Assessing the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome during physical examination by measuring two-point discrimination: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.111536
{"title":"Assessing the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome during physical examination by measuring two-point discrimination: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) commonly presents after distal radius fractures. Assessing its degree of severity is essential to therapeutic decision-making - i.e. operative vs. conservative treatment. The role of the two-point discrimination (2PD) has not yet been evaluated as a potential indicator of severity during physical examination. Therefore, in our cross-sectional study, we aimed to find a correlation between 2PD values and disease severity, based on the gold-standard electromyography and electroneurography (EMG-ENG) and ultrasonography findings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a post-hoc analysis of prospectively assessed CTS patients for 2PD values. We analyzed the correlation between 2PD and EMG-ENG measurement results, patient characteristics, nerve ultrasonography, and relevant CTS questionnaires. CTS severity was determined by EMG-ENG results. The Pearson correlation was calculated between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 81 patients. The three pre-determined EMG-ENG severity categories showed a significant correlation between both 2PD values and 2PD severity categories (<em>r</em> <em>=</em> 0.29 [0.07–0.48] and <em>r</em> <em>=</em> 0.26 [0.03–0.45]). Distal sensory latency and conduction velocity values correlated significantly with 2PD categories. However, the correlation coefficients (<em>r</em> <em>=</em> 0.25 [0.02–0.46] and <em>r=</em>-0.24 [-0.37–0.07]) were low. The 2PD severity categories showed no significant correlation with the severity assessed by nerve ultrasound (<em>r=</em>-0.07 [-0.38–0.25]). The 2PD values showed a significant correlation between the values of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire (<em>r</em> <em>=</em> 0.3 [0.06–0.51]). We concluded that the best cut-off value for differentiating severe from non-severe CTS was at the 9.5 mm 2PD cut-off value (sensitivity = 0.65 [0.45–0.81], specificity = 0.71[0.58–0.82], AUC = 0.71 [0.59–0.83]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a significant correlation between 2PD values and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome as determined by EMG-ENG; however, they are not interchangeable. Based on the results of our study, we propose that measuring two-point discrimination may be a quick and easy, reliable and cost-effective screening method to assess the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome following distal radius fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324002237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) commonly presents after distal radius fractures. Assessing its degree of severity is essential to therapeutic decision-making - i.e. operative vs. conservative treatment. The role of the two-point discrimination (2PD) has not yet been evaluated as a potential indicator of severity during physical examination. Therefore, in our cross-sectional study, we aimed to find a correlation between 2PD values and disease severity, based on the gold-standard electromyography and electroneurography (EMG-ENG) and ultrasonography findings.

Methods

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of prospectively assessed CTS patients for 2PD values. We analyzed the correlation between 2PD and EMG-ENG measurement results, patient characteristics, nerve ultrasonography, and relevant CTS questionnaires. CTS severity was determined by EMG-ENG results. The Pearson correlation was calculated between variables.

Results

The study included 81 patients. The three pre-determined EMG-ENG severity categories showed a significant correlation between both 2PD values and 2PD severity categories (r = 0.29 [0.07–0.48] and r = 0.26 [0.03–0.45]). Distal sensory latency and conduction velocity values correlated significantly with 2PD categories. However, the correlation coefficients (r = 0.25 [0.02–0.46] and r=-0.24 [-0.37–0.07]) were low. The 2PD severity categories showed no significant correlation with the severity assessed by nerve ultrasound (r=-0.07 [-0.38–0.25]). The 2PD values showed a significant correlation between the values of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire (r = 0.3 [0.06–0.51]). We concluded that the best cut-off value for differentiating severe from non-severe CTS was at the 9.5 mm 2PD cut-off value (sensitivity = 0.65 [0.45–0.81], specificity = 0.71[0.58–0.82], AUC = 0.71 [0.59–0.83]).

Conclusion

There is a significant correlation between 2PD values and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome as determined by EMG-ENG; however, they are not interchangeable. Based on the results of our study, we propose that measuring two-point discrimination may be a quick and easy, reliable and cost-effective screening method to assess the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome following distal radius fractures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过测量两点辨别力评估体格检查中腕管综合征的严重程度:对前瞻性收集数据的事后分析。
导言:腕管综合征(CTS)常见于桡骨远端骨折后。评估其严重程度对于治疗决策(即手术治疗与保守治疗)至关重要。两点辨别法(2PD)作为体格检查时判断严重程度的潜在指标,其作用尚未得到评估。因此,在我们的横断面研究中,我们的目标是根据黄金标准肌电图和电神经电图(EMG-ENG)以及超声波检查结果,找出 2PD 值与疾病严重程度之间的相关性:我们对前瞻性评估的 CTS 患者的 2PD 值进行了事后分析。我们分析了 2PD 和 EMG-ENG 测量结果、患者特征、神经超声检查和相关 CTS 问卷之间的相关性。CTS 严重程度由 EMG-ENG 测量结果决定。计算变量之间的皮尔逊相关性:研究共纳入 81 名患者。预先确定的三个 EMG-ENG 严重程度类别显示,2PD 值与 2PD 严重程度类别之间存在显著相关性(r= 0.29 [0.07-0.48] 和 r= 0.26 [0.03-0.45])。远端感觉潜伏期和传导速度值与 2PD 类别显著相关。然而,相关系数(r= 0.25 [0.02-0.46] 和 r=-0.24 [-0.37-0.07])较低。2PD 严重程度类别与神经超声评估的严重程度无明显相关性(r=-0.07 [-0.38-0.25])。2PD 值与手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)问卷调查值之间存在明显相关性(r= 0.3 [0.06-0.51])。我们得出结论,区分严重和非严重 CTS 的最佳临界值是 9.5 mm 2PD 临界值(灵敏度 = 0.65 [0.45-0.81],特异性 = 0.71 [0.58-0.82],AUC = 0.71 [0.59-0.83]):结论:2PD值与EMG-ENG测定的腕管综合征严重程度之间存在明显的相关性,但二者不能互换。根据我们的研究结果,我们认为测量两点辨别力可能是评估桡骨远端骨折后腕管综合征严重程度的一种快速、简便、可靠且经济有效的筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Fracture-related infection blood-based biomarkers: Diagnostic strategies The value of current diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections: Serum markers, histology, and cultures Antimicrobial resistance: Biofilms, small colony variants, and intracellular bacteria In vivo models of infection: Large animals – Mini review on human-scale one-stage revision in a porcine osteomyelitis model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1