出对疼痛的敏感性,这种敏感性随着跑步而降低。每条赛道上和每条赛道内的坡度变化很大,从最敏感的开始到习惯化的结束。疼痛强度的习惯化与不愉快程度高度相关。反安慰剂操作产生了显著的反安慰剂效应,显示出疼痛和不愉快程度的大幅增加。总之,这项研究显示了巨大的个体差异和反安慰剂操作对不同反应概况背景的影响。观点:重复的疼痛刺激导致习惯化和敏感化模式,在跨组和组内分析中存在很大的个体差异。疼痛强度和不愉快评分高度相关。即使在习惯化和致敏模式建立之后,反安慰剂操作也显示出增加的强度和不愉快报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
"Dancing in Pain is a Symbol of Determination"- Understanding Dance Related Pain in Relation to Dancer Identity Using the Biopsychosocial Model of Health. What We Read Matters: Exploring Emotional and Cognitive Responses of Pain Science Education and Biomedical Education in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis. Response letter to Oka et al.'s letter to the editor. Delphi study to explore indicators of high functioning pain management teams Brain Mechanisms of Pain Anticipation in Chronic Low Back Pain: Insights into Phenotypical Responses to Mind-Body Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1